Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interims: Lance + Scott


saX man

Recommended Posts

I think it's safe to say Washington is gone tomorrow as a quick scapegoat.

Rivera however is cornered bc he is a defensive coach, our defense is awful, and he apparently took over duties today on D; we lose to TB.  

I think it's entirely safe to say we clean house end of year from GM to the coaching staff.  I'm done with this crew.  

Question is...do we just get it out of the way right now?  I say yes. 

We've got Lance Taylor and Scott Turner.  Neither will likely have this primo of a shot in their careers to see what they can do at this level so why not?  Just throw them to the wolves against CLE, NO and ATL.   

lfcqi151p14z1xj8kftv.jpg

191f07579c8d7cd521ee033dcfc1734a-origina

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sucks for Taylor that he left a very secure situation at Stanford to dive into this dumpster fire.

I've been goofingly supportive of him but the guy has a big future in the league. He's thought of very highly internally and throughout a few west coast origin coaching trees.  I think we have a diamond hiding in the turds.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rayzor said:

I'd be cool with either.

Big question is who takes over the D? Rodgers? Bleh.

Funny thing is Rodgers is a TE/ST type guy.  How is he on defense now?? and why don't we have his son stashed on the PS? 

I don't even care at this point.  Funny thing is we feel this sh*tty but at least Atlanta is completely falling apart at the seams.  

It's STEVE RUSS time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Kevin Greene said:

Rivera, the Defensive guru. How could he not recognize before this Washington has struggled so badly?

Because he’s not a guru at coaching at all. He’s been carried by the talent of our players and received the credit for it, our player are now old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Considering you previously struggled to understand BTT despite it being explained in a video, write-up, and multiple replies, I get why this might be a little too complex for you. Happy to clarify again! Just let me know which part tripped you up this time. 😉
    • And, honestly, there's only so much you can attempt to do in the draft. And every draft pick is a roll of the dice. But that's where grabbing a ton of UDFAs, and targeting the best, makes a big difference. Sure, their individual chances of getting a hit here is less, but that shotgun pattern might just hit something.  Right now, we need bulk, partly to rebuild and partly to dilute the deep level of stank that has developed on this team in the last six years. If we're going to rebuild a culture built around culture, accountability and winning, then these UDFAs we bring in each season have to be the wash water that gets out that leftover dirt.  Canales seems to be a smart, culture-first, build up the good ones kind of guy. I like that and I hope he can keep it going here. But he was working against a locker room that had been taught to lose and taught to distrust or ignore coaches. He's got his work cut out for him, still. He does seem to have it moving in the right direction and that's something I was pretty amazed with by the end of last season.  
    • The most telling sign, IMO, of a team on the upward swing is who we lost in the off-season. Who left that even saw the field? Woods, Clowney, Sanders, & Hekker. OK...no big deal. Clowney is the only 1 that I raised an eyebrow over and I get that it was a money decision. No need to pay him over $7M to take snaps from our draft picks when he was just OK last year.
×
×
  • Create New...