Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hindsight being 20/20


stankowalski

Should Cam have jumped on that fumble  

22 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Cam have jumped on that fumble

    • Yes
    • No
    • Only if it contained chicken wings


Recommended Posts

I got poo'd from a couple of people for stating that I believe that Cam should've jumped on that fumble in the Superbowl.  I also said the same thing back then.  Reasoning being that you never know when you're going to get back.  A lot of people back then were saying that no he shouldn't risk it because of the injury risk.  But I say if you're in the Super Bowl you do what it takes to win. 

BTW...Jake Delhomme would've jumped on that fumble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize that the situation in that game changed everything?  Short field they get another TD.

End game stats
First downs-Panthers 21, Broncos 10

Total yards-Panthers-315, Broncos 194

 

Defining stat (of which Cam was a big part of) Turnovers-Panthers 4, Broncos 2

 

Cam cost us that game.  I don't forgive poor Super Bowl performances.  We should have had our first Super Bowl in SB50. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll bite on this. That one play did not lose us that game. It was a collection of bad plays, bad/no calls, and poor game preparation that lost us that game. Watch the positioning of the two closest Denver players on that play though, had Cam dove in for the ball he would have gone head first into the first Denver player and had the second one coming in to possibly lay another collision on him, which could have resulted in in being injured and out of the game. 

All in all, we lost, poo happens, it was four years ago. Move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • fans view “box safety” with the same disdain they have when they hear “game manager” QB.   but there’s a reason most 1st round safeties are “box safeties”-it’s a much longer list of requisite skills to be a good box safety than it is to be a guy whose only real responsibility is to not get beat over the top. Fans crave the ed reed type and as someone who has never been able to enjoy this franchise having a guy like that, I get the enthusiasm-but I’m not really prepared to spend a first round pick on a free safety. If it happens it’ll be fun, it’ll address a need with a good player and that’s well and good. But those guys end up walking after their first contract because their pedigree usually outpaces what their teams feel like they’re adding to their overall win total.
    • Its criminal that the upcoming season is mainly in the tiny hands of BY.  I still member the time I did a full turn, if you member his first off-season from that Panthers all-time worst team....... Answering questions at his first presser, he goes along the lines " I didn't do nothing, no weight room or throwing" " I needed to get away". I was fully out with him, the guy didn't even try to improve his football mind, body, strength, in the biggest joke of panther football. I could not believe it, what a leader or dare say "point guard"(lols @ NBA point guards as a ref)
    • I view FS almost as the NT of the secondary. Oftentimes the true measure of his impact isn't necessarily in the plays that he makes but what he allows you to do with the rest of your defense to allow them to make plays. When you have that elite true sideline to sideline FS safety blanket over the top of the defense it allows you to be a lot more aggressive with everyone else. Where as when you have a Nick Scott as your last line of defense you gotta be mindful to not have to rely too heavily on that.
×
×
  • Create New...