Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Burns is way too small to be effectiveeeee.....!!!!!!!


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

Rivera was asked if he would be a starter and said no basically during the presser. Said he would come in and mix up what they are doing. Have a long career. 

lolololololool *breathe* lolololoolololol

 

we took a 3rd down speed rusher at 16 with no plans to make him start?

 

oh this is getting better and better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vonn is almost 2 inches shorter and only 3 lbs lighter. He also put on some more heft in the pros. 

Burns' weight is a legit concern. His athleticism is not.

Hopefully his weight isn't an issue much like Jackson last year, however skinny men in the trenches tend to get pushed around more often than not. 

He won't be able to run around everyone in the pros. Everyone is fast in the NFL. If he can add some weight to his frame while still maintaining his explosiveness, then he'll be a monster.

Athleticism wise, the Miller comparison is legitimate. Body type wise, it is not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

lolololololool *breathe* lolololoolololol

 

we took a 3rd down speed rusher at 16 with no plans to make him start?

 

oh this is getting better and better.

This is what I'm afraid of. That's why I liked the comparison to Danielle Hunter better than Von Miller. The comparison to Miller would make him a situational player. The comparison to Hunter would make him starting in both schemes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Cant rule out the possibility of that rookie doghouse with Rivera. For all we know he may get only 15 snaps a game. I dont trust Rivera.

I told you there weren't many plug and play DEs/OLBs in this draft. Same with OTs. I don't want a rookie starting so I am okay with this.  Starting rookies is always a crap shoot.  We have a better chance to get a FS/corner starter in the second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

Vonn is almost 2 inches shorter and only 3 lbs lighter. He also put on some more heft in the pros. 

Burns' weight is a legit concern. His athleticism is not.

Hopefully his weight isn't an issue much like Jackson last year, however skinny men in the trenches tend to get pushed around more often than not. 

He won't be able to run around everyone in the pros. Everyone is fast in the NFL. If he can add some weight to his frame while still maintaining his explosiveness, then he'll be a monster.

Athleticism wise, the Miller comparison is legitimate. Body type wise, it is not. 

Yeah, it's the slight frame in the lower body that concerns me more than the upper body.  His legs look incredibly thin...  I'm hoping he can put on a little more bulk there.  Either way, I have a feeling he is gonna be a great player for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

look, I’m a long time season ticket holder   I don’t want him to fail  just calling it as I see it 

He looks very very thin.in his lower body  and we have seen the Panthers do this before with Haynes and others 

 He better have great balance and be very fast as the strength of many OTs in this league will tear his ass up   This isn’t the ACC 

i hope he is all Rivera and Hurney think he is for the team and the fans    

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Yeah, it's the slight frame in the lower body that concerns me more than the upper body.  His legs look incredibly thin...  I'm hoping he can put on a little more bulk there.  Either way, I have a feeling he is gonna be a great player for us.

Dude is crazy flexible with great bend. He has the talent, he just needs to grow into his body. If he can't, he'll run into some issues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Prime said:

What!!! If burns can get significantly stronger this off-season we could be looking at a guy who's challenging Bosa and Quennin for defensive rookie of the year... Theres no way you guys are upset right? I see this kid completely dominating.

Yeah, and if MJ can just connect on that curve ball, he's the next Babe Ruth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like Burns.  Playing him on the edge as a stand up guy from multiple parts of the front is going to be his strength.  He's got great quickness and burst, and he will win many battles by being just faster than the other guy.  Once he gets some more strength and how to use his hands, he's going to be a terror.

Could he fail?  Sure, but there's no use in wanting him to fail to try to get a new GM and coach.  I think that Burns does some things now that will be great in sub packages that will allow him to get on the field.  Then he can take over next year.  Just remember that his primary job is going to be rushing the passer, which he is very good at doing.

Was he better than Sweat?  I don't know.  Sweat is an undeniable NFL talent, but I heard someone say in the draft run up this week that he's very prickly and doesn't like to be yelled at.  I think that had something to do there as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Prime said:

I got you but this is a guy who's in the 97th percentile for all his combined measurements... There are lots of average to slightly above average pass rushers. But burns is a little more special. Just slightly...

I've heard it all already.  I didn't wake up look at the TV and be like "wuuut".

Hes a good prospect, high ceiling guy.  But since when do we take projects in the 1st?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a big difference is Von Miller played pretty close to his combine weight. Played his last season at A&M at 240. Burns was around 220. He put on nearly 30 pounds for the combine. 

Miller also demonstrated his fantastic strength on tape at A&M. He’s always played with it and it’s what sets up his speed and sets him apart. Guys like Mack and Miller transition from speed to power so well.

