Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How the NFL sees us


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

For those who like to take an "us against the world" mentality, this might provide some fuel for your fire.

The bolded list below (and the Bills, mentioned in the prior paragraph) would constitute what the NFL seems to consider our "peer group" based on prime time scheduling.

PFT: Low expectations and populations

Quote

While the Bills are the only team shut outof national prime-time audiences this season, there are eight other teams who make a single appearance in the highest-profile games.

The Cardinals, Panthers, Bengals, Lions, Jaguars, Dolphins, Buccaneers, and Titans each make one appearance in a prime-time game.

Of that group, half of them are isolated into Thursdays early in the season when games are only shown on NFL Network, before the Fox national package kicks in (Panthers-Bucs in Week Two and Jaguars-Titans in Week Three). The Cardinals have a Thursday against the 49ers, while the Bengals, Lions and Dolphins appear on Mondays.

Part of the justification can be viewed through a competitive lens, as none of the eight single-dippers made the playoffs last year (and only the Panthers, Jaguars, and Titans made the postseason in 2017).

But the teams also represent some of the league’s smaller markets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

For those who like to take an "us against the world" mentality, this might provide some fuel for your fire.

The bolded list below (and the Bills, mentioned in the prior paragraph) would constitute what the NFL seems to consider our "peer group" based on prime time scheduling.

PFT: Low expectations and populations

They'll switch their lenses by Week 8. Keep Pounding!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has more to do with the team being in a small market than it does performance on the field. The Giants sucked last year but still have 3 primetime games. Sunday Night Football hasn't featured the Panthers since the tie-gate game where Derek Anderson threw a pick-6 to open up the game in Seattle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Palmetto said:

Win consistently

Problem solved 

exactly. the world doesn't care that we have a nice coach and that  we more or less like our teams. 

there is only one thing that matters...winning. You want respect, earn it. Win every year...not every other year.

being mediocre and having potential doesn't mean poo. winning matters. we get the respect or disrespect we deserve. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Has more to do with the team being in a small market than it does performance on the field. The Giants sucked last year but still have 3 primetime games. Sunday Night Football hasn't featured the Panthers since the tie-gate game where Derek Anderson threw a pick-6 to open up the game in Seattle. 

They have no problem putting Green Bay (the smallest market if I'm not mistaken) in Prime Time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Palmetto said:

Win consistently

Problem solved 

Exactly... that is the only way we are going to get prime time games... it really is as simple as that...

And it depends of what we have done the year before... and honestly speaking, this team has consistently crapped the bed in prime time over the last few years.

Atlanta is the only media market in the NFC South that even moves the needle, and they aren't consistently on prime time b/c of the percentage of transplants and the lukewarm support overall of the team.  And like us, the general inconsistency...

New Orleans is relevant b/c they are winning... once Brees is gone, they are on par with the Bills in terms of media market, despite what the deluded swampers think.  And to be honest, New Orleans in the Brees era always seems to put up offense no matter what- that matters to a national audience and to ratings.

Green Bay and Pittsburgh are somewhat outliers in that they punch way above their market size b/c of their national fanbases (and both have been good and have elite QBs).

So much of it does come down to market size and fanbase size... Dallas is almost always going to get 5 games no matter what... The Giants are still getting 3 games despite maybe being the worst team in the league b/c they are New York.  The Patriots were not a fixture in prime time before the Belichick/Brady era.

The Browns have a lot of attention this year, but if they revert back to mediocrity they will be MIA from prime time next year.  As with a lot of the "sexy" teams going into this year... if you're not big market, you are always on thin-ice in terms of being in prime time.

Bottom line is the Panthers have to consistently win the previous year to get prime time games the next.. no getting around... and that's not unfair... TV people care about ratings... and the only way the Panthers generate ratings is being good... just like over half the teams in the league.

Being a "younger team" without consistent success, the Panthers really punch below their media market size... The Panthers are in a growing market with good local fan support and an owner that will spend... this is wonderful for us as fans, and it ensures the long-term viability of the Panthers staying in the Carolinas, but it's not going to translate to national TV without winning

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Completely agree, but Raiders and Browns got a ton and they haven’t won consistently. I get the Browns bc all the hype, but Oakland?

