Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The NFL moving this game to 4:25 is more evidence they want Brees in the SB


PanthersNC1984

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, uncfan888 said:

Another quality PU thread 

Man this made me laugh, is it really though seems like it.

55 minutes ago, Mage said:

Despite how everyone acts like the world is falling, we are 5-3.  This is a very important game, hence why it was moved.

Literally the first thing I was thinking we are a team with that literally should be 6-2 maybe 7-1 they see it also. We’re good to go we had one bad loss outside our that we’ve beaten all our opponents with Kyle. CMC is having all pro MVP season so far who doesn’t want to see that. We lead the league in sacks and interceptions (2nd I think) who doesn’t want to see that vs one of the best throwers in the league. Luke the best middle LB in the game playing chess with ARod maybe I’m crazy but this is worthy of prime time but we dropped the ball last year so no networks wanted a 7 game losing streak team on any prime time games.

Things change quick I’m the nfl we're a 5-3 contender this game should have the intensity of a playoff game imo we win this we start putting ourselves in WC contention and they need a win coming off a loss excellent game to move to primetime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL

 

Here's how that NFL meeting went.

 

Guys we want Brees to win the superbowl this year no matter what, but our main concern is that the Ron Rivera coached Carolina Panthers led by Kyle Allen are going to prevent that.  Well  guys we must do something.  What can we do?  I know, let's move the Panthers Packers game to 4:25......  That will stop that football juggernaut and get Brees to where we want him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. I didn’t think it was good either but the QB sure did. He was the defacto number one target, not Chark, was my point.
    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
×
×
  • Create New...