None of that means Burns won’t succeed. Just means he needs to play at 250. Not show up to test at 250. And he won’t only win with speed in the NFL. Ask Vic Beasley. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Wow, didn't catch that!  I don't think Chuba's a power back either but he's usually good at getting that 1 or 2 yards. That was an uncharacteristic day for him.
    • The referee assigned to this game is Shawn Smith. This is a critical data point for betting purposes because his crew has one of the most distinct, long-term statistical biases in the NFL. "Road Team" Bias: Historically, Shawn Smith is known as the "Road Team Referee." In a league where home teams usually win ~55% of the time, home teams in Smith's games have historically won at a rate far below league average (often hovering around 40-42%). Against The Spread (ATS): The trend is even starker here. Home teams have covered the spread at a rate of roughly 37-40% in his career. The Mechanism: Analysis shows his crew tends to call a higher rate of False Start and Unnecessary Roughness penalties on the Home Team. This negates the traditional home-field advantage (crowd noise causing false starts for the visitors). Impact on This Game: This specific assignment heavily favors the Buccaneers (Road Team). If you believe the referee influences the game, Smith's presence suggests the Panthers will struggle to get "home cooking" calls and may face untimely procedural flags that stall drives. The Panthers have only had Shawn Smith officiate four home games since he became a head referee in 2018, and they are all losses. Date Opponent Result Score Nov 24, 2024 vs. Kansas City Chiefs Loss 27–30 Oct 9, 2022 vs. San Francisco 49ers Loss 15–37 Dec 12, 2021 vs. Atlanta Falcons Loss 21–29 Nov 25, 2018 vs. Seattle Seahawks Loss 27–30   Considering the how rare it is for Shawn Smith to officiate a Panthers game at all, this seems like an odd time to assign him to a Panthers game, unless the NFL wants to kill the Panthers season once and for all.  The Panthers' offensive line situation creates a "perfect storm" for referee Shawn Smith's specific tendency to call False Starts on the home team. The "Carousel" Factor (Communication Vulnerability) The most damning stat for the Panthers' offensive line in 2025 is their lack of continuity. The Stat: By Week 13, the Panthers had already fielded their 10th different offensive line combination. The Impact: False starts are often "communication penalties"—they happen when a guard doesn't hear the center's snap count or a tackle anticipates the wrong cadence. A unit that hasn't played together struggles with non-verbal communication. The Shawn Smith Multiplier: Shawn Smith’s crew calls False Starts at a high rate on home teams. He will likely look for flinches on the exterior of the line. A disjointed line that is constantly rotating players (due to the injuries of starters like Cade Mays and the illness issues with Robert Hunt earlier this season) is "fresh meat" for this specific referee bias. The Specific Culprits (2025 Penalties) Ikem Ekwonu (LT): Leads the team with 4 False Start penalties this season. He is the most frequent violator on the line. Taylor Moton (RT): Has been flagged for 3 False Starts. The Trap: Smith’s crew often focuses on the tackles (the players furthest from the ball) jumping early to get an edge on speed rushers. Since Ekwonu struggles with this discipline naturally, having a referee who hunts for it is a massive disadvantage. The "Managed Outcome" Synthesis The "Bucs Cover" Script: If the desired outcome is a Buccaneers win to solidify their playoff standing, the officials simply have to apply the letter of the law. Calling strict False Starts on a confused, banged-up Panthers O-line will consistently put them in "3rd and Long" situations, killing their drives and allowing the Bucs (-3.5) to cover easily. The "Close Game" Script: If the desired outcome is "Week 18 Drama" (keeping the division tied), look for the officials to ignore the Panthers' twitchy tackles. If Ekwonu jumps a split-second early and no flag is thrown, it effectively neutralizes the Bucs' pass rush, allowing the Panthers to keep the score close. Summary of the Edge Vulnerability: Extreme. The Panthers are playing backup interior linemen (like Jake Curhan or practice squad call-ups) next to jumpy tackles. Betting Implication: This strongly reinforces the Bucs -3 or -3.5 play. The combination of a "Road Team Referee" and a "Home Team O-Line in chaos" suggests the Panthers will beat themselves with procedural penalties. Based on the collision of the hard data (Referee bias + Offensive Line injuries) and the soft narratives ("Managed Outcomes"), here is the definitive recommendation. If you have to place a single Moneyline bet to win this game straight up: The Pick: Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-165) While the "Entertainment Script" hints at a Panthers upset to keep the division messy, the structural disadvantage the Panthers face in this specific matchup is too massive to ignore. Here is why the Buccaneers are the stong moneyline play: 1. The "Shawn Smith" Road-Field Advantage This is the decisive factor. In the NFL, Home Field Advantage usually accounts for about 1.5 to 2 points of value. The Reality: Referee Shawn Smith negates that advantage entirely. His crew calls penalties in a way that historically suppresses home crowd momentum (False Starts, holding). The Result: You are essentially getting the Buccaneers on a neutral field (or even a "pseudo-home" field) against a team with a worse roster. 2. The "Drive-Killer" Synergy To win as an underdog, the Panthers need to play a clean, mistake-free game to keep drives alive. The combination of Panthers' 10th O-Line combo + Jump-prone Tackles (Ekwonu) + A Referee who hunts False Starts is a recipe for disaster. The Scenario: Expect the Panthers to face multiple "1st and 15" or "3rd and 12" situations due to procedural flags. These drive-killers will force them to punt or settle for field goals, while the Bucs' offense (led by Mayfield) stays on schedule. 3. The "TV Product" Counter-Argument You asked about the "Managed Outcome." While a Panthers win creates "chaos," the NFL also values Star Power in the playoffs. Baker Mayfield and the Buccaneers are a proven national TV draw with recent playoff history. If the league has to choose between "Chaos" (Panthers) and "Ratings/Legitimacy" (Bucs), the "Script" likely leans toward ensuring the Buccaneers—the more marketable team—secure the division lead. They won't "fix" the game against the Panthers, but they won't intervene to save them from their own penalties. Final Verdict Betting on the Panthers requires you to hope for a miracle 4th-quarter collapse. Betting on the Buccaneers requires you to trust that a superior roster—aided by a favorable officiating crew—will control the game for the first 45 minutes. Take the Buccaneers Moneyline. The "Safe" money is on the Ref. The Prediction: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Win and Cover Projected Score: Buccaneers 27, Panthers 17 The Bet: Buccaneers -3 (or Moneyline -165) Confidence Level: High on the Winner; Moderate on the Spread (due to potential "garbage time" variance).
×
×
  • Create New...