Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

23-25


Randolph Panther

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Randolph Panther said:

That is our record since whipping Arizona's ass in the NFC Championship in 2015-16.  Damn things have fallen off.  Prior to the Super Bowl game that night we had a record of 42-16-1 going back into 2012.  

Oh wee mayne

But with the way the NFL declared open season on Cam's head coupled with the brilliance of our coaching brain trust, I guess 23-25 could have been worse.

Heres hoping better days lay ahead

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I judge it a successful year if we win at least 1 playoff game during that seasons' postseason. So here's what really happened 

  • 2011 : 6-10 (Failure) 
  • 2012 : 7-9 (Failure)
  • 2013: 12-4 (Failure)
  • 2014: 7-8-1 (Success) 
  • 2015 : 15-1 (Success)
  • 2016 : 6-10 (Failure)
  • 2017 : 11-5 (Failure)
  • 2018 : (I'm guessing) 7-9 (Failure)

Dont let division titles or a couple of good seasons fool you. In reality, We've only done damage in the playoffs in 2 out 8 seasons in Riveras time here. Thats not acceptable IMO. 

All he's really done is maintain the franchise status quo in 0 back to back winning seasons, and occasional playoff appearances with one miracle season that ended in a SB loss. 

And since the SB loss, we've managed 1 playoff appearance in 3 seasons and 0 playoff wins in those 3 seasons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

I judge it a successful year if we win at least 1 playoff game during that seasons' postseason. So here's what really happened 

  • 2011 : 6-10 (Failure) 
  • 2012 : 7-9 (Failure)
  • 2013: 12-4 (Failure)
  • 2014: 7-8-1 (Success) 
  • 2015 : 15-1 (Success)
  • 2016 : 6-10 (Failure)
  • 2017 : 11-5 (Failure)
  • 2018 : (I'm guessing) 7-9 (Failure)

Dont let division titles or a couple of good seasons fool you. In reality, We've only done damage in the playoffs in 2 out 8 seasons in Riveras time here. Thats not acceptable IMO. 

All he's really done is maintain the franchise status quo in 0 back to back winning seasons, and occasional playoff appearances with one miracle season that ended in a SB loss. 

And since the SB loss, we've managed 1 playoff appearance in 3 seasons and 0 playoff wins in those 3 seasons. 

Welp, when you put it that way...

Image result for oh no we suck again meme

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Randolph Panther said:

That is our record since whipping Arizona's ass in the NFC Championship in 2015-16.  Damn things have fallen off.  Prior to the Super Bowl game that night we had a record of 42-16-1 going back into 2012.  

Somehow this really makes it seem like we're not average to awful every other year.  2012 and 2014 were not special.  I suppose a 17 win season can really skew the point when you plug it in the right place though.  The reality is, this team is very inconsistent and 2018 is just another inconsistent year.  42-16-1 seems like you're trying to say we weren't inconsistent until after the Superbowl loss. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...