Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule is not into analytics, and his offensive philosophy is archaic and inefficient

bobowilson

By bobowilson,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

bobowilson Newbie

bobowilson

Posted
Posted

There seems to be a perception Rhule is an analytics guy, but this couldn't be further from the truth.  He's actually pretty similar to Rivera, in that he's conservative, obsessed with running the ball, and playing for 'field position'.

Anyone who watched their Bowl game last week will remember he punted on 4th and 1 at midfield when he was down by 2 touchdowns.  There's a lot more to analytics than 4th down decisions, but these kind of conservative decisions demonstrate a lack of awareness.  And in fact, he punts on 4th down quite a bit (and even when you hear him discuss his decison making, it's always best on some gut feeling he had, rather than numbers).

He could still be a successful coach.   Perhaps he'a adaptable and will embrace analytics if someone teaches him.  But he's going to need coordinators who are lot brighter and more innovative than he is, as his main selling point seems to be his leadership abilities and not anything tactical.  

There has to be something Tepper heard from Rhule that we're not aware of, but as of now, it's a mystery.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted

Isn't this why he wants a Sports Science department funded? To embrace the analytics? For the record, that has been his history at Temple and Baylor. Get a lead and then run the ball to death to kill clock and lean on the defense. Its why year in and year out his defenses were highly ranked and his offenses were often bottom half of the NCAA. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
Just now, Tbe said:

Six of the top seven running teams made the playoffs this year.

That is in terms of yards. If you look at his running backs in college, 6 of the 7 years he didn't have a 1k yard rusher. In 4 of those seasons his leading rushing attempt guy was a QB. A QB who might not play football again due to concussions from running and getting hammered. In like 4 of those seasons the top rusher on his team didn't even make it to 700 yards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
zacka77ack Rising Star

zacka77ack

Posted
Posted

You morons are hunting for something that is not actually what Tepper said. Tepper said he wants OLD SCHOOL FOOTBALL DISCIPLINE. Those of you confused why we hired Rhule, who doesn't appear to be the next Wiz Kid coach, because you think Tepper has been preaching nothing but "Analytics" need to work on your comprehension skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stan786 Mentor

stan786

Posted
Posted

Guy definitely has old school tendencies but it’s pretty clear he’s willing to work with whatever he’s got to win. While he may “hate” the RPO he built a staff at Baylor adept at running it and built the program off it.

Also, Baylor has been pretty ahead of the curve in a lot of analytics based concepts spear headed by Rhule.

As an example


Yeah it’ll be interesting to see how this plays out but Tepper was pretty clear what he wanted: a coach that liked old school discipline but embraced new school thinking. This feels like the definition of that hire. Half of analytics is the willingness to use it and it’s pretty clear he has that. Can’t say he’s gonna be good but I’d definitely say this Posts Title is a bit of an exaggeration.

 

I do agree he reminds me of the version of Rivera Tepper wanted him to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      QBs that would cost next to nothing and are better than anything we currently have.

      By strato · Posted

      I am no football savant as has been demonstrated here over and over, but I saw it.  I went for years doing the mock draft thing and researching the players that we might get around our pick, time consuming stuff. And we would get to the draft and trade the pick. All that time, wasted.  So I quit doing that. Also realized I was not a scout and would never be a scout and went to looking the videos and reports After  we picked a guy.  Maybe I would look at the 1st round, but quit that too and just looked after we picked.    When they did that trade I saw Bryce and his size and just ruled him out. Then it got to yeah they are probably going to take him, I relented and looked at some video and got to his pro day. It took me all of a few minutes to see the issues. The footwork. The arm. And the tape of games? The backyard style. I knew, what can I say?  (Also, went down the physical checklist, not a single plus attribute on the NFL level. Arm, speed, size, etc, nothing to offset the negatives. nothing)  I think it was easy for me because I had not watched a single game he played in college,and wasn’t drawn in by the hype. Had no preconceived notions and just looked at it pretty clinically.  I got in here and everyone was going “but look at what he did in college! It is the SEC, if he can do it in the SEC he can do it in the NFL!” Couldn’t reason with hardly anyone.  I don’t think I could tell you which guy would succeed between two prototypical guys with great arms and athleticism, and have no special insight into any of that. My one calling in football scouting was to see the real about what we were about to do. And you still don’t know for sure until they get in a real game in the NFL. 
    • kungfoodude
      Bills predictions

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      Miss Bryce sorely is possibly the most hilarious statement I have read on the Huddle in quite some time.
    • kungfoodude
      QBs that would cost next to nothing and are better than anything we currently have.

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      He did only throw 1 pass 20+ in that game. I think he is still struggling to adjust to the NFL. At Alabama he was able to extend plays and play backyard football. That's not only not the style of offense we have been running but his physical skills don't lend themselves to that style of play at this level.  So, the amount of issues he actually has to clean up are WAAAAAY more than I anticipated as a guy that had Bryce #1 on my board in that draft class.  I am just not seeing a reasonable path for him to clean it all up and develop in a reasonable timeframe 
×
×
  • Create New...