Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top OTs in the draft - Wirfs/Wills


onmyown

Recommended Posts

I may be in the minority here but if Simmons, Okudah, Brown, and these two guys were still on the board I’d take Wirfs. And I wouldn’t be mad with Wills. 

As I’ve been saying for a while now (beating a dead horse) all 20 teams who made the super bowl in the last decade had a top 10 ranked oline (exception being the 2015 Broncos *punches self in balls*).

That’s a huge stat to me. 

I know it’s unreasonable to expect Hurney to admit Little may of been a mistake (or Armanti for that matter), or at least may not turn out, but I think he can try out for gaurd. Okung maybe has a year left. And I’d love to see him teach Wirfs, not Little, to be the future.

Anyways, it’s slow here on the huddle so here is what I think is a decent video on these two guys worth watching, the classic debate of higher ceiling/natural talent that requires coaching vs. more pro ready:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MMA said:

You Crazy GIF by memecandy

I don't think it's all that crazy to be honest. We've already watched one franchise QB have his career altered by injuries in large part due to playing behind a poor OL season after season. We saw it happen to Luck in Indy too. We're probably going to draft another one within the next year or two. Wanna see history repeat itself? If we don't change our approach to building an OL there's a good chance that it will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great video. Wirfs looks like a freak athlete but needs a coach that believes they can coach him to his potential. Wills looks very good and polished. I would love either one of these guys for us. Both make Little look like a backup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never a bad idea to get a top offensive tackle if he's available. Would be 100% cool with it. Not flashy but one of the most important positions and we have been screwing around and not addressing it for too long. You want Brady's offense to work, you need a stout offensive line 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

Never a bad idea to get a top offensive tackle if he's available. Would be 100% cool with it. Not flashy but one of the most important positions and we have been screwing around and not addressing it for too long. You want Brady's offense to work, you need a stout offensive line 

I think that's what a lot of people are missing. If Brady wants to run a lot of four and five wide sets, you better have an OL. One of the things that made Burrow very successful in that offense is that he showed some Mahomes type ability to buy time with his legs and deliver some unbelievable throws on the move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think it's all that crazy to be honest. We've already watched one franchise QB have his career altered by injuries in large part due to playing behind a poor OL season after season. We saw it happen to Luck in Indy too. We're probably going to draft another one within the next year or two. Wanna see history repeat itself? If we don't change our approach to building an OL there's a good chance that it will.

Okung and Moton are the day 1 starter. Little is going to have his chance to compete and be the long term left or right tackle. Panthers fans complained and cried a lot about the kid but I like what I saw from Little last year. He was a rookie and didn’t even look close to as bad as Matt Kalil. What we need is not one, but “two” guards. Please tell me who our starting guards are. If Teddy is going to get kill this year, it’ll will be from the interior with Matt Paradis and the unknown guards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MMA said:

Okung and Moton are the day 1 starter. Little is going to have his chance to compete and be the long term left or right tackle. Panthers fans complained and cried a lot about the kid but I like what I saw from Little last year. He was a rookie and didn’t even look close to as bad as Matt Kalil. What we need is not one, but “two” guards. Please tell me who our starting guards are. If Teddy is going to get kill this year, it’ll will be from the interior with Matt Paradis and the unknown guards. 

I wouldn't be making decisions based on Teddy Bridgewater. I'd be trying to build a long-term OL for our next franchise QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, MMA said:

Okung and Moton are the day 1 starter. Little is going to have his chance to compete and be the long term left or right tackle. Panthers fans complained and cried a lot about the kid but I like what I saw from Little last year. He was a rookie and didn’t even look close to as bad as Matt Kalil. What we need is not one, but “two” guards. Please tell me who our starting guards are. If Teddy is going to get kill this year, it’ll will be from the interior with Matt Paradis and the unknown guards. 

Ideally I would not be upset if we went for a couple guards in Rounds 3-5 I did one mock and took centers in 3&4 . I wouldn't mind having a utility OL guy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're going to have to get lucky with the OL it seems.  In what looks to be a defense heavy draft for us, it's an absolute mistake if we don't touch the OL. 

Who on the current OL is for sure here after next year and proven anything?  Moton and...?  Paradis will be cut, Okung is expiring, Little/Daley who knows, and we've signed or have a JAG or two.  If the plan is to go all in for a QB next year with Lawrence or Fields, how are we getting an OL to put in front of them? We won't have the draft capital after what I assume would be a massive package to trade up for our QB.  So, FA might be the only answer as we re-sign CMC, Moore, Moton, etc. at the same time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hardest thing about the draft is getting past the concept of instant gratification.

You draft for the next decade, not the next year.

To know that the answer at LT is on the roster is a huge plus. 

If you think 31-year old, one-year deal Okung and Greg, "don't hit me in the head" Little are the answer, and you had this opportunity and took a DT instead, it could haunt you for a decade.

These guys are RTs, but one was a RT because his qb was left handed. 

If drafts are not based on needs, what would you pick:  A franchise LT or a stud DT?  We will have that option.

There is a big part of me that wants a LT for the rebuild.  Do not discount the idea.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Waldo said:

Great video. Wirfs looks like a freak athlete but needs a coach that believes they can coach him to his potential. Wills looks very good and polished. I would love either one of these guys for us. Both make Little look like a backup. 

Nice descriptions.  Wills is the best OT in the past decade.  I am in the closet about wanting him--knowing that we prolly won't do it. I really do not see Gettlemen passing on him, even if Simmons is on the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you justify taking Wills at #7?  Play him at RT for a season and move Moton to LG.  Moton is in a contract year, so you are not hemmed in if you can move Wills to LT or keep him at RT and play Little at LT.

However, I can say that I am not sold that the OL will be addressed, based on comments and free agency.  Gettlemen will probably take Wills in round 1 and Ruiz (C) in round 2.  His rep in NY is based on drafting Jones (QB) and he needs to protect him.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This was soooo spot on about everything from the board environment to the QB guru extremist terrible takes. I wish more people on this board would elevate their energy and knowledge so we could have a fun board again. Cheers to better Panther Fan Culture.
    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
×
×
  • Create New...