Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers will not tank, working more of a mixed reboot than total rebuild.


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

Still, if Cam doesn’t come back at 100% healthy and dominating, we’re going to be the top bet for first overall next year. Look at our D and OL and QB if not Cam... and seems like odds on Cam staying are slim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, t96 said:

Still, if Cam doesn’t come back at 100% healthy and dominating, we’re going to be the top bet for first overall next year. Look at our D and OL and QB if not Cam... and seems like odds on Cam staying are slim.

Yep. It all comes down to Cam's health. With a healthy Cam in Joe Brady's offense and a duct taped together patchwork of an OL and defense we can still be competitive. I'm not saying we're going to the SB, but we can compete against our competition week in and week out. Without a healthy Cam, yeah... we're in the running for a very high draft pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, t96 said:

Still, if Cam doesn’t come back at 100% healthy and dominating, we’re going to be the top bet for first overall next year. Look at our D and OL and QB if not Cam... and seems like odds on Cam staying are slim.

That's a take with incomplete information. We have no idea what our roster or other rosters are going to look like heading into training camp. Are we a top prospect for a bottom 5 roster without Cam right now? Sure thing. We might not be headed into TC, however. 

There are so many variables with being a dumpster fire #1 draft pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MountaineerChemist10 said:

That's good to hear. A mixed reboot is almost exactly what '17 Rams, Niners & Bills have done. Result? Playoff teams & SB trips. Still no SB ring but you get the picture.

A HUGE tank is similar to what the Browns, Jets & Dolphins have been doing for years. Any improvement so far? Nada.

Niners 4 years before this season:

5-11

2-14

6-10

4-12

That’s about as bad as it gets, hardly a “reboot.”

 

Rams before their first playoff year with McVay, all the way back to 2007:

3-13

2-14

1-15

7-9

2-14

7-8-1

7-9

6-10

7-9 (also after this year traded a ton of draft capital up to 1st overall for Goff)

4-12

 

Bills hovered between 6 and 9 wins for years.

 

Not really the best comparisons, and they haven’t even really had any success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

That's a take with incomplete information. We have no idea what our roster or other rosters are going to look like heading into training camp. Are we a top prospect for a bottom 5 roster without Cam right now? Sure thing. We might not be headed into TC, however. 

There are so many variables with being a dumpster fire #1 draft pick. 

You can only add so much talent in one offseason, even with a high pick like we have. And it’s been widely reported we’re not going to be “spenders” in FA.

 

With healthy MVP level Cam I see fringe 9-10 win playoff team at best, without him, no matter who we add (unless it’s a top QB this draft that we play and who is good), I don’t see better than 4 wins, likely less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...