The Las Vegas drama...and Gruden.

it's also fair to say that the Raiders have been around a lot longer than us and have a legitimate national fan base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, trueblade said:

They have no problem putting Green Bay (the smallest market if I'm not mistaken) in Prime Time.

It's a totally unique situation because of the historical stature of the team and national fanbase... much like Pittsburgh, they punch way above their media market in terms of national interest in the team.  Plus, for the most part, year in and year out they are good and in competition for the playoffs.

Detroit is a much bigger media market but doesn't sniff prime time near as much b/c of their consistent mediocrity.

Green Bay & Pittsburgh are outliers in that there is much more national interest relative to their market size.

On the flip side, Atlanta, Detroit, and Miami are large media markets without large national fanbases.  Seatlle was kind of in that same boat until the last 10-15 years when they started having consistent success.  Miami has fallen off b/c they have went 30 years without being good.

Dallas is an interesting case b/c they have somehow maintained a massive national fanbase despite 20+ years of mediocrity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Completely agree, but Raiders and Browns got a ton and they haven’t won consistently. I get the Browns bc all the hype, but Oakland?

Last year In Oakland

Three first round picks

Antonio Brown , John Gruden

NFL also loves drama 

2020   Vegas Opener will be Thursday for Monday night

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Those were the days lol 
    • Have you even been reading my posts?  I'm not so sure because you seem to insinuate that I'm expecting some monster year 1 season, but I've time and time again said I'm only expecting 800 yards from him as a rookie.  Because like you said, it's not in his control, we have a bunch of good receiving options and two 1k yard RBs in what should be a run first offense. And yes, I'm very much a T-Mac homer, I've never once denied it, I'm an Arizona alumni who has been open about that from the very first thread I made about him over 18 months ago. But that doesn't mean I'm blindly expecting him to be an All Pro as a rookie, I just know more about his game than most people here who watch his highlights and breakdowns.  Which generally focus on the things he does best and worst to highlight his best abilities (his downfield contested catches) and where he needs to improve (separation) as those are the two things fans care most about when talking about the draft. What those breakdowns don't cover much are the "boring and mundane" things he does very well and exactly what you are talking about needing for Bryce.   He was constantly used in the short passing game, whether they be WR screens or quick slants, to get the ball in his hands and let him make plays, it's why he was 5th in the Big 12 in YAC last year.  With his size and hands, when he runs a quick 5 yard slant in front of the defender and the QB delivers the ball on time with anticipation, creating buckets of separation isn't needed, he's going to make the catch and then get some YAC for a 1st down.  Go watch the 30 minute YT videos that string together every catch he made last year (or the same thing from 2023) and you'll see those plays constantly, but in the analyst breakdowns leading into the draft those things don't get discussed as much as the big plays and then the things he needs to work on, because they're just not as "sexy" to talk about as those. Per your ask... He has 3 main things he needs to improve upon, and again, "needing to improve" doesn't mean "he's terrible" at them, just things he can get better at, like all young players have things to work on. 1.  His get off at the snap.   For all the amazing things he did for us at Arizona, this was always the thing that would frustrate me the most, as he generally was a bit slow to fire off the line.  The nice thing is even in the minimal clips we've seen from rookie mini camp, his initial fire off the line already appears to have been sped up a lot, he clearly has been working on that in the lead up to the draft. 2.  His separation Yea, he's not a 6' quick twitch athlete, so his separation is never going to be at the level of a Chase or Jefferson.  I've always admitted that, but because he's not one of those guys, he also brings a lot of things that those others can't.  His catch radius and hands are why I'm not as concerned about his separation, because he's so good at making those contested catches by snatching the ball away from his body to where the defender can't get to it to break it up. But yes, he does still need to get better here, just as all rookies have things to improve upon. 3.  Using his body more physically This is something that he did at times, but he also is just a great athlete for his size and would often rely on his physical abilities to make defenders miss him in the open field than just power through them, which is fine in college.  But yes, at the next level, as he gets older and stronger, I'd like to see him use it more like Evans does, and that will come with time as he builds strength and develops that part of his game. Again, I implore you to to spend an hour watching those "Every catch from the X season" for his last two years in college.  If/when you do, I think you're going to be very surprised by the number of times we used him in the short passing game and let him gain YAC to move the ball down the field.
×
×
  • Create New...