Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How anyone found video on Damien Jeanpierre ?


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, stbugs said:

Lol. He didn’t run a 4.25. He wasn’t even at the combine. A 4.25 would be the 4th fastest at the combine since 1999.

He didn’t say it was at the Combine. Players often run the 40 at their Pro Day as well. Athletes generally always time faster at their Pro Day since they’re timed manually with stop watches, but a 4.25 is still quite impressive for a Pro Day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

He didn’t say it was at the Combine. Players often run the 40 at their Pro Day as well. Athletes generally always time faster at their Pro Day since they’re timed manually with stop watches, but a 4.25 is still quite impressive for a Pro Day.

wait... soooo did he legit run a 4.25????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, stbugs said:

That makes way more sense. That’s still NFL fast. 4.25 is Chris Johnson lightning fast. 

You know there’s no such thing as an FCS Combine, right? What that guy is referring to is some database on a website where they’ve manually constructed a compilation of results from the Pro Days of prospects who didn’t participate in the actual Combine. In this case, the 4.44 seems to be a mistake since his 4.25 was published across a number of reputable sites like ESPN, and I have yet to see the 4.44 corroborated anywhere else.

If you just spent even 30 seconds on a Google search, you could read up on this guy for yourself a little...instead, you dismissed and criticized the OP’s factual statement and instead, took another poster’s misinformation as fact without even a second thought. What you’ve just demonstrated was the absolute perfect case study on confirmation bias.

 

As far as your personal response to me...there was honestly so much wrong there that I’m gonna have to tackle that one after dinner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stbugs said:

Let’s be serious. Who cares about a pro-day time? Real times say that unless he’s one of the 4 fastest guys in the NFL in past 20 years saying he ran a 4.25 is just plain BS.

Funchess “ran” a 4.47 at his pro day and a 4.7 at the combine. Which one looked accurate over the past 4 years? More than likely this guy runs in the 4.4s and nowhere close to 4.25.

It’s amazing the lengths that people go to not criticize players brought in by the current regime. If he just gets to Byrd’s stats, that would be exceeding expectations. 

will ferrell anchorman GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damion Jeanpiere Jr., Nicholls, WR, 5-11, 170

Speaking of sizzling 40s, Jeanpiere clocked 4.25 at his pro day (plus, 6.41 in the 5-10-5 short shuttle). NFL Draft Scout says the blazer has the "it" factor because "he is tough to tackle and he can't be caught if he gets a step." Jeanpiere has excellent ball skills and averaged over 18 yards per reception in his career.

 

Intersting dude.  Not sure if he would run an official 4.25 but he seems to be a burner at least.  Love the underdog guys this time of year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a cool article on him.  States he ran a 4.48 there. 

Damion Jeanpiere, WR, Nicholls State #3

6002, 185, 4.48


Notes: From Kenner, LA. Majoring in petroleum engineering. Caught 7-199-1 in five games as a true freshman in 2015, before a season-ending injury. Started all 11 games and caught 37-505-6 in 2016. Caught 40-770-4 in 2017.

Positives: Nice height, speed and separation. Good hands. Adjusts to and plucks the ball. Good feet, body control and athleticism. Uses his body nicely to shield defenders from the ball. Shifty, nifty, darting runner after the catch. Good run vision and change of direction in the open field. Shows very good field awareness and instincts. Good work ethic.

Negatives: Needs some strength work and overall skill refinement. Productive, but did not truly dominate at a lower level of competition.

Summary: Has a legitimate NFL toolset to make the jump to the next level. Would likely be much more highly regarded at a major-college program with a prolific passing attack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, stbugs said:

Let’s be serious. Who cares about a pro-day time? Real times say that unless he’s one of the 4 fastest guys in the NFL in past 20 years saying he ran a 4.25 is just plain BS.

Funchess “ran” a 4.47 at his pro day and a 4.7 at the combine. Which one looked accurate over the past 4 years? More than likely this guy runs in the 4.4s and nowhere close to 4.25.

