Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we give props to James Borrego? He hasn't played Frank Kaminsky unless it's blowout time!


JakeDel5674

Recommended Posts

After i heard Coach JB speak about his philosophy, I knew we got the right guy.  These last two games have shown exactly why I and many others wanted Clifford gone for years...  almost the same exact roster getting the minutes, and they look completely different.  Energized, enthused, motivated, focused...  just a completely different team, but with the same players.  Gonna be an exciting year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, davos said:

Marvin and Frank should float away.  We're in decent shape; looking like a 3-5 seed right meow. 

Marvin is essential to our team defense, he also shoots the 3 at a 40% clip, you don't get rid of those guys.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Borrego calling out the team is a welcome sight...

The plays that stand out to me are the effort: The lack of physicality, the lack of competitiveness, not going after loose balls. We lost six of seven 50-50 balls last night. It all converted into points for them. They had 50 points in the paint.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/26/2018 at 3:26 PM, Professor Chaos said:

I mean, he's been giving Marvin Williams minutes while he's sucked.

Nah man, Marv is solid on this team bro, he's essential to our team D and shoots the 3 at a 40% clip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...