Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

LaDainian Tomlinson on the Panthers offense


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Talking about today's game on Gameday Prime, host Charissa Thompson asked LaDainian Tomlinson (who played under Norv Turner in San Diego) "What's wrong with the Panthers offense?"

Don't have a clip available at this point, so I'll try to summarize how Tomlinson  responded, beginning with a direct quote:

"Here's the thing.Cam can't do what Norv needs him to do".

Tomlinson asserted (correctly) that Norv Turner's offenses are all about timing. The idea is to hit the three, five or seven step drop and get the ball out quick. Timing and rhythm are everything.

He then stated that Newton doesn't do these things well.

Flipping the coin, Tomlinson also said that the things which Newton does do well (mentioning specifically the read option) are plays that Turner "doesn't know how to call" properly. That's not his game, and thus the two of them wind up being a mismatch.

Thompson followed up Tomlinson's analysis by asking him how to fix it. Tomlinson said it's primarily up to Newton to learn how to run Turner's offense. Though he did say that Turner could also try to learn some of what Cam knows well, he put the brunt of the responsibility on Newton.

Deion Sanders pointed out that Newton has been effective running, but agreed with Tomlinson that Newton is not a timing quarterback (doubt anybody here would argue that).

Tomlinson then expressed that he believes Turner is in a very tough position. Speaking to Sanders, Tomlinson said (paraphrasing) "You know how hard it is for an offensive coordinator to call plays when he doesn't know if the guy running the plays can do it, so you have to settle for this" (i.e. something you know he can do).

Asked how long they would expect it to take to fix the problem, Sanders answered "playoffs", so effectively the whole regular season. Mind you, if Sanders were correct about this, I kinda question whether we'd actually be in the playoffs.

Thought it would be worth posting what was said. It'd be nice if a clip were available, but not yet. Maybe tomorrow.

Clip or no clip, I have a sense that Tomlinson's comments probably won't be all that well received here :thinking:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mother Grabber said:

looked like we moved the ball well after the first quarter, especially in the second half. the 3 turnovers stalled drives, and our defense gave up long drives that ended in FG. we only had the ball 3 times, but all three drives were solid, until we stalled on the last one.

I'm of the opinion that the defense is a larger problem than the offense right now.

It is, however, valid to point out that our offense has had some struggles. And seeing as that last drive is the final visual that's going to stick in a lot of people's minds, I expect there to be a decent amount of discussion about it (fair or not).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm of the opinion that the defense is a larger problem than the offense right now.

It is, however, valid to point out that our offense has had some struggles. And seeing as that last drive is the final visual that's going to stick in a lot of people's minds, I expect there to be a decent amount of discussion about it (fair or not).

I even question why Cam didn't target Olsen but then again why didn't the Seahawks run it in the superbowl? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A gutless 4th down punt and two costly fumbles  essentially lost us a game we still almost won. Cam is Cam and he’ll only mesh with Norv even more as the season goes. I’m not too worried about them, we’ll be alright and squeak in the playoffs and hopefully make some noise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Snake said:

Timing isn't the issue. Newton is definitely late sometimes but every QB is. Grand scheme we were down 17 and almost came back. It isn't a QB failure. 

It's not just timing in the sense of generic timing, though. It's pointing out that Newton isn't that type of quarterback.

It's not a criticism of Newton to say that he isn't a "timing and rhythm" quarterback. He isn't. Neither is Roethlisberger (and others). The reverse analogy would be asking a guy like Tom Brady or Drew Brees to run a read option.

Whether or not these differences in approach are big enough to cause a problem is the real question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

It's not just timing in the sense of generic timing, though. It's pointing out that Newton isn't that type of quarterback.

It's not a criticism of Newton to say that he isn't a "timing and rhythm" quarterback. He isn't. Neither is Roethlisberger (and others). The reverse analogy would be asking a guy like Tom Brady or Drew Brees to run a read option.

Whether or not these differences in approach are big enough to cause a problem is the question.

IMO Newton is having one of his better years as far as pocket awareness and rhythm. It's a complex thing because his WRs are also new and young. Either way Norv has been much better than Shula and honestly Cam and the read option need to be faded out because it's been used so much. With McCaffery I rather have a short pass than a read option and Cam still gets his best runs under center not with the option. If anything this year I think we have forced the read option just to make the run game work when we could have been using screens or short passes to set it up. Just my thoughts though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Snake said:

IMO Newton is having one of his better years as far as pocket awareness and rhythm. It's a complex thing because his WRs are also new and young. Either way Norv has been much better than Shula and honestly Cam and the read option need to be faded out because it's been used so much. With McCaffery I rather have a short pass than a read option and Cam still gets his best runs under center not with the option. If anything this year I think we have forced the read option just to make the run game work when we could have been using screens or short passes to set it up. Just my thoughts though. 

I don't think anybody would argue against the notion that Norv is a better OC than Shula. No doubt Turner is infinitely better when it comes to knowing how to use Christian McCaffrey.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Norv’s offense is a relic just like he is. Look at Rivers numbers when Norv left, he had a career year. Look at the Vikings offense with Norv left, again instantly got better. Even the Browns offense got better I believe.

 

 

Its obvious our offense and Cam are at their best when they play at a fast pace and let him throw it and control the tempo of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're just not a very good football team right now. We're 20th in the league in yards per game. We're 20th in the league in yards allowed per game. We're 12th in points for, we're 13th in points against.

It's surprising that were 3-2. Had Gano missed that hail Mary and we were 2-3 I'd say that record pretty much perfectly matches what the stats would suggest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We're just not a very good football team right now. We're 20th in the league in yards per game. We're 20th in the league in yards allowed per game. We're 12th in points for, we're 13th in points against.

It's surprising that were 3-2. Had Gano missed that hail Mary and we were 2-3 I'd say that record pretty much perfectly matches what the stats would suggest.

Gotta give Chase Blackburn a pat on the back for that one. Apparently he's the one who convinced Rivera to go for the long field goal (really took some balls when you think about it).

Chase might just have a decent future in coaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't think anybody would argue against the notion that Norv is a better OC than Shula. No doubt Turner is infinitely better when it comes to knowing how to use Christian McCaffrey.

 

And while timing routes may not be Newtons familiarity once every gets on the same page we should see more guys getting open. Ian Thomas would be one of those who down the stretch should provide extra firepower once he grapes the timing routes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...