Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kobe Bryant dead in Helicopter crash


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, uncfan888 said:

Planes maybe. Helicopters are dangerous. 

Even with planes, the big ones are super safe, overengineered to heck by the sort of people who put men in space and build spy planes that can take pictures of the ground while flying mach 17 at 40k feet. Small planes not so much, they crash too, probably owing as much to gap in operator experience as engineering. But yeah, you would be hard pressed to get me on a helicopter without some highly pressing need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Even with planes, the big ones are super safe, overengineered to heck by the sort of people who put men in space and build spy planes that can take pictures of the ground while flying mach 17 at 40k feet. Small planes not so much, they crash too, probably owing as much to gap in operator experience as engineering. But yeah, you would be hard pressed to get me on a helicopter without some highly pressing need.

Yeah, it seems like all you hear is small planes and helicopters crashing. No thanks 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

Yeah, it seems like all you hear is small planes and helicopters crashing. No thanks 

And over half of all air related crashes are pilot error. 
 

1. taking off over max weight

2. taking off in weather not suited for flying for that particular aircraft

3. flying outside ones experience.

4. Not checking or keeping up with mechanical issues.

remember in the aviation world the PIC or pilot in command is the sole person responsible for The aircraft. He makes the go or no go decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, billionairemonk said:

physics be damned

the SR-71 was Mach 3+ at 80,000 ft

i understand that you were most likely using hyperbole to make a point, but in case you weren't I had to post because the facts are still very impressive.  enjoy your day good sir.

yeah on top of being a big hyperbole offender, I have only a passing notion that commercial planes fly at about 30k and the blackbird would have flown a lot higher, should have made it 200k ft. just to be clear.

Although at least it wasn't going at R-17.

http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/tomsnyder/hg-1-34.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...