Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton: "They gave up on me"


NAS

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Delhomme2Muhammad said:

Alright, we get it it. You're a hard ass.

You're so indoctrinated in being a hard ass and that "This is the NFL" that you can't see the forest for the trees.

Even if you're so butt hurt about Newton that you think Smith is the best Panthers player ever. Newton is then second best. So along with how Smith got treated, we've now shafted Newton. You won't be able to pin this one on Gettleman. We've shown the NFL that regardless of who's part of the regime, top Panthers players will get shafted.

Next in line is McCaffrey. It'll now be a question on whether he or the regime pulls the trigger first. But after what's occurred, no question his gun is loaded.

it's actually not so much that I'm a hard ass as it is that you think billion dollar businesses should make decisions based on emotions.

Doesn't work that way.

This is the real world. Get used to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Delhomme2Muhammad said:

Wrong!

49ers may've dropped Montana. But that's after a few years of Young being his back up. It's not like "moving on" from him was a complete surprise to Joe.

Had it been a salary cap league back then, Montana and Young would not have been on the same team.

Rice, Smith and Sherman don't play qb. I'm not sure what their relationship is with the team, or how their legacy is seen.

You think nothing's happened with the Colts dumping Manning? In actual fact, one of the worst things has happened. Manning is a legendary player. Despite being there for 14 years and winning a SB, Indy will forever have to share the legacy/history of Manning with the Broncos. That actually diminishes their own history and reputation.

Indy can't claim Manning as their own. Manning is going into the HoF, but it won't be clear cut as a Colt. Manning equalled (or bettered) his accomplishments with Indy at the Broncos.  This enhances Manning's reputation, but diminishes the Colts.

History will show Indy shafted their legendary player for Andrew Luck. History will show it was a silly decision and the Colts will wear the brunt of it. They've now become a nothing, vanilla team. They were better off keeping Manning and letting him peter out.

It's similar with Kurt Warner. He didn't want to leave the Rams. It's just a dumbass in Mike Martz made the choice of replacing him with Marc Bulger. It was a logical choice, Warner was injured and Bulger is a good qb. How did that work out for them? Bulger was a good player, but did not match the heights of Warner's career. Warner then accomplished the extraordinary feat of getting the Cardinals to the SB, while the Rams were pathetic.

You're seem to be so caught up in the "business" side and "how the NFL is" that you don't recognise how many times they lead to stupid decisions.

Yeah...Quick tip. Nobody cares.

In every one of these situations and a hundred more, people were angry at the time but then let it go later on.

There were no lasting consequences, and no matter how much you want them to be, there won't be here either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I lived in the Bay Area when the 49ers moved on from Montana.  Discounting the uproar that move created is convenient, but naive.  Remember, Montana was the face of four Super Bowls.  That put his head up on Mt. Rushmore with 49er fans.

It was accepted that Young was almost certainly Montana's successor.  The question was when, and the general feeling of the fans and Montana was it would happen when he was ready.  The 49ers pulled the trigger before Montana and the fans were willing to accept.  The only thing Young waiting in the wings did was prevent the fans from turning on him, but even so, he received his share of criticism until they won a Super Bowl after the 1994 season.

So yes, Montana pretty much knew what the plan was, but that was never the issue.  The timing and how it was handled were the issues.

The major difference between that situation and this one was the number of people who minimized what Young was capable of was almost nonexistent.  But, unless he won a few more Super Bowls, many fans were never going to accept him.  Some held grudges against him for just being there, but nobody was questioning his ability.  Still, he was seen as very good, but not Joe Montana.

People can minimize the Marcus Allen situation with the Raiders as much as they want to make them feel like this situation is worse, but it still stands as the most vindictive, classless way an organization could handle an inevitable parting of the ways.  Allen essentially lost 3 years of his career standing on the sidelines because he was in Al Davis' doghouse.  Davis tried to ruin the latter stages of Allen's career, after he willingly split time with Bo Jackson.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sgt Schultz said:

I lived in the Bay Area when the 49ers moved on from Montana.  Discounting the uproar that move created is convenient, but naive.  Remember, Montana was the face of four Super Bowls.  That put his head up on Mt. Rushmore with 49er fans.

It was accepted that Young was almost certainly Montana's successor.  The question was when, and the general feeling of the fans and Montana was it would happen when he was ready.  The 49ers pulled the trigger before Montana and the fans were willing to accept.  The only thing Young waiting in the wings did was prevent the fans from turning on him, but even so, he received his share of criticism until they won a Super Bowl after the 1994 season.

