Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Comments from prospects about Panthers


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Apologies if this has already circulated.  I find the Kinlaw quote very interesting, and I found the Herbert response, considering the Cam situation, to be equally if not more interesting.  It seems as though the Panthers might have asked him to keep it quiet---speculation on my part, but I have never heard of the meeting being kept "private." Perhaps Herbert wants it kept private for some reason.  However, he does not deny--and if he had not and wanted his visits quiet, might he have just dispelled the rumor at that time?  Kinlaw's response is the exact opposite of private (It could be a case of hoping your favorite, hometown team picks you and using the press to let the team know that you are interested in them more than the team is interested in you, but the Herbert quote is a bit odd. And what does he mean by, "They have some free agency guys...?"  https://nfltraderumors.co/2020-nfl-draft-prospect-visit-tracker/

I will note that I searched other sites and cannot find any evidence of any team having talked to Herbert, except one interview with King:

FMIA: Who’d you meet at the combine who was impressive, or who you really wanted to meet?

Herbert: “Coach McDaniels with the Patriots. [Offensive coordinator Josh McDaniels.] That’s a guy I’ve always watched, always looked up to. I love their offense.”

So imagine The Pats do like Herbert.  They pick at #23.  The Panthers at #7 might be willing to trade back if NE wants to get their guy.  If Love has indeed "leapfrogged" Herbert as CBS states in their talent evaluations after the combine, then it stands to reason that the Panthers could be sitting on a hot position.  For example, if the top 4 QBs are Burrow, Tua, Love, and then Herbert, and the Chargers pick Love, for example, the last of the first round QBs is sitting there at #7.  Indy, Tampa Bay are in play,  but if the Pats really want Herbert and he is the man left standing, it could relate to a boatload of picks. 

image.png.b64614719044e699e793459fd9227dcf.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Either we keep Cam and go DT with the first round pick, or we move on from Cam and get the QB of the future. There really isn't a middle ground.

I agree. Keeping Cam gives us an out, but if the QB is there, we could pull the trigger now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Either we keep Cam and go DT with the first round pick, or we move on from Cam and get the QB of the future. There really isn't a middle ground.

Or, we move Cam, draft an OT at 7, IOL in the 2nd or a WR, start Grier, and go get our QB next year?

Maybe trade back a bit in the 1st to pick up an extra 2nd next season to use to move up if we happen to win more than 3 games?

We really have no idea what this coaching staff/front office will do...uncharted waters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, nationsford said:

Herbert keeping panthers meeting a secret is interesting. Didn't he ball out at the combine?

He was solid, but word on the street is that Love passed him on some websites (CBS, is one, I think--not sure about ESPN).  Personally, I did not like Herbert at first, but the SR Bowl and his workout changed my mind.  Check out his combine numbers that were not related to throwing---he is an athlete-perfect size--and could flourish here.  I would say he is a better athlete than Burrow--and you see what Brady did there.

It is a bit interesting that he provided that answer but talked openly about meeting Josh McDaniels. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SOJA said:

If we trade back with the colts and nab Kinlaw at 13 I will be a very happy man 

That could happen. However, if we trade back with the Colts, it means there is a QB on the board worth taking at #7---at least to the Colts.  If we are looking to move Cam, how would anyone in the war room justify leaving a QB there to move back for a DT?  

That reminds me of me---when I wanted Marcel Dareus over Cam Newton because I thought Clausen just needed some weapons and protection in year 2.  I was wrong and glad to admit it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...