Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Watch Thursday night football and Refs are terrible


Snake

Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, Toomers said:

I thought I missed something when I heard that? So every swing pass that is behind the RB is now incomplete? 

Or every intentional grounding? Well ref, I was throwing to the guy on the other side of the field. Disregard where the ball actually went.

52 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Honestly, all they really needed to say was that Osweiler's arm was moving forward in what appeared to be a throwing motion so by rule it is an Incomplete pass. Yeah, it looked like he saw the defender at the last second and tried to tuck the ball, but there's no way to read the guy's mind.

It went backwards. A backwards pass a lateral. Should have been a fumble. I don't care where he intended to throw it. He threw it backwards.

52 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

All fairness I also wonder why that wouldn't be a lateral either if it never really moved forward imo. If you throw behind isn't it still considered a lateral?

Yup. One of the worst calls I've ever seen. A backwards pass is a lateral.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, saints4lifeagain said:

Or every intentional grounding? Well ref, I was throwing to the guy on the other side of the field. Disregard where the ball actually went.

It went backwards. A backwards pass a lateral. Should have been a fumble. I don't care where he intended to throw it. He threw it backwards.

Yup. One of the worst calls I've ever seen. A backwards pass is a lateral.

It doesn't matter where the ball goes. It's completely irrelevant. If the refs judge that the QB was attempting to make a pass and in control off the ball with his arm moving forward at the time of contact, then by rule it is an incomplete pass. To call that a fun le they would've had to have made the huge assumption that Osweiler had abandoned his attempt at a pass. I don't want refs making those types of huge assumptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, outlaw4 said:

Looks like we're not the only ones on the wrong side of that type of play.

 

1 hour ago, luke nukem said:

yeah fug that play, just takes the safety to not bite for it to be countered.

What was the play?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The aversion to tying up too much money in the ground game when it’s what’s winning us games is crazy to me. I get letting Rico walk if you think he’s easily replaceable but I don’t see many people arguing that, just applying an arbitrary salary cap based on what we think RBs are currently worth. I’d rather be stuck with Hubbard as an overpaid backup (not the worst one to have, mind you) than lose out on the most productive player on the offense personally.
    • Why do people keep saying things like “it’s not Young’s fault we spent so much to draft him”? Who cares if it’s his fault?  Nobody is saying send him to jail or anything.  People aren’t talking about blame for the decision to draft him, they’re talking about how bad he is as a QB and how we’d be much better with even an average QB.  Pointing out that we sunk a lot of resources into drafting him isn’t invalidated because he didn’t make that decision himself. Doesn’t matter whose fault that was, he’s still not playing like a QB who was drafted at all, much less one that cost two firsts, two seconds and a #1 WR. 
    • Might wanna edit your post https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2025/01/13/rams-vikings-live-score-updates-nfl-playoffs/77665954007/
×
×
  • Create New...