Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bears vs Packers


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

 

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Even if he didn't look his best tonight, I'd hate to face Aaron Rodgers twice a year. It's depressing. You think you've got him and then he just pulls something out of thin air.

If I were a defensive coordinator in his division I'd be chowing down antidepressants like candy.

Well yeah, I hate facing Brees 2x's a year.  Pretty similar situation.

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This is one of those rare games where both fanbases are probably on suicide watch after that game. Maybe the Packers' weather it a bit better since their D looked great and surely their offense can't be THAT godawful with a future HOFer at QB.

Rodgers is not the same.  That offense is anemic.

The Bears were gonna come back to Earth a little.  They'll end up the better team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I wasn't referring to you specifically.  You said Ditka would be a popular choice.  He would be popular because he is known by most of todays fans.  Luckman not so much.  

Fair enough, though I doubt many of them would remember him as a player.

I'll cite Collinsworth again though: That 85 team was something special, most likely the second best team of all time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Final Note: Bad as this game might have been, I have full confidence that there will be even worse games played this weekend. Heck, the opening Monday nighters have been rancid cat sh-t for the last several years.

I just sincerely hope ours isn't one of them.

Even the greatest coach of all time runs into this. In 2017 (September), the patriots defense was atrocious in the back seven in coverage. It was a feel good win with a field goal at the end, but let’s be honest, most of the touchdowns Carolina scored that day were gifts. 

Wanting your team to win by 30 and things to be spotless on week one, and dealing with the reality that there’s a lot of rust a knock off. Those are two separate things

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With 11 minutes to play in the game, the Bears and Packers were combined 3 of 22 on third down. I know the narrative is going to be “this was a smash mouth game, great defense by both teams, a fitting throwback to the 100th year anniversary with Vince and George smiling down”. 

It wasn’t a smashmouth game. It was a sloppy game. Vince and George would be shitting bricks over it. 

That said, I’m pumped that football is back, because it sure as hell beats late-February.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ellis said:

Even the greatest coach of all time runs into this. In 2017 (September), the patriots defense was atrocious in the back seven in coverage. It was a feel good win with a field goal at the end, but let’s be honest, most of the touchdowns Carolina scored that day were gifts. 

Wanting your team to win by 30 and things to be spotless on week one, and dealing with the reality that there’s a lot of rust a knock off. Those are two separate things

It's gotten a lot worse since the new practice rules went in.

Hell, Week One of the 03-04 season had some amazing football games (ours obviously being one of the best).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ellis said:

With 11 minutes to play in the game, the Bears and Packers were combined 3 of 22 on third down. I know the narrative is going to be “this was a smash mouth game, great defense by both teams, a fitting throwback to the 100th year anniversary with Vince and George smiling down”. 

It wasn’t a smashmouth game. It was a sloppy game. Vince and George would be shitting bricks over it. 

That said, I’m pumped that football is back, because it sure as hell beats late-February.

Yeah, the defenses were great but it also has to be mentioned that the offenses were also straight trash. Plenty of great defense, but a lot of bad offense also combined to create this 7-3 final score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Whatever oddsmaker set the point total for this game at 47 needs to find a new line of work.

I used to live in Vegas so heard a lot from oddsmakers on local radio. They basically say the best time to make money is the first week or two in the regular season since they can only guess what teams will be like based on prior trends. Of course, they win it all back and then some once they have enough data.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right, so basically what I said in my first post about this last night. Tepper needs to use that big wallet of his in one of the few ways it can be used in the NFL given the cap.   Give Scourton a bigger signing bonus but not a fully guaranteed deal. Everyone wins in that scenario as if Scourton is smart and hires good money people, he'll take that bigger signing bonus and use it to make more money in the end over the next 4 years than if he just had his fully guaranteed deal and a smaller signing bonus.
    • It is all confusing and layered. SB is the cash you get very soon within weeks or in simple terms, its what you get to sign the paper work. Players and agents can agree on contract but what to "wait" to sign......teams don't like that cause you can "Carlos Boozer" yourself. In order to get that ink dry, while keeping the contract the same, portion it as a bonus to "sign" and get the funds with ________ .   * But Ive seen worded contracts that split the SB or a 20% to a later date. The beans counters can fill in the details about why certain dates are better and save the team money.. Theres tricks to the trade and accounting is full of them.    Ugh another big layer, is SB can be used to manipulate cap and players. Ill try to give a example that makes enough sense. Believe it or not having a owner like Tepper is a cheat code for this. He has cash in hand, where as Mark Davis had problem making pay roll and had to move the team to Vegas....... Tepper can give you 100,000,000 SB right now and the team can spread out the cap hit. Another owner doesn't have or want to give the player 100,000,000 in cash, but offered the same guaranteed contract in roster bonuses fully guaranteed over the next few years........ Which one do you want??? Everyone wants the money now, not before another inflation waves hits in 2 years. So it does 'pay" to have a owner like tepper that's able to have real cash on hand, while it also works GREAT for cap help. Heres a good video, if you can stand coked up pat and mask look-a-like AJ    
×
×
  • Create New...