Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gano not just to IR, he is not eligible to return this year


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, cptx said:

They can trade the Panthers for him but that's about it, I believe.

Unless there has been a rule change, you can't trader a player who is on IR. All we could do is negotiate an injury settlement and cut him.

 

Corrrection,. Rule did change last year. We can trade him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Sasquatch said:

Unless there has been a rule change, you can't trader a player who is on IR. All we could do is negotiate an injury settlement and cut him.

Corrrection,. Rule did change last year. We can trade him. 

Yeah, you can.

You just have to find somebody who's dumb enough to trade for an injured player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad we aren't in the situation of the Vikings. They traded a 5th round pick for a kicker and cut him like 2 or 3 weeks afterwards. I didn't get to see why but damn did he just straight up suck for them to just throw away a 5th round pick like that o what lol. Gonna have to look into how he did for some clarification or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ichigo1057 said:

I'm glad we aren't in the situation of the Vikings. They traded a 5th round pick for a kicker and cut him like 2 or 3 weeks afterwards. I didn't get to see why but damn did he just straight up suck for them to just throw away a 5th round pick like that lol.

I just heard that news on NFL radio. Vikes did all that for nothing and now they will have kicker problems. They will just have to get a kicker from what is left on the market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

I just heard that news on NFL radio. Vikes did all that for nothing and now they will have kicker problems. They will just have to get a kicker from what is left on the market.

Here is their explanation for it. They basically claimed he struggled in preseason and that when he came in it made Dan Bailey start doing better. Heck they brought him in to try and do both K and P jobs and then he leaves with neither. So they really gave a 5th round pick so they can put temporary pressure on their current kicker to do better. I somehow feel like that won't last into the season now that he doesn't have that person behind him anymore lol.

https://www.vikings.com/video/pelissero-explains-why-vikings-moved-on-from-vedvik-sloter-and-treadwell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, ichigo1057 said:

Here is their explanation for it. They basically claimed he struggled in preseason and that when he came in it made Dan Bailey start doing better. Heck they brought him in to try and do both K and P jobs and then he leaves with neither. So they really gave a 5th round pick so they can put temporary pressure on their current kicker to do better. I somehow feel like that won't last into the season now that he doesn't have that person behind him anymore lol.

https://www.vikings.com/video/pelissero-explains-why-vikings-moved-on-from-vedvik-sloter-and-treadwell

In other words....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's handing off play calling duties to fuging Brad Idzik as well so, either that mouth breather can run the playbook and Canales can grow as an all around head coach or it will be a horrible decision and both of them and BY can screw off. I'm fine with that as long as it isn't just another excuse for BY to get another year with another coach worthy of working around his limitations as a qb. 
    • Not only for Andersen but the whole team, having not beat the Habs this season before tonite.  Shows them that they aren't jinxed.
    • I understand why people say things like it could be worse in relation to Tepper but it just doesn't jive for me. Are the optics bad? Yes. Would I want her to be the owner of my team? No. But I mean she's only been owner for a year and the Colts overall are a better run organization. As far as I know they've also never had the distinction of having the worst win percentage in all of professional sports either. Tepper has owned this team for 8 years and about the only thing that has been consistent has been the ability to continue to find different ways to achieve new lows. Even now people are saying things are different yada yada but we said these same things at certain points under Rhule Fitterer and Reich. I'm going to wait to see how the rubber meets the road this upcoming season before I make any strong conclusions about anything in relation to the longevity under this franchise going forward.
×
×
  • Create New...