Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kyle Allen is an inexperienced but good backup qb who is learning!


Matt62881

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, GreensboroPirate said:

Bro, PFF has Kyle Allen as the 2nd worst QB in the NFL

Maybe PFF isn't that great, but they're not THAT inaccurate

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-pff-rankings-nfl-quarterback-rankings-following-week-8-2019

 

30. Kyle Allen, Carolina Panthers

While Allen’s story as an unexpected success story was a fine one, his 106.6 passer rating and zero interceptions in his four starts was fool’s gold. It caught up to him last week against the 49ers, and his current numbers (88.5 passer rating) are more in line with his actual performance. He must improve his pocket presence, as his 22.5 fumble grade is worst in the league and he ranks just 31st in adjusted completion percentage (71.3%) despite showing impressive flashes at times during Carolina’s winning streak.

 

5-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER said:

so common that you’re doing it yourself? the obvious statistical outlier game was the arizona game. there’s your “shock event.” new starter, limited tape, extremely shitty defense. more touchdowns in that game than in the 4 games since. 4 yards per attempt higher than in the following 4 games.

of the 6 games he has started, he has posted >100 QBR and scored at least 2 TDs in 3 of them.  In those games he is still not a world beater in completion % - the AZ game is an outlier there.  And he still isn't hitting huge deep balls consistently (altho he had a few in those games).  In those games he seemed to get knocked on his ass less than the others but maybe that is perception...

then in 2 of the 3 he had not good performances but did make at least a play or two.

and then the SF game.  I would say SF is honestly the outlier, but his body of work is not "zomg amazing" even given that. 

"5-1" is great and all but doesn't tell the whole story in the least.  dude has been good, and bad... he has contributed, and cost us... 

personally I hope Cam gets back before we get a chance to see too much more of Allen, but I think we are still lucky to have him as a backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

of the 6 games he has started, he has posted >100 QBR and scored at least 2 TDs in 3 of them.  In those games he is still not a world beater in completion % - the AZ game is an outlier there.  And he still isn't hitting huge deep balls consistently (altho he had a few in those games).  In those games he seemed to get knocked on his ass less than the others but maybe that is perception...

then in 2 of the 3 he had not good performances but did make at least a play or two.

and then the SF game.  I would say SF is honestly the outlier, but his body of work is not "zomg amazing" even given that. 

"5-1" is great and all but doesn't tell the whole story in the last.  dude has been good, and bad... he has contributed, and cost us... 

personally I hope Cam gets back before we get a chance to see too much more of Allen, but I think we are still lucky to have him as a backup.

A reasonable assessment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GreensboroPirate said:

The Golden Calf of Bristol had a great record in Denver and won a playoff game

 

leave it to Panthers fans to consider 9-7 a "great record", haha...

edit: and fwiw I agree that record means little, but The Golden Calf of Bristol isn't a great example of how career w/l means nothing given his is not particularly good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Toomers said:

And he never played another snap at QB. Ever. So saying 5-1 like it has relevance is ridiculous. 

An incredibly amazing phenomena going on here....

....an undrafted Quarterback comes off the bench and takes over a team that is sucking hind tit and rallies them to 4 straight wins in the NFL....

....an all the "fans" want to do is figure out every possible way to denigrate the guy.

I've seen the concept kicked around here for a while --- these aren't Panthers fans --- these are "Cam fans". 

(Cam fans who appear to be incredibly afraid of something...)

I too am ready for Cam to come back --- what's the dang holdup?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fact of the matter is Cam might not come back 100% and I don’t think Allen isn’t the answer either.

Allen is 23 though and just starting out. That’s as good as an excuse as Cam’s injury. And for that he’s our solid back up.

really won’t know until January.

What this team really needs are new coaches, refresh the philosophy and let them figure out what they want at QB.

Ron’s time is done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No disrespect intended, but you act as if we are supposed to value your opinion when it is all emotion and no fact.  The roster (I assume you mean offense) is "still trash" because someone who just signed up for the Huddle has declared it to be so?   Buhahaha.  ha.  Let me show you how FACTS work, and why emotional, unsupported opinions don't carry much weight: TE: Upgraded through the draft.  Sanders is a weapon that should improve the passing game and give Bryce an outlet he did not have last year. RB:  We just drafted the best RB in college football, one who can protect the passer, run the ball, and catch the ball like nobody else on the roster.  His knee will be cleared July 1.  OL: We just signed two of the best guards in football.  that is what Payton did to protect Brees.  Ekwonu has the skill and talent, he was simply missing technique.  We got him a better OL coach.  Center?  Bozeman was ineffective last year.  Corbett is an established veteran OLman.  It seems we are much better up front. WR:  We added a guy who gets open and has averaged about 900 yards per game as a #2 in Pittsburgh with an inferior QB there.  Thielen was a 1000 yard WR last season.  We have not had a #2 like XL, with his YAC capabilities and ability to catch contested passes.  In other words, the X is much better; the Z will be replaced with a stud WR, and the veteran slot will probably not be the #1 WR in 2024--he should be the #2 or even #3 most effective WR.  The 2023 Z WR, who had 418 yards and was showing signs of improving, will not be a starter in 2024.   As much as the OL has improved, we improved the weapons.  QB:  All of these additions increase levels of protection for the QB that he did not have last year and they give him more powerful weapons that he did not have last year.  Young will not be a rookie getting hammered trying to throw to people who are not separating.  This should make him improved.  How much? remains to be seen. Now keep in mind that we did this by not reworking contracts and kicking the can down the road.  We did not have a first rounder in the draft.  We added a second rounder to next year's draft.  We also addressed needs on defense as well, adding established DL, OLBs, ILBs, and DBs.  We get 2 first round pick starters who were injured most of the season back on that defense.  Yes, we lost Burns, Luvu, and a few others, but while being good players, they were either asking for too much money or they were not great fits for the system.  So the D should be better as well. That is not trash.   
    • Last year he had Bryce and was in the dog house.  The year before we ran it 90% of the time and we had trash at QB, DJ only had 888 yards that season. We had trash QB and trash coaching his whole time here, hard to judge any wr during his time here
    • We essentially dropped 7 spots and got a future 2nd after the dust settled. Not bad at all.
×
×
  • Create New...