Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Difference an oline makes it to a season Colts


raleigh-panther

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

We have absolutely got to upgrade that oline

Left to right 

need further, Cowboys. Dak is ordinary 

first pick in draft needs to be a stud LT.  The second most important position on the team

got to be. Please sweet baby Jesus 

What if there aren’t any “stud LTs” available?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

That would also be the difference in a GM seeing as Ryan Grigson shuffled the O-line on an annual basis.

And of course, there's also Frank Reich, a guy I was really hoping we'd get.

If McDaniels would have just kept his word. Like Reich too. Starting to get interested in Bienemy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AU-panther said:

Every year people on this board talk about how important O-line is but once the draft rolls around they talk themselves out of it.

The "sexier" positions (WR, RB, DE) always seem to be more important at draft time.

  I’m saying there isn’t any OL in this draft worth #16. With 3 picks between 78 and 115(around those) there is plenty of opportunity to take one or two G/C candidates. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Toomers said:

  I’m saying there isn’t any OL in this draft worth #16. With 3 picks between 78 and 115(around those) there is plenty of opportunity to take one or two G/C candidates. 

Remains to be seen, but we can certainly trade up with a first, second and extra third.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

Remains to be seen, but we can certainly trade up with a first, second and extra third.

If there’s not one worth 16(that’s JMO) why would I want to trade up. 

  And I sure don’t want Hurney trading up under any circumstances. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...