Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Likeliest of 3 coaching staff scenarios


davos

Recommended Posts

How would you rank the likelihood of these three scenarios?   

  • Rivera gets retained, we bring back a recently fired Steve Wilks as DC
  • Rivera gets retained, we bring back a recently fired McDermott as DC
  • Tepper cleans house.  We hire a young offensive guy (I.E. DeFillipo Dan Campbell, Bieniemy, etc.)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I see absolutely zero chance of Ron Meeks getting a job here again.

Much as I hate to say it, if Eric Washington is out and it's Rivera's choice who to replace him with, don't be surprised to see Richard Rodgers get promoted to that job.

Please no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It all depends on the finish. If we get ourselves straightened out and make a run down the stretch I doubt anything will change. If the downward spiral continues, I think we'll see a wholesale change. I don't think Tepper will let Ron simply scapegoat Washington. If there is a change, I think we'll go with an aggressive offensive minded coach. Looking at what teams like the Chiefs, Rams, and Saints are doing and then looking at our roster, o think we have to go with an offensive minded coach. We have a franchise QB and a lot of young weapons around him in an increasingly offensive driven league. I'd love an aggressive young offensive minded coach who would bring with him a seasoned veteran DC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, davos said:

How would you rank the likelihood of these three scenarios?   

  • Rivera gets retained, we bring back a recently fired Steve Wilks as DC
  • Rivera gets retained, we bring back a recently fired McDermott as DC
  • Tepper cleans house.  We hire a young offensive guy (I.E. DeFillipo Dan Campbell, Bieniemy, etc.)

 

What we have now is really worst case scenerio.  If RR was straight up trash it would be easy to cut ties, instead we have this zombie/undead push every year to just barely make the post season and then a quick exit.  Will  RR & Norv outwit Peyton or Belichek?  It just doesn't seem like it.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I see absolutely zero chance of Ron Meeks getting a job here again.

Much as I hate to say it, if Eric Washington is out and it's Rivera's choice who to replace him with, don't be surprised to see Richard Rodgers get promoted to that job.

Hehe...fixed the f-up but not quick enough!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Manther said:

What we have now is really worst case scenerio.  If RR was straight up trash it would be easy to cut ties, instead we have this zombie/undead push every year to just barely make the post season and then a quick exit.  Will  RR & Norv outwit Peyton or Belichek?  It just doesn't seem like it.  

 

Well record indicates they have, at least RR, outwitted Belichek..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, davos said:

How would you rank the likelihood of these three scenarios?   

  • Rivera gets retained, we bring back a recently fired Steve Wilks as DC
  • Rivera gets retained, we bring back a recently fired McDermott as DC
  • Tepper cleans house.  We hire a young offensive guy (I.E. DeFillipo Dan Campbell, Bieniemy, etc.)

 

Not gonna happen. BTW why don’t we use Olsen more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...