Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Proposed CBA approved by owners


panther4life

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, bull123 said:

this is a good deal...of course the players will say no

they want LESS games and more cash

owners should push for reduction in guaranteed contracts

players should push for big increase in salary cap & expanded rosters

and get rid of the Thursday game...just injuries waiting to happen

if players balk, replace them

Replacement players is about the NFL's worst nightmare. It would send advertisers fleeing and TV partners suing the league or attempting to break the TV deals. You found the one thing the NFL is petrified of, replacement players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not that simple.

There are some genuinely bad provisions in this agreement, the 17th game being one of them.

What really strikes me funny though is that the 17th game was already unpopular among players and then the owners throw in something like this?

Slick move :eyeroll:

Just a negotiating tactic.  Always ask for more than you really won't.  Throw in something that will be outlandish and use to as a bargaining chip for what you really want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NFLPA Executive Committee votes 6-5 against recommending CBA proposal to membership
 

Quote

That’s just a recommendation and the 32 player reps are also expected to hold a vote Friday. That will also serve as a recommendation as the NFLPA will submit the proposal to the full membership whether or not the player reps vote in favor of the deal.

If more than 50 percent of the membership votes for the proposal, the deal will be approved.

FYI: Our rep is Greg Van Roten.

Florio pointed out that the proposal isn't typically sent for a vote to the rank and file unless the Executive Committee recommends it, but Player Association leadership is sending this one to the members anyway.

It's starting to sound like some of the Players Association brass want this agreement even though the members seem largely against it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...