Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Uh, why did we trade Jenkins again??


Foxmustgo

Recommended Posts

Just ignore it, it seems like everyone else is. If I cover the sun up with my finger. it isn't there. While I don't agree with you on Jenkins, there is a problem that no wants to acknowledge. I just wish I knew what it was, but to off on a rant will not accomplish anything, so calm down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just ignore it, it seems like everyone else is. If I cover the sun up with my finger. it isn't there. While I don't agree with you on Jenkins, there is a problem that no wants to acknowledge. I just wish I knew what it was, but to off on a rant will not accomplish anything, so calm down.

The problem of DT depth ? That has been around all season.

It just finally bit us in the ass last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh thats right, because like me, he is a realist and pointed out the faults with the team

but the Panties front office didnt like that and shipped him out

I guarantee you we wouldn't have been gashed if Jenkins were still here

So, if we treat you like garbage, will you fuging leave too.

You have to be the biggest fugtard posting on the internet. Get a clue...everyone here could care less what you have to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jenkins was a fatass whiner who was paid millions to booze it up on IR only to take a gigantic sh*t on the city and the fans who all but sign his paycheck. I hope he enjoys his living room and 72" plasma in January while we're still playing. The Jets are on borrowed time with Favre and once they need to retool and go through a bad season or two, Jenkins will be back to his old self.

He always showed up to training camp overweight, he always skipped as many OTAs as permissible, and he just tore apart the locker room with his attitude. News flash: we've gone to the playoffs once with a healthy Jenkins. Without him, we've gone twice including this year. The dude was a good player but he's not worth the trouble he brought when he was having one of his little fits. I've had enough of the backwards looking horsesh*t. We're going to the playoffs, and we're doing it playing John Fox football for better or for worse. Take it or leave it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh thats right, because like me, he is a realist and pointed out the faults with the team

but the Panties front office didnt like that and shipped him out

I guarantee you we wouldn't have been gashed if Jenkins were still here

Do you ever think before you post?

You come off as someone who is about a case short of a 6 pack.

Jenkins was shopped around before the incident you mentioned. But you either are ignoring that fact, or just don't care about anything factual. You sound like a bitter little bitch whom is blaming anything you can, as long as it grasping at straws. Jenkins is gone cause he didn't want to be here, and the Panthers didn't want him here either.

We were gashed cause KEMO wasn't playing. You couldn't be any more ignorant if you tried.

(I wouldn't be surprised if you do end up saying something more ignorant now that I've made this post!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jenkins was a fatass whiner who was paid millions to booze it up on IR only to take a gigantic sh*t on the city and the fans who all but sign his paycheck. I hope he enjoys his living room and 72" plasma in January while we're still playing. The Jets are on borrowed time with Favre and once they need to retool and go through a bad season or two, Jenkins will be back to his old self.

He always showed up to training camp overweight, he always skipped as many OTAs as permissible, and he just tore apart the locker room with his attitude. News flash: we've gone to the playoffs once with a healthy Jenkins. Without him, we've gone twice including this year. The dude was a good player but he's not worth the trouble he brought when he was having one of his little fits. I've had enough of the backwards looking horsesh*t. We're going to the playoffs, and we're doing it playing John Fox football for better or for worse. Take it or leave it.

preach it brother. :lol:

/thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh thats right, because like me, he is a realist and pointed out the faults with the team

but the Panties front office didnt like that and shipped him out

I guarantee you we wouldn't have been gashed if Jenkins were still here

:beatdeadhorse5:

And I thought I was mental...

Geezus dude- calm the hell down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...