Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Difference between ron and a great coach

juliosantos

By juliosantos,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

mc52beast Grand Master

mc52beast

Posted
Posted

Dude said in his presser that “we have holes to fill on this team” and “we need to add speed to the defense. When we play fast good things happen.”

so all of a sudden the team has holes and all of a sudden Ron and Marty have figured out that the NFL is now about speed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Car123 Proficient

Car123

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Dude said in his presser that “we have holes to fill on this team” and “we need to add speed to the defense. When we play fast good things happen.”

so all of a sudden the team has holes and all of a sudden Ron and Marty have figured out that the NFL is now about speed. 

Marty said that last season. We addressed it with Moore and Jackson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted

Was going to write about this today. Two high profile coaches who took an L yesterday took full blame for the loss. You ask Ron about it and he says you need to ask the players... I supported him all the way until yesterday. He can coach defense but should no longer be a head coach. He is like Jack Del Rio where they are hard nosed coaches who are stuck in a bygone era and can't adapt to today's NFL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chief9 Newbie

chief9

Posted
Posted

Unfortunately Ron doesn't have the mindset to coach in todays NFL.  He doesn't think offensively, consistent poor clock management, and apparently poor defensive scheme calling as well.  Ive liked and wanted him to succeed, now I believe its time to try a new direction.  I would like to see Norv continue the offensive play calling and take over the HC duties for the balance of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Just a winner? He went 6-9 last year. Just because a guy got carried to the SB by elite surrounding talent doesn't mean much. How did Nick Files pan out after catching lightning on a bottle?
    • LinvilleGorge
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Hurts is an elite threat with his legs though. He's gonna stress an opposing DC a lot more than Brock Purdy.
    • tukafan21
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
×
×
  • Create New...