Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Speeding Ticket


Arroz con Panther

Recommended Posts

I got a speeding ticket on the way to work this morning on fricken Old Pineville Road in Charlotte, of all places. 45 in a 30. That road should not be 30 and no one goes 30 on it. I'm a little annoyed, but I know the drill. Hire a lawyer, get it dismissed, pay some money. It's my first ticket in probably 10 years and my first in Mecklenburg County. I have a couple of questions:

1) Does anyone have recommendations for a good "speeding ticket" lawyer?

2) How much did you have to pay when you got your last speeding ticket?

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the fine less than the cost of hiring a lawyer? Mine was $260 for doing 85 in a 55. I went to traffic court, plead guilty and ended up paying $90. They also knocked it down from a speeding violation to a non-moving violation so less points or no points on my license. Just go to traffic court and kiss some booty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait a couple days and the legal ads will begin flooding your mailbox.

Other options include just going to court and pleading. Advantage is you're standing in front of the judge and he looks at you and your driving record and probably fines you less than what the mail-in cost would be.

Can also plead guilty and ask for a "Prayer for Judgment":

Unique to North Carolina, a Prayer for Judgment Continued (PJC) is often used in traffic violations. It allows someone to plead guilty and ask for a “Prayer for Judgement,” meaning the offense isn’t entered against you. For example, you plead guilty to a speeding ticket, then ask for Prayer for Judgement. If granted, the license points will not be added to your record.

While this sounds like a great deal, a successful petition is not guaranteed or automatic. In addition, Prayer for Judgements can only be used twice in five years per household. Judges use a lot of discretion and vary widely in their granting Prayer for Judgements. This can cause increased insurance rates, driver’s license suspension, employment and housing issues, and other situations that involve background checks.

With a decent driving record, this might be what really saves you some cash. Those points will likely hurt your insurance for a couple years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last ticket I got was in Cabarrus county a few months ago going 70 in a 55. State trooper pointed out to me on the ticket the option of requesting a plea deal online.  Literally took about 30 seconds and within 2 days I got a response from the DA offering an improper equipment violation instead. Paid the fine online and avoided court and lawyers. Officer told me it was something fairly new and the lawyers hate it because it cuts them out of the equation and saves people a lot of time and money. 

Not sure if that is an option in your case but look into it and if it is, I recommend going that route. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Johnny Rockets said:

The last ticket I got was in Cabarrus county a few months ago going 70 in a 55. State trooper pointed out to me on the ticket the option of requesting a plea deal online.  Literally took about 30 seconds and within 2 days I got a response from the DA offering an improper equipment violation instead. Paid the fine online and avoided court and lawyers. Officer told me it was something fairly new and the lawyers hate it because it cuts them out of the equation and saves people a lot of time and money. 

Not sure if that is an option in your case but look into it and if it is, I recommend going that route. 

Yep, good old taxation via citation. 

I live right up the mountain from Morrison, CO which is one of the worst examples of this. Over half of the town's revenue is generated by traffic citations. They run this same racket. Just pay the ticket before your court date and it's automatically reduced to improper equipment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Johnny Rockets said:

The last ticket I got was in Cabarrus county a few months ago going 70 in a 55. State trooper pointed out to me on the ticket the option of requesting a plea deal online.  Literally took about 30 seconds and within 2 days I got a response from the DA offering an improper equipment violation instead. Paid the fine online and avoided court and lawyers. Officer told me it was something fairly new and the lawyers hate it because it cuts them out of the equation and saves people a lot of time and money. 

Not sure if that is an option in your case but look into it and if it is, I recommend going that route. 

I read about that this morning. You can cut your speed to 9 mph over. I don't think your insurance goes up at 9, but I wasn't sure if you still received points on your license. I'll need to look into it a little bit more. I worry about going through the hassle, it not working, and then still having to lawyer up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Get a printed out copy of your nice, clean driving record.

2. Show up for court the day you've been assigned.

3. Talk to the state's lawyer as you are called up to face the judge, and ask that they consider your nice, clean driving record and say something along the lines of you "not wanting to be financially penalized over the span of three years for an honest mistake" and that you "have demonstrated that you are a safe, aware driver" with your nice, clean driving record.

