Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tua returning?


Panthercougar68

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Look, we wouldn't get Tua anyhow.  Either the Dolphins or Chargers would sang him first.  Honesly, I think he's damaged goods.  He'd be a younger version of Cam and without an improved OL to protect him either.

That’s the issue. That leaves the Chargers or Miami taking a non QB position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

I have heard rumblings that he might but I think this hurts the Panthers because it’s 1 less qb taken before 7.

Thoughts?

Why would we want to take Tua anyway? His is injury prone at Alabama with less arm strength, mobility, and expeirence than the QB we already have. 

Suck in 2020 for Fields or Lawrence. Point. Blank. Period. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

That would also mean one of those two teams would likely take Herbert so Hurney wouldn't get any bright ideas.  I think he's VERY overrated.

I like Herbert and believe that with a Head Coach/QB Coach like Mike McCarthy he would be similar to Lawrence at this level. Hell, put Herbert at Clemson and Lawrence at Oregon and you'd probably have the same results as the teams already had. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

I like Herbert and believe that with a Head Coach/QB Coach like Mike McCarthy he would be similar to Lawrence at this level. Hell, put Herbert at Clemson and Lawrence at Oregon and you'd probably have the same results as the teams already had. 

Don't let a Tigers fan see this blasphemy!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FYI (I don't think you are too far off base)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
×
×
  • Create New...