It’s amazing the lengths that people go to not criticize players brought in by the current regime. If he just gets to Byrd’s stats, that would be exceeding expectations. 

He already pointed out that an athlete's pro day time isn't as accurate. You want a bone for making the same point and acting like you are teaching him something?

For someone who wasn't invited to the combine, the pro day is the only 40 we have. How many people clock a 4.25 at their pro day? I would bet very few. Does it mean absolutely nothing? Even if he's closer to a 4.4, that's a damn good time for a wr. Would put him in the top 10% for a wr easily.

Also, what's the point in criticizing a training camp body? He'll be lucky to make the team. Does it make you feel like a big man to belittle any potential he might have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Biggdaddi1022 said:

I looked everywhere and have not been able to find any footage of this WR we signed.... I was curious because he ran a 4.25

Nah l looked at his highlight tape there and that isn't 4.25 speed. To many CBs running stride for stride with him at the 1aa level no less. Notice how all his big play catches they tackle him as he makes the deep catch,even when he breaks free he isn't a catch and gone,he has to reverse field and shake and all kind of stuff. 4.25(see hollywood brown) one catch and its enough...gone..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I hope we're not going all in this year. We couldn't outright win our own division with a losing record. We had 2 anomalous wins. Typically you aren't going to win scoring 13 and have your opponent have an absolute train wreck offense.  Also, a team scoring 16 on 6 trips to the red zone is not normal either. I'm not trying to be a pessimist. We're not there. Bryce isn't there. Most of the year our offense legitimately struggled and the missing piece wasn't a TE. Keep building through the draft and reasonable FA. When we have a team that's on the edge of being able to make a legitimate SB run, then go all in. Otherwise, going all in right now feels like another Bryce situation. Sell out and pray. That's not how consistent winners are built. 
    • XL might never reach his full potential here but I think he does have a legitimate shot at becoming a pretty good #2-3. We knew when we picked him that he was raw but his athletic traits were hard to pass on.  I still remember coming here and telling 85% of huddlers to not give up on DB yet after his first couple of years here.  I just knew DB was going to special. I wouldn't put XL in that exact same category but I wouldn't write him off yet. I think our playcalling is also working against his strengths.  At the very least, we should have a servicable #3 receiver w/ speed between XL, Horn Jr, and Meetchie. 
    • I think we haven't praised Morgan/tilis enough. In this thread we have some huddles best and its hard to figure out what to do with the 19th pick, if you understand that. Im also posting what "I" believe they are doing and what I feel is best. Those FA signess send a clear signal- They are going all-in to win this coming season. If you factor that in, just believe it first, it 100% changes what going on with pick 19, cause 51st pick doesn't matter as the talent level drop is petty big between the two. So 19 is the biggest difference maker on the current plan of all-in for the 2026.  Then you factor in who will be there at, (I better hold off on my other strong thought here- I think trade up is the best help too, yes using that 3rd to do so too...) DT, ILB(Allen? he didn't run), OC, QB(ooo my I don't want to rage drool my hate again about how I feel here, plus F it draft TY simp not joking)....... those 4 groups don't have the "BPA" at 19. You can add ILB Hill in there, but I feel 19 just is too high, other disagree.  Slot or TE it is......Kenyon is the only TE worth a 1st and he's the classic draft dilemma- All sort of he's a top ten lock to he's a non-blocking one trick WR that's not even worth 2nd currency. Then there's he's the clear winner from the TE group, thus increases his value more no matter the opinion.  Honestly I see the Matt Millen outcome as the current odds favorite, I think the huddle would go bonkers for weeks as result......just the truth tho, WR had the highest odds to be the clear BPA and slot is a need...plus if we are talking about Walker being a one year deal, Coker is a one year too(he may have another controll yr, I got to confirm it tho). Plus God forbid Tmac gets hurt, the drop in talent from him or Coker to Moore is fuging scary, I'd say more than the recent OT stone fellow. It goes back back to adding talent no matter what, draft now help, and where are  the weak points are in the system you want to run....  
×
×
  • Create New...