Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The importance of pass defense


AU-panther

Recommended Posts

In another thread I talked about the importance of run defense, specifically that is a bit over rated by many fans and teams.

To be fair I need to use the same metric I applied for run defense and look to see if there is a correlation with pass defense.

Just like in the run defense thread I'm going to look at yards per attempt, not total yard per game.  The reason for this is simple, those numbers can be influenced more by score, basically if a team is losing they will probably start throwing it more, so the winning team is less likely to give up less yards on the ground per game.

In recap 9/12 of the playoff teams were in the bottom half of yards allowed per attempt rushing, basically they have bad rush defense.

In regards to passing:

9/12 of the playoff teams were in the top half in yards allowed per attempt passing, basically they were good at stopping the pass

5/12 were in the top 10

also both teams in the Super Bowl were in the top 10

In summery: 

top half of the league = good, bottom half of league = bad

75% of the playoff teams were good at stopping the pass

75% of the playoff teams were bad at stopping the run

Looking at it another way:

9/12 playoff teams were good at stopping the pass

3/12 playoff teams were good at stopping the run

2/12 playoff teams were good at both (Saints and Eagles

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2019/opp.htm

I'm not saying stopping the run isn't important, everything you do on the football field is important, but the fact is some facets of the game are more influential in wins and losses then others.

Its a passing league, being good at stopping it increases your chances of winning more than being good at stopping the run.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

In another thread I talked about the importance of run defense, specifically that is a bit over rated by many fans and teams.

To be fair I need to use the same metric I applied for run defense and look to see if there is a correlation with pass defense.

Just like in the run defense thread I'm going to look at yards per attempt, not total yard per game.  The reason for this is simple, those numbers can be influenced more by score, basically if a team is losing they will probably start throwing it more, so the winning team is less likely to give up less yards on the ground per game.

In recap 9/12 of the playoff teams were in the bottom half of yards allowed per attempt rushing, basically they have bad rush defense.

In regards to passing:

9/12 of the playoff teams were in the top half in yards allowed per attempt passing, basically they were good at stopping the pass

5/12 were in the top 10

also both teams in the Super Bowl were in the top 10

In summery: 

top half of the league = good, bottom half of league = bad

75% of the playoff teams were good at stopping the pass

75% of the playoff teams were bad at stopping the run

Looking at it another way:

9/12 playoff teams were good at stopping the pass

3/12 playoff teams were good at stopping the run

2/12 playoff teams were good at both (Saints and Eagles

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2019/opp.htm

I'm not saying stopping the run isn't important, everything you do on the football field is important, but the fact is some facets of the game are more influential in wins and losses then others.

Its a passing league, being good at stopping it increases your chances of winning more than being good at stopping the run.

 

 

Most teams in the playoffs had a good, if not great offense, to compensate for defensive efficiencies. We did not.

I feel like we were also the only team in the NFL that consistently let teams just rip off 5 yard run after 5 yard run against us. I'd much rather a team run for 80 yards on 1 play and then 20 yards on the other 19 runs than just consistently run it for 5 yards every play against me. We also allowed far and away the most rushing TDs (8 more than 2nd worst), which tells me when it got to gut check time in the red zone, our D just rolled over and died as teams ran it down their throat for a TD. We also allowed the most rushing 1st downs (4 more than 2nd worst). Luckily, we were only 2nd worst in %age of total yards that were rushing yards against (38.3%), only to the Browns (40.0%)

Honestly, we should look at what Tampa did to revitalize their D in 1 year. They drafted Vea and signed Suh and all of a sudden they became the best run D in the NFL (from 124 rushing ypg allowed in 2018 to 74 ypg allowed in 2019) and forced teams to be 1-dimensional. unfortunately for them, their secondary wasn't great and Winston threw a million INTs. We need to follow the same blueprint and draft Brown and rebuild the interior of our defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah KC would not have been able to come back in those games if it was for their offense...and oddly enough it was their run defense that slowed down the Titans.

That said, obviously pass defense is important. I'm just a little old school. I think there is a little bit of a pass defense/pass rush formula here that is more important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Most teams in the playoffs had a good, if not great offense, to compensate for defensive efficiencies. We did not.