If you get a good draw on who you're talking to/dealing with that day, they might reduce it to something like "improper equipment" or dismiss the charge completely. You might still have to pay court costs (not sure what they are there) if you get it reduced or thrown out, but it should be less than a lawyer would charge you.

You don't HAVE to pay a lawyer to represent you. It is merely a convenience thing for most people.

At worst, if they deny your attempts at getting the charge reduced to something that won't add points to your license, you can ask for a Prayer for Judgement or a continuance to buy you more time to just go out and find a lawyer that will get it dismissed for you.

A speeding ticket really isn't much of anything, especially if you are willing to face the state/judge and demonstrate you're a responsible adult that is capable of handling your own business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Johnny Rockets said:

The last ticket I got was in Cabarrus county a few months ago going 70 in a 55. State trooper pointed out to me on the ticket the option of requesting a plea deal online.  Literally took about 30 seconds and within 2 days I got a response from the DA offering an improper equipment violation instead. Paid the fine online and avoided court and lawyers. Officer told me it was something fairly new and the lawyers hate it because it cuts them out of the equation and saves people a lot of time and money. 

Not sure if that is an option in your case but look into it and if it is, I recommend going that route. 

I believe this is what you were talking about: https://www.obsentinel.com/news/new-online-system-makes-processing-speeding-tickets-faster-easier/article_bc4761ee-be4a-11e7-aad8-7b21ad15c3b8.html

This is the part that scares me:

Quote

 If the district attorney offers an online reduction, the reduced charge, in the district attorney’s discretion, will be nine miles over the posted limit or improper equipment. 

If it gets dropped due to improper equipment, then I just pay the fine and I'm good. If it gets reduced to 9 mph over, it won't affect my insurance, but I think I still get points on my license. That's what I need to look into.

Edit: Just found this: A 9-over reduction does lead to a speeding conviction with two to three license points accumulated (2 points if the speed limit is less than 55 mph and 3 points if the speed limit is more than 55 mph), but these points will not impact your insurance premium if you have no active license points and would be removed from your driving record after three years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really should just go in person rather than dealing with any kind of online convenience thing IMHO.

I had a DA's rep once act like he didn't understand why I was showing him my driving record (which wasn't spot free by any means) and what exactly I wanted him to do for me.

I literally said:

"Look, sir. I've provided you with evidence that I am a somewhat safe and responsible driver, with both my driving record and by me being here today. I might have been going a little fast that day (12 mph over the limit,) but that choice should not impact me financially in the form of insurance hikes, etc. over the next three years."



He then turned to the judge and said, "Judge, the state moves to reduce these charges to improper equipment."

I paid my court costs (it was like 4-5 years ago, and I think it was to the tune of $185) and was on my way as if nothing ever happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Arroz con Panther said:

I believe this is what you were talking about: https://www.obsentinel.com/news/new-online-system-makes-processing-speeding-tickets-faster-easier/article_bc4761ee-be4a-11e7-aad8-7b21ad15c3b8.html

This is the part that scares me:

If it gets dropped due to improper equipment, then I just pay the fine and I'm good. If it gets reduced to 9 mph over, it won't affect my insurance, but I think I still get points on my license. That's what I need to look into.

Edit: Just found this: A 9-over reduction does lead to a speeding conviction with two to three license points accumulated (2 points if the speed limit is less than 55 mph and 3 points if the speed limit is more than 55 mph), but these points will not impact your insurance premium if you have no active license points and would be removed from your driving record after three years. 

That is odd because I was offered improper equipment and no points on my license. I wouldn't take 9 mph over, as that will be points on your license and with your clean driving record you should get nothing. I mentioned it because it worked for me and was extremely convenient and took about 5 mins of my time and some $ but much less than a layer would have cost me.   If that isn't going to work for you, show up as Bronn said. I just liked that I got the same outcome without any of the hassle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yep, good old taxation via citation. 

