Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Odds to replace Rivera

Forty-Eight

By Forty-Eight,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Forty-Eight Newbie

Forty-Eight

Posted
  • Author
Posted
8 minutes ago, Malt Liquor said:

Jason Garett at #2 on that shitty list? There is nothing is about Jason Garrett that says champion in football. This has to be a   f u c k i n g   joke.

Just like Rivera but both of them will likely be two of the hottest names on the market

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Moo Daeng Experienced

Moo Daeng

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, rayzor said:

The fact that they have Garrett and Quinn in the top 5 shows that it's a bunch of morons in on this. No reason to take any part of this list seriously.

Should be totally discarded.

It's for betting purposes if that wasn't obvious. It has one single purpose. Get money to be placed in a distributed way such that the house profits. The methods for doing so would not have anything to do with logical predictions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Chad Reuter of NFL.com 4-round mock draft

      By TD alt · Posted

      Also, you don't really get good value by drafting a center in the first.
    • TD alt
      Chad Reuter of NFL.com 4-round mock draft

      By TD alt · Posted

      First off, we haven't been ignoring the defense. We have drafted several defensive players, but, perhaps more importantly, we have added good pieces in free agency. Secondly, the offense was still kinda bad (27th or so depending where you look at). You can't just say we can't pick an offensive guy while acknowledging that the offense wasn't good. Everything is on the table. Like I said above, it seems kind of counterproductive to say that we shouldn't draft an offensive player high unless they're at certain positions. The offense was mediocre at best. Sure, we had an uncanny knack to win some close games at opportune times, but the offense wasn't really good. To me, it makes little sense to put limitations on who/what we should draft when we need an upgrade at so many positions. What you look at is trying to get the best value--bang for your buck so to speak--and that's the way it should be. D-Mo has used FA to set up the draft in order not to be pigeonholed into anything, and that's the way that it should be.
    • LinvilleGorge
      College Basketball 2025

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Hubert has plenty of money. I don't hate the guy. I think he a legit good guy. This is Ron Rivera all over again for me. It's just very obvious a coaching change is needed and it audka we gottaboart ways with a good guy and I'd much rather it work out but the same issues appearing again and again year after year are clearly shouting what needs to happen. With that said, if we hire Todd Golden, that's it. I'm out. I'd greatly prefer to just keep getting disappointed by Hubert. I can at least stand to root for that.
×
×
  • Create New...