Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

10+ NFL teams really interested in seeing if Cam Newton goes up for trade


Saca312

Recommended Posts

looks like many NFL teams are praying to the football Gods the Panthers start Kyle Allen full time and let Cam Newton go.

While this scenario is null at best as a possibility, seems that in the case it does happen, Cam will have a huge market.

Which is basically stating the obvious, but just an interesting thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 teams?  I don't see it.

MAYBE Tampa, Washington, Chicago, Denver, Tennessee, maybe.  And most of those would probably rather just draft a new QB since they aren't in contending windows, save Chicago.  

If you can get a 1st rounder, you do it and don't think twice.  Use the free cap space to load up for the years remaining on KA's rookie deal like Philadelphia, Seattle, and SF did this decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MVPccaffrey said:

10 teams?  I don't see it.

MAYBE Tampa, Washington, Chicago, Denver, Tennessee, maybe.  And most of those would probably rather just draft a new QB since they aren't in contending windows, save Chicago.  

If you can get a 1st rounder, you do it and don't think twice.  Use the free cap space to load up for the years remaining on KA's rookie deal like Philadelphia, Seattle, and SF did this decade.

Good luck riding that Kyle Allen train to mediocrity 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it played out that we traded Cam, I hope we trade him to the Titans for very personal reasons.

My brother lives in the Nashville area and is a huge Titans fan and a huge Cam hater. Oh man would that be sweet, lol.

Can you imagine that lady in Nashville who wrote that letter. I don't remember all the details of her outrage at the moment, but she would probably die on the spot. (I'm not advocating a trade, fwiw. Just considering a funny possibility.)

camtroll.0.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The difference is about how much player input is allowed and encouraged in the decision making process. Top down teams tend to dictate to players how everything is handled. Disagreements are handled by the coach and players are expected to do what they are told regardless of what they think or feel.  Players are perceived as commodities to be used until we find better. In player led teams player input is encouraged and valued. Players and especially leaders are expected to settle their own disagreements and be accountable to the team but mostly to each other. Players are family to be appreciated and supported in their growth. Is the reality of football the same in both? Yeah there are limited positions, football is a business and winning is the bottom line. Coaches get final say and run the program because that is their job. But in player led teams they feel valued, appreciated, part of a larger whole. Most people who have worked at multiple jobs know exactly what I am talking about. When players try to run the show and don't value  coach input that isn't a player led team, that is a circus which we surely are familiar with in our past.  
    • For our pics and trades tonight and tmrw.  Remember, Aho was a 2nd rounder and Slavin was a 4th rounder. 
    • Seems to be the consensus from the talking heads. I really wish we had double dipped at center in the 2nd round. Sion will never play in the league. 
×
×
  • Create New...