Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Locking down is not a political issue, it is a public health issue.

Still waiting for just one quote from an epidemiologist/virologist saying to move back slowly, like you originally claimed before you cowardly edited to a bunch of pointless nonsense.

https://www.jhsph.edu/covid-19/articles/a-plan-for-a-phased-reopening-guided-by-public-health-principles.html

https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/national-coronavirus-response-a-road-map-to-reopening/

https://www.heritage.org/press/national-coronavirus-recovery-commission-announces-five-phase-plan-reopening-america

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

lol so the AEI and Heritage foundation are both right wing "think tanks" that are referencing the Johns Hopkins paper, which I'm sure you didn't bother reading. For anyone that actually wants to be educated here's the actual link.

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/pubs_archive/pubs-pdfs/2020/200417-reopening-guidance-governors.pdf

The john's hopkins paper is not recommending loosening restrictions. It is outlining HYPOTHETICAL WAYS IT COULD HAPPEN. I just read this for you because I know you're never going to but here's the meat and potatoes. 

Quote

States should consider initiating the reopening process when (1) the number of new cases has declined for at least 14 days; (2) rapid diagnostic testing capacity is sufficient to test, at minimum, all people with COVID-19 symptoms, including mild cases, as well as close contacts and those in essential roles; (3) the healthcare system is able to safely care for all patients, including providing appropriate personal protective equipment for healthcare workers; and (4) there is sufficient public health capacity to conduct contact tracing for all new cases and their close contacts.

So no, that in no way is epidemiologists saying taking aggressive measures is over with. That's saying how things COULD move forward AFTER appropriate actions were taken. 

Which of course they never were, except in places like NYC. 

Edited by electro's horse
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

lol so the AEI and Heritage foundation are both right wing "think tanks" that are referencing the Johns Hopkins paper, which I'm sure you didn't bother reading. For anyone that actually wants to be educated here's the actual link.

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/pubs_archive/pubs-pdfs/2020/200417-reopening-guidance-governors.pdf

The john's hopkins paper is not recommending loosening restrictions. It is outlining HYPOTHETICAL WAYS IT COULD HAPPEN. I just read this for you because I know you're never going to but here's the meat and potatoes. 

So no, that in no way is epidemiologists saying taking aggressive measures is over with. That's saying how things COULD move forward AFTER appropriate actions were taken. 

Which of course they never were, except in places like NYC. 

Yes, appropriate actions were taken, because we already took appropriate actions. We are not NYC. 

 

6 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

no they are not. 

how many baseless claims are prepared to just throw out in this?

Yes, the CDC is , after the appropriate actions have been taken. Which is still opening up slowly. Do you read your own links? It seems like you just have a different opinion on if "appropriate actions" were taken. Not about opening up slowly. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NFLPA medical director Thom Mayer said the league and union are working on an N95-like device to use on face masks for when players return.

"These modified face masks, which may include some form of either surgical or N95-like material in it, for a player...getting the helmet off, putting the mask right on afterwards, maintaining social distancing when not on the field as much as possible, using single-use hydration whether it be water or Gatorade...just every little detail anybody who's got a risk, I'd advise them to be zealous, religious, and frankly maniacally committed to minimizing the chance of spreading the virus," Mayer said. The league will undoubtedly instill some form of protection for players upon returning, and that likely won't end with upgraded face masks to wear on the field and along the sidelines. Viewers should continue to prepare for a very unique season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Devil Doc said:

Yes, appropriate actions were taken, because we already took appropriate actions. We are not NYC. 

 

Yes, the CDC is , after the appropriate actions have been taken. Which is still opening up slowly. Do you read your own links? It seems like you just have a different opinion on if "appropriate actions" were taken. Not about opening up slowly. 

Exactly.  I guess he's been drinking too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Devil Doc said:

Yes, the CDC is , after the appropriate actions have been taken. Which is still opening up slowly. Do you read your own links? It seems like you just have a different opinion on if "appropriate actions" were taken. Not about opening up slowly. 

