Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The next time a failcons fan tries to troll saying “cAm No DiVe SuPeRbOwL fUmBlE


Saca312

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, brandon_87 said:

Lol nothing compares to the damn Superbowl. That's the biggest stage, biggest game in the entire country. It's what all 32 teams play for every single season. You jump on the damn ball regardless if anything

You're ignoring all the fumbles Cam has recovered by doing exactly what he did in the SB - stand back from the pile and wait for the ball to pop out. He recovered one earlier this year by doing exactly that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You're ignoring all the fumbles Cam has recovered by doing exactly what he did in the SB - stand back from the pile and wait for the ball to pop out. He recovered one earlier this year by doing exactly that.

Very true, but, Superbowl is a different situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Castavar said:

Honestly, Falcon fans haven't brought that up ever since their epic choke in the superbowl. NOTHING can ever top that.

Yeah, I don't see a lot of Falcons fans bringing up other teams' SB "fails" anymore. 

It is a little ironic that we're both 0-2 in the Super Bowl, against the same two teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would have been 4th down sigh

 

  • 3rd & 9 at CAR 25

    (4:04 - 4th) (Shotgun) C.Newton sacked at CAR 16 for -9 yards (V.Miller). FUMBLES (V.Miller), touched at CAR 18, RECOVERED by DEN-T.Ward at CAR 9. T.Ward to CAR 4 for 5 yards (M.Remmers). V.Miller credited with 7-yd sack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who thinks you stand a better change recovering a fumble after the initial guys hop on it and it squirts around..... I never got the he didn't jump crap.  The ball popped out and he was waiting for it, unfortunately, it was to his left and then the illegal batting that wasn't called happened when he went for it.   I as someone above stated it happens all time time especially around the line of scrimmage the initial scrum just kicks the ball back wards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...