Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, stirs said:

testing numbers supposedly

once their numbers started up like other countries, they were placed on the list.

of course, politics and what they tell you have a lot to do trying to save face, so you never know.

reporters asked about rate going up now and gov said, yep, that's why they are going on the ban list too.

never know however

No you dont.  Sounds like a "save face" move because they were hammered for this exclusion---inconsistent.  He has attempted to ban nations and nationalities that pose a much lesser threat to this nation.  The numbers were there- similar to ours-they had no argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

No you dont.  Sounds like a "save face" move because they were hammered for this exclusion---inconsistent.  He has attempted to ban nations and nationalities that pose a much lesser threat to this nation.  The numbers were there- similar to ours-they had no argument.

supposedly, the big jump 3 days ago triggered the move.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51839106

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i hope i'm not coming across as a fear monger.  i don't personally feel afraid.   its just kinda like when someone you love has cancer - one week good news, next week bad news - over time you learn not to get too up with the good news or down with the bad news and realize you're just gonna have to watch it play out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, raz said:

The irony is--this effects the top 1% (probability) more that the bottom 99%.  At least in terms of contamination.  Treatment advantages probably go to the rich guys.  Jet setters, world travelers, hosting large, international events....odds are more likely.  I am just glad they don't have a coronacomputervirus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, raz said:

i hope i'm not coming across as a fear monger.  i don't personally feel afraid.   its just kinda like when someone you love has cancer - one week good news, next week bad news - over time you learn not to get too up with the good news or down with the bad news and realize you're just gonna have to watch it play out.

I do not think so---who is to say what is rational or irrational right now?  One minute, I feel as if I am overreacting, the next minute, I am worried that I do not have enough hand sanitizer.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, raz said:

If we only have 15000 deaths I would consider it a raging success at containment. I fear it’s going to be 40-80 times that much or possibly more. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

I do not think so---who is to say what is rational or irrational right now?  One minute, I feel as if I am overreacting, the next minute, I am worried that I do not have enough hand sanitizer.

One doctor said, "everything we do before a pandemic will seem alarmist, everything we do after will seem inadequate"

Pretty much spot on

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

If we only have 15000 deaths I would consider it a raging success at containment. I fear it’s going to be 40-80 times that much or possibly more. 

15k would be less than normal flu, in which we have vaccinations, so I guess so.  Hoping much less, hoping

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, stirs said:

I have told my parents that church is off limits now, same with restaurants, etc.

Watching them struggle as you described earlier would be hard to handle

Good advice.  As a school administrator in Charlotte, we had to lock down the school like four times in about a six week period because gunmen had robbed this bank near our campus. Apparently the bank got the rep of having lax security--so every thug in a 500-mile radius started trying to rob it.  It got so bad, the police replaced the security guard with a real cop.  At any rate, the lockdown interrupts instruction and terrifies parents and children. 

After the fourth lockdown, I was visited by what we called the CMS "pacing police" who were concerned that we were a week behind Ballyentine (sp?) schools, where they had just visited.  We were on the East side.  I explained the lockdowns, etc. and they refused to accept it as a legitimate excuse.  I asked them if they had ever been through one.  They said they had "done the drills."  I asked them to leave campus and come back when they have been properly trained to be telling me how to do my job.  They did.  I got a phone call---took another job a few weeks later.

The point?  Never trust leaders to understand or feel empathy for what you are going through.  Do not listen to the noise.  Be smart and take care of your own.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, stirs said:

I have told my parents that church is off limits now, same with restaurants, etc.

Watching them struggle as you described earlier would be hard to handle.

My Mom is elderly and has COPD. I'm trying to not freak out.

This is how Charleston's handling testing. My friend did a Virtual MUSC visit; they said due to the limited supply of testing, only international travelers & associating with known infected could be tested.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

If we only have 15000 deaths I would consider it a raging success at containment. I fear it’s going to be 40-80 times that much or possibly more. 

As I said, the podcast doc said up to 480,000 by his calculations.  He had charts and graphs---can't argue with charts and graphs.  Agian, not sure if it was globally or nationally--but since he was comparing the numbers to the flu--I am guessing high end of the US.

A doctor/expert on one news channel (I watch them all, unlike some) said that he could see 150,000,000 people in the US diagnosed with the virus.  If true, and the mortality rate is (making this up) 1/50th of that number, that still means 3 million---a bit higher that 30,000 flu deaths per year.  I doubt nearly half the nation contracts the virus, however.  I think that was a bit Chicken Little

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, trueblade said:

My Mom is elderly and has COPD. I'm trying to not freak out.

This is how Charleston's handling testing. My friend did a Virtual MUSC visit; they said due to the limited supply of testing, only international travelers & associating with known infected could be tested.

I think, if people take this seriously and can stay isolated for a while, they can avoid it.  I was supposed to see my aunt in Myrtle beach this week---she is 75 or so--not going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, stirs said:

Actually, we have not done the draconian things China did, but have reacted much better than Italy.  Lots of the cases we have here in the US is because of Italy and people vacationing there.  Shutting down travel from parts of Asia was smart.  The shutting down from Europe should have been done a week earlier.

I think with each day, more measures could happen here.  Even state to state, never know

I don't really get the narrative that the US have reacted much better than Italy.

Even with a sub-optimal response, the first red zones were quarantined as soon as the first patient was found.

As of right now, mostly of these measures (from the article above) have been in place for 3 weeks at least

 

  • All schools are closed in all of Italy.
  • All churches are closed (including St. Peter's Basilica).
  • All weddings and funerals are postponed.
  • All restaurants are closed.
  • In fact, all stores except grocery stores and pharmacies are closed.
  • People are urged to work from home unless they work in special designated factories

Also, has been reported that "patient 0" could be from Germany, and got the virus as soon as January (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-italy-scientists/coronavirus-may-have-reached-italy-from-germany-scientists-say-idUSKBN20Y35B)

Again, when the first couple of cases were reported, thousands of tests were run in the towns of those tested positive.

Italy's response has been far from optimal, and even now people are kinda acting in a lousy way (going out for jogging, which should be avoided), but I'm really failing to see how you have reacted "much better than Italy".

https://theintercept.com/2020/03/12/italy-coronavirus-united-states-preparedness/?fbclid=IwAR1rp43U7411hkkyZqfDDTVx1IaIHakzdg2OjNc8jEMp7akf0kxnuxzr0tc

(The second part of the article is kinda meh)

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...