That's a huge caveat that you're just blowing past since almost NONE of the appropriate actions have been taking to start opening up. Not in Wisconsin, Georgia, or Texas. This has just been republican governors and judges saying "yeah fug it who cares."

you seem to think "do x if y" means "do x....a little"

Edited by electro's horse
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

That's a huge caveat that you're just blowing past since almost NONE of the appropriate actions have been taking to start opening up. Not in Wisconsin, Georgia, or Texas. This has just been republican governors and judges saying "yeah fug it who cares."

you seem to think "do x if y" means "do x....a little"

So have you changed your position from "nobody is recommending that" to "those states are doing it wrong?"

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

That's a huge caveat that you're just blowing past since almost NONE of the appropriate actions have been taking to start opening up. Not in Wisconsin, Georgia, or Texas. This has just been republican governors and judges saying "yeah fug it who cares."

you seem to think "do x if y" means "do x....a little"

Not really, like I said... this is not a R vs D debate on what actions have been taken. It is matter of opinion if they have are not. 

3 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

So have you changed your position from "nobody is recommending that" to "those states are doing it wrong?"

Exactly, I said.. Slow opening is recommended... I never said what the perimeters were to slowly re-open.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Paintballr said:

Should be a crime personally speaking if they knowingly released fake info in a crisis like this 

Right? I’m sure Gov Kemp (who probably should be investigated for rigging the GA election) was just following the lead of his president by altering data and releasing it to the public. Republican leaders make the mistake often that They assume the people they are talking to believe every word they say and follow them blindly. GOP is a cult and a deadly one. Playing with peoples lives. 

Edited by 4Corners
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Right? I’m sure Gov Kemp (who probably should be investigated for rigging the GA election) was just following the lead of his president by altering data and releasing it to the public. Republican leaders make the mistake often that They assume the people they are talking to believe every word they say and follow them blindly. GOP is a cult and a deadly one. Playing with peoples lives. 

You'll very rarely find me defending Trump, but even Trump has stated his disagreement with how fast and reckless Georgia has been with their reopening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You'll very rarely find me defending Trump, but even Trump has stated his disagreement with how fast and reckless Georgia has been with their reopening.

TBH, I agree Georgia has opened too fast also. Slow... is the way to go..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Things like this happen everyday. We live in a social media driven society where loyalty is a foreign concept.
    • If you draft a guy who is healthy and has no concerns about that whatsoever and he goes out and tears his ACL in his first few games in the regular season on a physical play that's a freak accident. But when you trade up to draft an RB who is already rehabbing from a recent ACL tear and he spends the next several months continuing his rehab only to tear the same ACL again after less than a handful of regular season carries in a non contact circumstance that is no freak accident. That is a textbook example of why you do not do what we did. Particularly for what is now a plug and play position. And when you have the highest paid OL in the league over the next two years. None of that makes any logical sense. Legitimately it is and was some Scott Fitterer type foolishness. Now as for XL. The guy has not been committed to his craft. I think anyone with eyes on the situation can and would recognize that. However the warning signs were there. One season of legit production raw prospect that we knew would take time to develop etc. But Morgan and Bryce Young's own father were very high on him. I think in some capacity the reality of our limitation at QB is entering into the equation. Even TMac got a lot of flak over the course of his rookie season for not being able to haul in all of Bryce's passes. At the end of the day our fourth year QB also needs to do his part to maximize the talent we have available. As far as this year. Again. WR round 1 boils down to where are we going to get the touches for the rookie? That would require eating into not only our 8th overall picks touches but also our #2 WR whom oh yeah by the way was UNDRAFTED. I am happy to discuss WR prospects here. I was thrilled we invested what we did last year in TMac because it needed to be done and it made sense from all angles. But nowhere is it written in stone that you cannot draft a good or great WR outside of the first round. Except in the Panthers building apparently. That is not a good reflection on our scouts and front office let me tell ya. Because there's no way on this earth we are going to get back to relevancy and legitimate contender status if we can't pick some gems in the later rounds. Simple and plain.
    • This is pretty accurate our offense needs more juice. I love Cooker but he’s not enough XL ummm we’ll see this year hopefully the third year WR thing hits him and he plays better but still not enough. Honestly we need look at the Eagles they just adds Wicks and Hollywood Brown to that core. That shows the level of talent needed to compete at a championship level this coming season. And this below is the real problem KC doesn’t seem to add that much to our offense. We Makai Lemon or defense at 19
×
×
  • Create New...