Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

IR Trade rule?


Obeg

Recommended Posts

I believe you actually can now (there was a change sometime back) but the biggest rule governing that kind of trade is that you have to find somebody who's dumb enough to give something up for a guy who was injured badly enough to be designated "out for the year".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I’m so confused why people keep bringing up cut gano while he was on IR.... he isn’t getting paid his active game bonus, and it would result in 5.7mil of dead cap. 

I'm ignorant on all of the cans and cannots ... but my thought was we have what may be a healthy, good kicker on IR.  There are several desperate teams in need of a kicker.. Pats being one of these.  If we can trade off the IR OR use this fact to entice Gano to be generous in the injury settlement - we can get out from under some, if not all of what you mention.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Obeg said:

I'm ignorant on all of the cans and cannots ... but my thought was we have what may be a healthy, good kicker on IR.  There are several desperate teams in need of a kicker.. Pats being one of these.  If we can trade off the IR OR use this fact to entice Gano to be generous in the injury settlement - we can get out from under some, if not all of what you mention.

 

  Even if that was to happen, it would save only a couple 100K at best. The 5.6M isn’t going anywhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Makes no sense to cut Gano right now. He doesn’t count against the 53 man roster, and while on IR hits our cap for $3.7 mil. 

Of we cut him, he would instantly hit cap for $5.6 mil. We can’t injury settle/negotiate out of that $5.6m. It is money we have already paid him via signing bonus.

If we trade him, it would only make sense if the other team enticed us with good enough picks, which isn’t likely for a kicker. 

If Slye stays on his current trajectory, you cut or trade Gano after this season, and his dead cap number drops enough to where we would save about $1.5 mil by cutting him (cap number of $4.5 and dead money of $3 nets $1.5 savings).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...