Carolina Panthers trade up to pick 37!!!

[bobcat91]

Ok so anymore moves or just some jag at around 100

[Carolina Cajun]

THIS is where us winning against the saints hurt us.  Say we did make the same trade, #41+100 would be more than enough capital to get the job done.

[rayzor]

he's done much worse trades. only lost one of our two 3rd rounders.

the guy is a legit OT as well. needs some coaching, but he's got the tools. 

not hating it at all. kind of (not really) surprised at the freaking out about the pick. pretty entertaining.

[PantherOnTheProwl1523]

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

he's done much worse trades. only lost one of our two 3rd rounders.

the guy is a legit OT as well. needs some coaching, but he's got the tools. 

not hating it at all. kind of (not really) surprised at the freaking out about the pick. pretty entertaining.

How many players did we get that had same issue with coaching and had tools. They still didn't play well and didn't work out though.

[L-TownCat]

Look, as long as we’re protecting Cam I can handle a bit of an unknown.

[rayzor]

2 minutes ago, rbsponsel52 said:

How many players did we get that had same issue with coaching and had tools. They still didn't play well and didn't work out though.

the thing is, this was basically a first round pick for us. this was a guy that we probably would have taken if burns wasn't there. this wasn't one of those whim/panic picks that hurney was so bad about making back in the day. this was one of those guys that he had slated for the first round and did his homework on. 

I don't trust a lot about hurney, but I trust the homework he does in the first round guys.

[carolinapanther]

Love the pick!

[Little Goody Two Shoes]

What did it cost us? 

 

 

[PantherOnTheProwl1523]

Just now, rayzor said:

the thing is, this was basically a first round pick for us. this was a guy that we probably would have taken if burns wasn't there. this wasn't one of those whim/panic picks that hurney was so bad about making back in the day. this was one of those guys that he had slated for the first round and did his homework on. 

I don't trust a lot about hurney, but I trust the homework he does in the first round guys.

It is good he wasn't that Hurney from back then or we would be royally screwed.

[Peon Awesome]

There has been a run on offensive lineman so maybe Hurney anticipated that. But I would've preferred taking one of the top safeties if Little was gone and taking the best tackle or guard left at 77.

That being said, if Little turns into an above average starter on the line, it'll turn into a solid move. But Hurney has a pretty terrible track record with jumping up for 2nd round picks that he has valued as first rounders. And we have enough holes I'm not a fan of losing such a valuable pick. We'll be able to grade this better in a year. I'm just not optimistic it'll be a win. But I really hope I'm wrong. 

[RumHam]

This draft gets a D so far. But its worth noting Person just basically copied Igo's posts for his

[rayzor]

2 minutes ago, rbsponsel52 said:

It is good he wasn't that Hurney from back then or we would be royally screwed.

the old hurney would have traded away next year's first. this one only cost us one of our two 3rds. i'm not hating this.  we needed serious help on the OL we've got it.