Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jake Peetz named new RB coach


ncfan

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

This guy has experience as a position coach...for quarterbacks.

A few years ago, Andy Reid made Juan Castillo his defensive coordinator. Castillo had never been anything but an offensive line coach, but Reid figured since he was a smart guy, he could make the adjustment.

That decision helped get them both fired.

The idea is to ascend up the ladder. That's how it works, but generally speaking you have to at least have some qualification for the position.

If you wanted to make this guy the assistant runningbacks coach and hire someone with experience to be the full-fledged runningbacks coach, I could get behind that.

Handing him the keys to what's become one of our most important positions? Not so much.

Belichick went from special teams coach to linebackers coach to defensive coordinator.  Andy Reid was once both a offensive line and tight end coach.  Josh McDaniels was once a defensive assistant.  And that's just three big names off top of my head.  Coaches coach different positions/groups all the time.

Hell, Jim Skipper was a DBs coach for some in college.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rivera hires an experienced retread?  "Typical Rivera.  Not willing to go outside of the box."

Rivera does what another poster literally suggested above and hires someone as an assistant so they can learn and go up the ladder?  "Wow, Rivera playing favorites and loyalty.  Typical Rivera."

Rivera hires a young outside mind from a strong program.  "He has no experience."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Mage said:

Belichick went from special teams coach to linebackers coach to defensive coordinator.  Andy Reid was once both a offensive line and tight end coach.  Josh McDaniels was once a defensive assistant.  Coaches coach different positions/groups all the time.

Belichick's progression is a pretty natural one, actually.

As to Reid, OL and TE coaches switch off a lot. Our old OC Jeff Davidson did both in his career. And you're talking about McDaniels at the start of his career when he was just assistant level. plus, I'd throw in that you're talking about guys who have excelled at pretty much every level.

Do we have any evidence that this guy has stood out anywhere?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Waldo said:

Wasn't in the NFL, doing non coaching at Alabama but I'm sure you proved some kind of point in your head.

Your post implied you wanted him to hire someone you had heard of.  And I'm saying I doubt you have heard of 99% of the position coaches in the NFL, so why does it matter?  You act as if he hasn't coached in the NFL before, which he has.  

And where do you think coaches come from?  They have to start somewhere.  Who cares if he was in college?  Nobody complained when we hired Lance Taylor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Do we have any evidence that this guy has stood out anywhere?

Do you have any evidence that 99% of position coaches stood out anywhere before they were hired for their first big job?  What a ridiculous question.  

You are complaining about a minuscule "issue".  Coaches have to start out somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Neither had Zimmer.

"Experience" doesn't necessarily mean "head coaching experience".

 

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

This guy has experience as a position coach...for quarterbacks.

A few years ago, Andy Reid made Juan Castillo his defensive coordinator. Castillo had never been anything but an offensive line coach, but Reid figured since he was a smart guy, he could make the adjustment.

That decision helped get them both fired.

The idea is to ascend up the ladder. That's how it works, but generally speaking you have to at least have some qualification for the position.

If you wanted to make this guy the assistant runningbacks coach and hire someone with experience to be the full-fledged runningbacks coach, I could get behind that.

Handing him the keys to what's become one of our most important positions? Not so much.

 

5 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

You're saying we should just have faith that the guy whose history includes naming Mike Shula, Eric Washington and Richard Rodgers to our major coordinator positions knows what he's doing?

Yeah, sure...

So....by your own logic, why are you constantly trashing Rivera’s decision to promote Washington to Defensive Coordinator? You think 7 largely successful seasons as our d-line coach (arguably the most important part of a defense) doesn’t qualify him as having:

a) Ascended up the ladder, and

b) Some qualification for the position

?

Or are you really gonna drag that decision through the mud simply because it ultimately didn’t work out? What a nice little bubble of infallibility you must live in where you can just sit back and wait to see if a decision pans out or not, and then retrospectively go back and trash it as being a display of poor judgment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mage said:

Rivera hires an experienced retread?  "Typical Rivera.  Not willing to go outside of the box."

Rivera does what another poster literally suggested above and hires someone as an assistant so they can learn and go up the ladder?  "Wow, Rivera playing favorites and loyalty.  Typical Rivera."

Rivera hires a young outside mind from a strong program.  "He has no experience."

Bullsh-t.

When Norv Turner was hired, it was pretty much universally hailed here. Ditto guys like Ricky Proehl and Sean McDermott. Hell, even Brady Hoke was accepted when he was named.

But again, we're talking about the guy who promoted schule and Washington and has done everything in his power to make sure that Richard Rodgers remains a coach in the NFL.

Rivera has more than enough staffing blunders on his resume' to invite his being questioned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

So....by your own logic, why are you constantly trashing Rivera’s decision to promote Washington to Defensive Coordinator? You think 7 largely successful seasons as our d-line coach (arguably the most important part of a defense) doesn’t qualify him as having:

a) Ascended up the ladder, and

b) Some qualification for the position

?

Or are you really gonna drag that decision through the mud simply because it ultimately didn’t work out? What a nice little bubble of infallibility you must live in where you can just sit back and wait to see if a decision pans out or not, and then retrospectively go back and trash it as being a display of poor judgment.

I didn't. At the time the decision happened, I was behind it, same as pretty much everybody.

But it turns out it wasn't a good decision. And yes, Ron Rivera gets the blame for that. Also for not doing something about it sooner when it was pretty obvious Washington wasn't up to the task.

It's better to have somebody who's experienced, but that doesn't guarantee success any more than anything else does.

And suggesting that just because somebody who had experience didn't work out we should therefore go with somebody else who doesn't have experience is just stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...