Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The issue on defense is pressure


SixMileDrive

Recommended Posts

In prior years, teams have been forced to take short throws and try to dink and dunk their way down the field because we've had ends and tackles that created quick pressure without the need for frequent blitzing. That's no longer the case. We've got talent at LB and all over the secondary, but Short is getting doubled constantly and Addison + whoever else just aren't winning their one on ones. We don't get there when we blitz four and we are letting teams run on us because our line isn't doing its job. Don't get me wrong, I'm not sold on Washington but it's hard for me to judge him too hard right now when we don't have the talent we're used to at DE and DT. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Lobo said:

I’ve seen this a lot, there were a ton of throws were Stanford completed them in about two seconds. No pass rush will stop that. We sag way too much in coverage. Blitz our best cover LB way too much as well.

That makes we wonder why don't we utilize quick passes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SixMileDrive said:

In prior years, teams have been forced to take short throws and try to dink and dunk their way down the field because we've had ends and tackles that created quick pressure without the need for frequent blitzing. That's no longer the case. We've got talent at LB and all over the secondary, but Short is getting doubled constantly and Addison + whoever else just aren't winning their one on ones. We don't get there when we blitz four and we are letting teams run on us because our line isn't doing its job. Don't get me wrong, I'm not sold on Washington but it's hard for me to judge him too hard right now when we don't have the talent we're used to at DE and DT. 

Hahahahahaha there's no talent in the secondary. Stop fitting your narrative snowflake

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Lobo said:

I’ve seen this a lot, there were a ton of throws were Stanford completed them in about two seconds. No pass rush will stop that. We sag way too much in coverage. Blitz our best cover LB way too much as well.

It was the chunk plays that hurt us the most. And yeah, I'm really confused on why we are blitzing Luke so damn often. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PhillyB said:

gotta get interior pressure. no excuse to have high dollar, big name players at that position and get such lackluster results.

I thought that Poe was going to be an upgrade over Star and was completely wrong. Watching the last few drives KK was doubled almost every play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pressure is the issue, but our front four pass rush has sucked for years now.  Hell even in 2015 it wasn't very good other than Kawann Short.  The issue is we aren't good at scheming pressure anymore.  It was either 2017 or 2016 or both where we were near the top of the league in sacks and it wasn't because our front four was great but more so because we blitzed exceptionally well.  Washington isn't good enough to do that.

Our LBs have also regressed massively in coverage.  Either that or Kuechly is too busy being asked to bull rush a 300 pound lineman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SixMileDrive said:

It was the chunk plays that hurt us the most. And yeah, I'm really confused on why we are blitzing Luke so damn often. 

Yes you are correct. There were times when he did sit in the pocket for longer, but we had weird stunts called and no pressure. We just stink right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Malcom Spence is the best player remaining, hope he’s there.
    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
×
×
  • Create New...