Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mel Kiper's First 2019 Mock - 01/17/19


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, JARROD said:

If he’s the pick, then he is. I like that you have a choice that you put out there— nothing bad I can say about the pick—

i think from watching the videos and draft reports that Ed Oliver would be better,.. but who knows. Some have compared Ed to Aaron Donald— 

if we traded short and drafted one of these and used the draft picks from Short to draft another DE, a Center, DB or even another tightend I would be happy.

I’ll take a Fletcher Cox  clone 24/7 

Simmons would instantly improve Luke’s & KK‘s production. I wouldn’t be mad if it’s a top center pick either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Ace_Aladdin said:

I’ll take a Fletcher Cox  clone 24/7 

Simmons would instantly improve Luke’s & KK‘s production. I wouldn’t be mad if it’s a top center pick either. 

No one who knows anything about football could be mad about taking Ed Oliver in the top 10 but certainly at our pick it'd be a steal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/18/2019 at 6:38 AM, Tepper's Chest Hair said:

16) Carolina Panthers: Brian Burns, OLB, Florida State

Mario Addison led the Panthers with nine sacks this season, followed by five for the ageless Julius Peppers. Unless Peppers can play forever, this is a clear area of need for Carolina. The 6-foot-5, 235-pound Burns, who had 10 sacks in 2018, needs more time in the weight room, but he could grow into a defensive end.

Oh jeebus, please no, not another "grow him up" development project.

How about we fugging bring in a player with the size, strength, and speed to play Day One with our overall #16 pick, Kiper, you dumbass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/18/2019 at 5:32 PM, unicar15 said:

You mean like Kalil Mack, Von Miller, Dee Ford, Frank Clark? Personally I’d rather have someone who can get interior pressure and collapse a pocket. But there are plenty of 250lb pass rushers excelling in the league.

Mack, Miller, and Ford all play OLB in a 3-4D.

Clark was 270 lbs when he was drafted, not 235.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...