Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

who was kyle looking for while wright came wide open for a touchdown? (content included)


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

It’s not that hard to pull up 2017 wildcard panthers V saints.

You’re the one who keeps bringing it up, so the onus is on you. But, I just went and looked at it and it’s not even comparable. Cam had a blitzer on him as soon as he hiked the ball. That play was doomed from the start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AggieLean said:

You’re the one who keeps bringing it up, so the onus is on you. But, I just went and looked at it and it’s not even comparable. Cam had a blitzer on him as soon as he hiked the ball. That play was doomed from the start.

I see you are still not connecting the dots. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

It’s not that hard to pull up 2017 wildcard panthers V saints.

You do realize the guy you're trying to criticize in this comparison is literally the only reason we were in that position in the postseason, right? The man was the Panthers leading rusher. Let that sink in. Maybe his absence is why we are so abysmal at winning games at the end with the end zone in front of us?

Maybe you need to connect some dots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, onmyown said:

Allen did look to the right and saw the open man but was situated to make a throw to his left and saw the unblocked defender/Dlineman to the his right and didn’t chance it/ was too late slow reading it.

He didn’t make a read all day. He ran a zero-read offense where he either looked for a defensive lineman to sack him or he closed his eyes and threw the ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've shown you numerous comps for other tackles in the same age and talent range.  His contract, taking into account his age, health, etc.  is the going rate.  It's a fair deal. I've shown you examples of how long it usually takes to find even an average replacement.  Hell, look at every tackle that has ever started for the Panthers.  How many would you consider a success?  They are not easy to find. After everything we've done with this team since drafting Bryce why would we decide to let our best linemen go and add a huge question mark at tackle?   FA is a crapshoot in which any guy available will have cons/issues.  If not, they'll cost a fortune.   Outside of a first or maybe 2nd round pic next year it'll take a few years for a tackle to learn the position at the NFL level.  There are still questions about Icky. Every vet NFL player deals with maintenance.  Between the contract value and history I'm not overly worried about his knee.  I contend his knee issue isn't anything to be overly worried about.  It's not zero risk but it's an acceptable risk.  Every player we draft and every contract we sign has risk.  You're blowing up his own negative words about his knees and ignoring him saying he is healthy and the knee is a non issue.  You have a strong chicken little complex with this team.  Being he has always been a Panther they are very aware of any health issues. We paid now because now is cheaper.  If his knee was really an issue they would have waited.  That tells me it's not the issue you want it to be.    
    • Sauls getting cut by Steelers if no trade happens.
    • No they are going to give Claudin Cherelus 2 spots. 
×
×
  • Create New...