I live right up the mountain from Morrison, CO which is one of the worst examples of this. Over half of the town's revenue is generated by traffic citations. They run this same racket. Just pay the ticket before your court date and it's automatically reduced to improper equipment. 

 Maybe some see it as a racket but I was legit speeding so I only have myself to blame and appreciated the convenience. No court, no lawyers, no hassle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Johnny Rockets said:

 Maybe some see it as a racket but I was legit speeding so I only have myself to blame and appreciated the convenience. No court, no lawyers, no hassle. 

It doesn't necessarily automatically qualify as a racket, but when you have municipalities that are literally funding their existence through traffic citations and create a streamlined method to collecting those "taxes" to encourage quick payment and discourage any resistance then yeah, I think that qualifies as a racket. The state of Colorado tried a couple of years ago to enact legislation limiting the percentage of revenue a municipality can drive through traffic citations but it failed. Some states have similar laws already on the books.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got a ticket some years back on 485, like a 85 in a 65 at that time.    I went into the Mecklenberg courthouse, got in line, and a guy was walking down the line looking at your ticket.    Took mine, marked it to 7 over and said go there and pay fine.    I went and paid fine, and then left.     Basically he was going down the line doing it for everyone.

I wouldn't worry about a lawyer honestly, just go in there and take care of your business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They're examples of denying reality. Here are some others: ,- Bryce is the worst QB in the NFL right now (no he isn't) - Bryce is the worst QB in NFL history (no he's not; that's stupid) - Well then Bryce is at least the the worst QB in the league over the last three years (nope, he's actually improved a lot since year one, which was a turbulent year anyway) - That's not true, he hasn't Improved one but since his rookie year (oh come on) 🙄 - Well, even if he did, we can't win with him (obviously we can) - Yeah but not unless everyone else is damn near perfect (think the game film from our wins this year would back that up?) - Even so, we won those games in spite of him (officially the stupidest argument available) And no, those are made up. You can find those quotes and other equally moronic statements in various threads around the board. I know some folks always need to characterize whatever they're against as the worst thing in existence. It's hyperbole, and it's hypersilly. Likewise, you've got some who are so absolutely emotional about it that even if you think Bryce isn't good enough (which I do) they'll still call you a stan if you don't agree to label him the lousiest passer in existence 🙄 It's just dumb, and it's not realistic. But on the flipside, here are some statements which are; - Bryce is indeed capable of both playing in, and winning, an NFL game. Not on a consistent level though, and consistency is huge. - He is also capable of completing mid-range and even some deep passes; hell, he threw a beauty this past Sunday  - Yes, he has improved over his rookie season and over last year. Arguing against that is disingenuous. - Believe it or not, other players are the roster do make mistakes in games also.  - And lastly, while I know it hurts some people's narrative and arguments, Bryce does indeed deserve credit for the winning games he's played in this season. ... Every single one of those statements is true. And since i acknowledge all that, I must be in favor of keeping him in place then Except I'm not 😕 ... Don't know of anyone who doesn't think he'll get the fifth year option. Not ready to guarantee anything beyond that, though. So bottom line: Yeah, Bryce is fully expected to be our quarterback through next year. If there were a logical, realistic path to acquire a more capable starter and transition Bryce to a backup I'd be elated, but that's a pipe dream. This where we're at  I don't **** it, you don't like it, others don't either. But here We are so let's make the best of it that we can.
    • What does it matter how fast the wrs are with Bryce he is not hitting them anyway
    • Let's be real. Signing Matt Kalil who was at the time inconsistent at best was always an extremely risky move and largely initiated by the fact he was related to one of our most prominent players Ryan Kalil. Memories get fuzzy the longer time passes I guess. Go watch some old Panthers games with Ted Ginn nearly losing us games. Then watch Cam Newton keep going back to him again and again and again. Then read all the Xavier Legette criticism while making excuses for Bryce being swept by rookie 2nd round pick Tyler Shough. Throwing TMac under the bus is just further proof how deranged the Bryce Young defense force has become. Bryce Young can barely compete in this gutter iteration of the NFC South. Let's see him take this WR core to the playoffs in an NFC South with Drew Brees and Matt Ryan
×
×
  • Create New...