Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bradberry


Recommended Posts

No. This trade saves us a little over $7M over two years. Trading Turner for a pick or releasing him would have saved $20M. This wasn’t done to clear cap for any big deals. It’s a little better over two years but for this year it’s actually worse by a lot. It’s 2021 where we save by not having Turner. If Okung plays well great, but it doesn’t seem like it will help Little develop at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

No. This trade saves us a little over $7M. Trading Turner for a pick or releasing him saved $20M. This wasn’t done to clear cap for any big deals. It’s a little better but for this year it’s actually worse by a lot. It’s 2021 where we save by not having Turner. If Okung plays well great, but it doesn’t seem like it will help Little develop at all. 

Wouldn't that help us pay players long term though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jared Patterson said:

Wouldn't that help us pay players long term though?

If that was the goal then wouldn’t $13M more be better than a one year rental of a guy who missed 10 games last year? Did we learn nothing from spending $15M on Paradis and Williams last year? I just don’t buy the cap savings and that’s why I have no clue what our objectives are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, stbugs said:

No. This trade saves us a little over $7M over two years. Trading Turner for a pick or releasing him would have saved $20M. This wasn’t done to clear cap for any big deals. It’s a little better over two years but for this year it’s actually worse by a lot. It’s 2021 where we save by not having Turner. If Okung plays well great, but it doesn’t seem like it will help Little develop at all. 

Thats an odd way to look at it.  It saves 11 mil next year not 7 over 2 years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jfra78 said:

Thats an odd way to look at it.  It saves 11 mil next year not 7 over 2 years.  

You missed factoring in Turners salary.  It is not a salary dump if you take on 13 million. Panthers are trying their best to confuse the league and its fans. The panthers are trying hard to win and lose at the same time.  

Except all the "trust the process ones"/ your dumb lolz ones. Blind homers

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Basbear said:

You missed factoring in Turners salary.  It is not a salary dump if you take on 13 million. Panthers are trying their best to confuse the league and its fans. The panthers are trying hard to win and lose at the same time.  

Except all the "trust the process ones"/ your dumb lolz ones. Blind homers

 

It is a salary dump for nect season, but not this.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

It is a salary dump for nect season, but not this.  

somewhat, but we added 3 million more this year. stbug had it right save 20 million(roughly), but added 13. If it was a effort to gain cap, just cut Turner and avoid taking on Okung at 13 million for this season.

There no guarantee Okung can play, lungs with blood clots is VERY life or death serious. Family member got that, nearly died. Had to be on oxygen 24/7 and lost 1/2 his strength. Its no joke, kills nearly 100k usa each year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jfra78 said:

It is a salary dump for nect season, but not this.  

Right so if we pay $3M more this year and save $10.5M next year the. We save $7.5M total over the next two years. The salary cap rolls over so whatever we don’t use this year rolls over to 2021. You don’t think about one year versus the next. The extra $3M we use this year doesn’t get rolled over like it would have if we didn’t make the trade.

If you wanted a salary dump for next year then you trade Turner for a pick. If you do that you carry over $10M you save this year and you get $20.5M next year, way more than $7.5M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stbugs said:

No. This trade saves us a little over $7M over two years. Trading Turner for a pick or releasing him would have saved $20M. This wasn’t done to clear cap for any big deals. It’s a little better over two years but for this year it’s actually worse by a lot. It’s 2021 where we save by not having Turner. If Okung plays well great, but it doesn’t seem like it will help Little develop at all. 

From your explanation above, it sounds to me that they're neither "total rebuilding" nor "win now".

Sounds like they're trying to split the baby.

Now THAT'S a tried and true formula for success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, tiger7_88 said:

From your explanation above, it sounds to me that they're neither "total rebuilding" nor "win now".

Sounds like they're trying to split the baby.

Now THAT'S a tried and true formula for success.

No way Herniay can rebuild/tank AND go to the playoff in the same season....right?!?!?

 

 

Herniay- watch me 1990s GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To answer your question, I don't think our not extending Bradberry is because we don't think we can afford it. I think we could then and we still can now after the trade. It seems the Panthers have decided that the $15 million per year that Bradberry wants is more than we think he's worth. If he's willing to come down from that price or that market never develops for him, I don't think we would/should close the door on resigning him. I suspect though with too many teams flush with cap space and the lack of premier free agent cb options, someone will probably give him the contract he wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • THE WALKER BACKGROUND Here is where this gets weird.  Walker is a serviceable LT who could benefit from Gilbert's experience and coaching.  However, he is known for below-average run blocking and frequent penalties.  As you know, a penalty from a LT is a drive killer. A former 7th round pick, Walker has outperformed expectations, but he still ranks around the middle of the pack when compared to other tackles.  Having said that, it seems as if the Panthers are banking on Walker for a year and will then make a decision on Ickey.  In Green Bay, Walker was the starter, but the Packers weren't exactly sold on him. While most people think the oft-injured David Bakhtiari retired in 2023, he really wanted to keep playing.  He was released on March, 11, 2024.  Walker stepped in and took the reserve LT job from Nijman in that 2023 season, but they were close--probably because Nijman was more of a swing OT.  However, Nijman was a free agent in 2024, so the Panthers signed him just a week after Bakhtiari was released, leaving the Packers only Walker to play LT.  A month later, the Packers drafted a LT in the first round, Jordan Morgan out of Arizona.  Most Packer fans believe that Morgan would have beat out Walker for the LT job in 2024, but he had some shoulder injuries and went to IR after 6 games. In 2025, when the Packers had an injury at G during the season, instead of putting Morgan in at LT for Walker as planned, they played Morgan to guard because Walker can only play 1 position.  The Packers currently project Morgan back to LT for 2026, which is probably why they did not seek to retain Walker, at least in part. Based on this history, it is safe to say this: Walker is better than Nijman. We have the benefit of them being on the same team in a direct competition to help us see that. Walker is probably closer to Ickey, except for the penalties.  That bothers me a lot.  Bryce sucks when we get behind the sticks, and a run-first offense with a poor run-blocking LT is not ideal.   Regardless, I think Ickey and the Panthers find themselves in limbo right now, so the Walker deal comes at a perfect time for the GM.  Gilbert, perhaps, can work on the penalties and maybe a TE like Tremble can help offset the run blocking issues, so maybe we can actually stay the course at OT.  Maybe we do not draft a LT--maybe we draft a RT to groom behind Moton.  Maybe we draft a C.  At LT, the Panthers do not want to overreact, especially if Ickey returns to form or Walker demonstrates improvement.  Depth is certainly a concern, but a solid RT can be that depth.   I doubt the Panthers draft a LT in rounds one or maybe two.  It seems we have bigger needs at Will LB, DT, TE, and maybe S.  
    • THIS! IF we go offense at 19, it should be the trenches, which is no longer a pressing need with Waler's signing. 3 biggest needs in 2026, IMO, are DT, FS, ILB. We need to upgrade our starters at those positions and I expect anyone rafted at 19 to start immediately. I could rationalize OT (right or left) or CB since we're an injury away from a severe drop off AND have huge offseason concerns at both next year. Unless Bryce plays a lot better, I want to upgrade QB next year so I could get behind locking in a 2027 starter this year if the right guy is there. You COULD argue NCB and TE are positions where we need to upgrade our starters, sure, but not at 19. Both positions can still be upgraded on day 2.
    • He's firmly a second rounder and I don't think we would go that high for a TE this draft.  Third?  Possibly. I mean Rhule drafted Tremble in the third round who clearly was just a blocking TE.  
×
×
  • Create New...