Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC / Norv Breakdown Quest for 2 000 yards


KaseKlosed

Recommended Posts

Roger Craig did the 1000/1000 deal in 1985. Still feel this realistic result for 22 at some point, but it would (by default) require a lack of production or injury from Moore and/or Samuel. 

Not sure how desirable that is.

 

A96ABBDB-04DE-4747-A039-6EBEE8D08A83.jpeg

82AF390D-C496-457C-8F18-5ED9D83BD287.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ellis said:

Roger Craig did the 1000/1000 deal in 1985. Still feel this realistic result for 22 at some point, but it would (by default) require a lack of production or injury from Moore and/or Samuel. 

Not sure how desirable that is.

 

A96ABBDB-04DE-4747-A039-6EBEE8D08A83.jpeg

82AF390D-C496-457C-8F18-5ED9D83BD287.jpeg

Go do the same for Marshall Faulk and the 99' Rams, its not like no one else on that team had receiving stats lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hoenheim said:

Go do the same for Marshall Faulk and the 99' Rams, its not like no one else on that team had receiving stats lmao

Rams had roughly 800 more passing yards in ‘99 than the 49ers did in ‘85. Yes, the Rams had a plethora of receivers.

65839C9B-F5D5-4B9D-9AF5-5D21907F3DF7.jpeg

F4F06800-1EF4-4B13-9B98-B6AC34204375.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/24/2019 at 5:11 PM, mjligon said:

 Same dude crying every day and tweeting borderline racist takes on his joke of a twitter feed about the CMC pick 2 years ago is starting threads about him potentially getting 2000 yards this season.

comical how these cats switch sides and I won’t let you forget it @KaseKlosed

You good bro? My beef was with Dave Gettlemans draft strategy. I believed he could of had not only cmc but a probowl player on the defensive side of the ball in those first 2 rounds. Also ppl were comparing cmc to barry sanders and other HOF running backs before he took his first carry in the NFL.  Lol it was out of hand. Cmc not even the best RB in his draft class. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/24/2019 at 12:55 PM, Hoenheim said:

SHOULD have gotten it last year, if Rivera didn't make him sit for part of the 2nd to last game and practically all of the last game of the season

You really wanted the Panthers to potentially risk him getting injured in a meaningless game after we were already eliminated from the playoffs? For some pretty numbers on a stat sheet in a losing season? Not worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Quoted rom one of the many Bryce threads... Wanted to reply to this, but since my answer turned into a go route (i.e. went long) I thought I'd put it in a separate thread. So here's my take on the names mentioned above (and others) ... Lance was a prototypical "take an athlete and teach him to play quarterback" example who now serves as an example of why that's a bad idea. Worth remembering that Lance was given to a coach heralded as a QB guru with a friendly system. In the end though, even that potentially ideal situation wasn't enough. And the fact those events were followed up by said guru taking his team to the Super Bowl with a QB who went undrafted helps bolster the folly.of that approach. But then you have Wilson, an actual quarterback with off the charts passing skill. This guy's sure to succeed, right? Well...wrong, which demonstrates that even the right skill set doesn't guarantee success.  Could Wilson have succeeded in a better situation under better coaching? Unknown, but it's a question I find myself asking a lot. (See also: Levis, Will) Rosen falls into the Ryan Leaf / Ryan Mallet category, i.e. don't hand the keys to your billion dollar franchise over to a dickhead. Character matters, and not strictly in the 'upright citizen vs thuggish criminal ' way. (I could add maybe don't draft guys with the first name 'Ryan' unless they went to Harvard, and even then only in the 7th round) Darnold is another guy who likely could have benefited from a better situation / coaching (see also Carr: David). Heck, it also might have helped to send him to The Wizard and have him ask for "da noiv", or perhaps to Egon Spengler and company to chase away any and all "ghosts". Sending him to Matt Rhule? 😬 Yeah...definitely not the answer 😕 But hey, at least he's doing better now. (ttill playoff time, anyway) Mind you, Drew Brees does serve as proof that guys who land in less than ideal - or just flat out lousy - situations early on can indeed resurrect their careers later on in better surroundings. Will Darnold go that far? Unknown, but we do know it's possible. Kenny Pickett (also known by the X-Men moniker 'Littlehand') is that proverbial great college quarterback who for one reason or another just doesn't cut it in the pros.  (gotta say, feels like the past several drafts have put forth a lot of that particular QB archetype) Mac Jones could arguably carry this label as well, though I'm waiting to see how things play out in San Francisco. For now, Jones might be a better example of why you should always be cautious and skeptical of guys from certain systems. Justin Fields is a cell in that spreadsheet column, as is Kyler Murray. Now I'm sure someone here will mention another certain quarterback we're all quite familiar with as a prime example of this subset too 😐 Fair point, though I think he, Murray and Tagovailoa work better under the heading of "Davids". What's a David? It's a guy you send to battle against a "Goliath". And by all means, bet on that guy if he's a shepherd.  If he's a quarterback, though? 🤔 Root for him, encourage him, appreciate his courage and be inspired by him... ...but don't draft him. The return on investment might be a great story, but it's not likely to be one that involves championships and rings. ... Bottom Line? You've no doubt heard this saying "this ain't rocket science".  Well, I'd argue saying "this ain't quarterback evaluation" might truly make a better negative metaphorical comparison. At least with rocket science, it's science. You're working with things that have some level of consistency, even predictability. Stuff like chemistry, physics, metallurgy, etc. Human beings?  Specifically young male athletes with massive amounts of ego and testosterone who've been heavily catered to a lot of their lives and have now been handed large sums money and a portal to fame... Yeah, good luck with thatb😖 Heck, you might get better odds buying a Powerball ticket, or perhaps playing a roulette wheel at a Vegas casino. (gambling involves risk; please play responsibility. for help with gambling addiction call the Gambling Hotline at 1-800-522-4700)
    • The sad part is Williams led the league in rushing tds as well with like 18 and didn't even make the pro bowl that season.  Too bad it all ended in Jake's epic collapse 
    • Yeah. He talked about using him that way and I forget the term. Maybe nickel LB? Ike have to watch it again.    If you look at the video it is maybe 2/3 through where talks about him and also CSW.     
×
×
  • Create New...