So yes, Montana pretty much knew what the plan was, but that was never the issue.  The timing and how it was handled were the issues.

The major difference between that situation and this one was the number of people who minimized what Young was capable of was almost nonexistent.  But, unless he won a few more Super Bowls, many fans were never going to accept him.  Some held grudges against him for just being there, but nobody was questioning his ability.  Still, he was seen as very good, but not Joe Montana.

People can minimize the Marcus Allen situation with the Raiders as much as they want to make them feel like this situation is worse, but it still stands as the most vindictive, classless way an organization could handle an inevitable parting of the ways.  Allen essentially lost 3 years of his career standing on the sidelines because he was in Al Davis' doghouse.  Davis tried to ruin the latter stages of Allen's career, after he willingly split time with Bo Jackson.

Well to be clear, I'm not discounting that there was fan anger (and plenty of it) in each and every one of those situations...just like there is now.

My actual point though is that fan anger over a player release is something that hardly ever leads to any actual consequences. Heck, even teams like the Raiders who consistently handle things terribly still get free agents, coaches, etc.

As I've said before, I have no problem with the transaction, though it's true that the Panthers did a terrible job with both PR and how they dealt directly with Newton.

But even with that acknowledged, do I expect any serious fallout from it?

Not really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Well to be clear, I'm not discounting that there was fan anger (and plenty of it) in each and every one of those situations.

My actual point though is that fan anger over a player release is something that hardly ever leads to any actual consequences. Heck, even teams like the Raiders who consistently handle things terribly still get free agents, coaches, etc.

As I've said before, I have no problem with the transaction, though it's true that the Panthers did a terrible job with both PR and how they dealt directly with Newton.

But even with that acknowledged, do I expect any serious fallout from it?

Not really.

I don't either. 

Every time something like this happens, the howls of "no FA will ever want to come here" and "the fans are going to boycott/leave in mass" come out.  It takes a long history of sustained buffoonery for either of those things to happen to any noticeable degree.  Let's put it this way: the Lions, Browns, Cowboys, and Raiders all still sign FAs and all still have plenty of fans.  Dan Snyder has been undercutting his own organization and screwing things up for 20 years now, and Redskin fans still pack the stadium, complain about their plight, and FAs still sign there. 

FAs will generally go where the money leads them.  Fans have a hard time coordinating any response, largely because being a fan is an emotional thing, not a rational one. 

My point citing those examples was that this is not the worst-handled parting nor the biggest outrage ever.  It is not second, either, and so far we are just talking about the NFL. 

Somewhere, some Psych student is reading this board and assessing what percent is stuck between the middle three stages of grief: Anger, Bargaining, and Depression. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

I don't either. 

Every time something like this happens, the howls of "no FA will ever want to come here" and "the fans are going to boycott/leave in mass" come out.  It takes a long history of sustained buffoonery for either of those things to happen to any noticeable degree.  Let's put it this way: the Lions, Browns, Cowboys, and Raiders all still sign FAs and all still have plenty of fans.  Dan Snyder has been undercutting his own organization and screwing things up for 20 years now, and Redskin fans still pack the stadium, complain about their plight, and FAs still sign there. 

FAs will generally go where the money leads them.  Fans have a hard time coordinating any response, largely because being a fan is an emotional thing, not a rational one. 

My point citing those examples was that this is not the worst-handled parting nor the biggest outrage ever.  It is not second, either, and so far we are just talking about the NFL. 

Somewhere, some Psych student is reading this board and assessing what percent is stuck between the middle three stages of grief: Anger, Bargaining, and Depression. 

Fair...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/27/2020 at 10:50 AM, rodeo said:

  

 

DPOY is not even near the same level as league MVP. Cam was also OPOY, that equals out with Luke's DPOY. and now you add Cam's League MVP award on top of that.

Luke is vastly overrated by this fanbase and has been through most of his career when he was the centerpiece of terrible defenses. he's a good linebacker, sure, about the same on the field as Bobby Wagner, who people aren't discussing as a "first ballot."

Wagner will be a HOF.

You can throw all thr awards you want out there Cam just doesnt have the consistency over his career.  He was on a HOF path surely before injuries but he would have needed to keep improving his completion % and td ratio to keep up with the prolific passers of his era.  Aside from 2015 he had way too many turnovers to be considered elite.  Too bad our poo show organization couldnt protect him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/29/2020 at 1:34 PM, mrcompletely11 said:

Jesus dude, its because the word is out he is still hurt.  And the corona thing hasnt helped because teams cannot check him out on their own.  This aint rocket science.

 
Hurt?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...