I feel like we were also the only team in the NFL that consistently let teams just rip off 5 yard run after 5 yard run against us. I'd much rather a team run for 80 yards on 1 play and then 20 yards on the other 19 runs than just consistently run it for 5 yards every play against me. We also allowed far and away the most rushing TDs (8 more than 2nd worst), which tells me when it got to gut check time in the red zone, our D just rolled over and died as teams ran it down their throat for a TD. We also allowed the most rushing 1st downs (4 more than 2nd worst). Luckily, we were only 2nd worst in %age of total yards that were rushing yards against (38.3%), only to the Browns (40.0%)

Honestly, we should look at what Tampa did to revitalize their D in 1 year. They drafted Vea and signed Suh and all of a sudden they became the best run D in the NFL (from 124 rushing ypg allowed in 2018 to 74 ypg allowed in 2019) and forced teams to be 1-dimensional. unfortunately for them, their secondary wasn't great and Winston threw a million INTs. We need to follow the same blueprint and draft Brown and rebuild the interior of our defense.

Why would we look at Tampa Bay?  They improved their rush defense to first in the league, based off of yards per attempt, and their defense was still bottom 5 in points allowed.  Maybe they should have improved their pass rush and/or secondary.

Just further validates the point that stopping the run is overrated.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KC had a defense that is skewed by these numbers much like most stats. It’s a reason that it’s tough to depend on cherry picked incomplete stats for answers. Anyone can make any argument by cherry picking what they need for support.

they got really behind Against Tennessee and the 49ers. Their first half stats were terrible.  A lot of their games were like that all year.

Their second half defense is what bailed them out of those games. They were a total shut down.

if I cherry pick 2nd half defensive teams,.. I wouldn’t be surprised to find them top 5 against the run and pass. They would adjust to what the other team did well and shut that poo down as Negan would say,.. ha.

keep in mind that everything also goes in cycles.

its happened plenty of times in the past that teams started winning by being pass happy. Dan Marino made Buddy Ryan and the 46 look totally inept and out of date.

many teams followed suit and it was a passing league.  Then came the bigger teams that smashed the little fast teams like the Dallas Cowboys and others.

everything went smash mouth again until it was too heavy and the faster passing teams were able to take advantage and come back.

tennessee proved there is a weakness there and so did the Panthers in 2015 and the 49ers last year.

the pass happy teams are going to get smashed and the people that think it’s irrelevant don’t pay attention to history.

smash mouth will come back and and then pass happy will,..

cycles man,.. history,.. people repeat it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CanadianCat said:

I agree. Which is why Simmons at 7 would be a better pick than a DL - even though that position group is weaker. 

 

The other thing with that is that CB's are cheaper than DL's and that also helps with building a roster.  

 

Your defensive line a huge function of your pass defense. You have to put pressure on the QB in order to keep your secondary and LBers from getting burned in coverage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, JARROD said:

the pass happy teams are going to get smashed and the people that think it’s irrelevant don’t pay attention to history.

smash mouth will come back and and then pass happy will,..

cycles man,.. history,.. people repeat it.

Exactly. Thats why we dominated for a time in the Fox era when we had "double trouble" running the rock. The league had been changing to smaller OL and smaller faster LB's. Hurney and Fox went with bigger OL and drafted JStew and we literally smashed people. 

 

Still one of my favorite all time pics... 

 

9194847.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DL is a lot more influential in pass defense than DBs are in run defense. LBs are a lot more influential in run defense than they are in pass defense. It’s all interconnected and it comes down to coaching and schemes. What’s our weakest group on defense right now? Arguably its DL.  We should focus on the lines. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Madwolf said:

Your defensive line a huge function of your pass defense. You have to put pressure on the QB in order to keep your secondary and LBers from getting burned in coverage. 

I dont disagree but I feel like the value at #7 is better at LB than at inside DL. We need a more bodies at DL but I feel like the value of a top end LB is greater than a top end LB. 

That being said if we draft Brown at #7 I would call that a good pick (cause we need players there) but if both guys are available then LB would be my choice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They both should not be neglected, are complementary of each other and need to be addressed. I wouldn't mind skewing more on the passing side, just nothing drastic. Good news is that we have a lot of room for improvement and it shouldn't be difficult to improve both this year and start heading in the right direction with our D.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Madwolf said:

Your defensive line a huge function of your pass defense. You have to put pressure on the QB in order to keep your secondary and LBers from getting burned in coverage. 

but if you can't cover for the first 3-4 secs, it doesn't matter who you have on your line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we should draft Okudah or Simmons really.

whens the last time we ever drafted a top 10 corner? Actually when have we drafted a top 10 receiver? Ha.

Okudah, Simmons or Jeudy are my picks for 7 if we don’t take a quarterback somehow(Tua).

Next would be OT...

I think DT is my last of these picks. For the record I would still be happy so there’s no argument there. I wouldn’t cry is our whole draft is defense except a 2nd or 3rd being used for an exciting receiver.. sorry but Samuel has to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...