Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cardinals Willing to Trade Patrick Peterson for Picks

beastson

By beastson,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Mage Grand Master

Mage

Posted
Posted

Eh, obviously as a team you'd always would accept a player at PP's quality, but I wouldn't say we need him or anything.  Bradberry and Jackson are fine.  I'd rather us throw picks at a pass rusher, which is what is hurting our defense more than anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mage Grand Master

Mage

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

You trade someone 1 year before you think you should...he is declining fast.   No thanks

He's only 28 and is a freak athlete.  Only reason they probably want to trade him is because they know the team is bad and isn't going anywhere anytime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nails Newbie

Nails

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Mage said:

Eh, obviously as a team you'd always would accept a player at PP's quality, but I wouldn't say we need him or anything.  Bradberry and Jackson are fine.  I'd rather us throw picks at a pass rusher, which is what is hurting our defense more than anything.

 

Just now, luke nukem said:

we need DE help

No picks needed.

7954FAA6-8D3B-440F-BFA8-D2E823FB8122.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nails Newbie

Nails

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, rbsponsel52 said:

Why do you keep trying to fly a kite with no wind. This will never happen.

Because the desperate need from the Panthers, predictably, remains there.  Hardy has done EVERYTHING that a man could possibly do to on his end.  

We signed Eric Reid as a football decision.

The only questions that remain are-how bad do the Panthers want to win a Super Bowl?  Does Dave Tepper really have brass balls?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...