Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2nd round will be telling about our rebuild...


saX man

Recommended Posts

I just see so much available talent...

CBs: Diggs, Gladney, Fulton, Johnson, Noah I, Dantzler

WRs: Reagor, Hamler, Aiyuk, Pittman

DE/5T: Davidson, Terrell Lewis, Jon Greenard, Darrell Taylor (overlooked), Alton Robinson

LB: Logan Wilson, Uche, Malik Harrison, Davis-Gaither

S: Dugger, Chinn

C/G: Ruiz, Cushenberry, Hennessy

All I'm saying is get ready for a potential out of nowhere selection if it's not James Lynch (lawls).

Anyone jump out to y'all?  Content with staying put?   Maybe trading down and getting an extra 3rd or 4th? 

Let's hear it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, it's gotta be a CB.  Rhule gets a new guy at every level of the defense including one of his own, and the rest of the picks become true BPA based on our board.  Would love some OL, but just feel like it's going to get ignored since we're "better" off there right now and Hurney is surely still high on the guys he took last year. 

1st - Simmons

2nd - CB

3rd - Lynch - - and just praying it's not a trade up into the 2nd to grab him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

marty hurney 2nd round picks

amini silatolu
eric shelton
jimmy clausen
dwayne jarrett
rashaan gaulden
donte jackson
greg little
richard marshall (solid)
ryan kalil (good)
keary colbert

our 2nd round pick is almost certainly going to be horrific, streaming garbage. no reason to expect anything else since its been over ten years since hurney selected a good player in the 2nd round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Zithers2 said:

marty hurney 2nd round picks

amini silatolu
eric shelton
jimmy clausen
dwayne jarrett
rashaan gaulden
donte jackson
greg little
richard marshall (solid)
ryan kalil (good)
keary colbert

our 2nd round pick is almost certainly going to be horrific, streaming garbage. no reason to expect anything else since its been over ten years since hurney selected a good player in the 2nd round.

Not trying to defend Marty at all but "good" is drastically underselling Ryan Kalil. He was a 5 time Pro Bowler and a 2 time All-Pro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, saX man said:

Uche

I really like this dude !!!!! 

Dugger also...

And that nickle out of LA tech I believe .. Robertson (but he's a 3-4)

Our second will be whoever falls out of the first who halfway meets a need ...that tends to be the Hurney way of not fuggin up (See Little,  Clausen, Jackson). Then after the 2nd we usually draft based on need and add 2 contributers on ST. 

Btw, you might as well pencil in Lynch being a Panther btw.. 3rd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, saX man said:

I just see so much available talent...

CBs: Diggs, Gladney, Fulton, Johnson, Noah I, Dantzler

WRs: Reagor, Hamler, Aiyuk, Pittman

DE/5T: Davidson, Terrell Lewis, Jon Greenard, Darrell Taylor (overlooked), Alton Robinson

LB: Logan Wilson, Uche, Malik Harrison, Davis-Gaither

S: Dugger, Chinn

C/G: Ruiz, Cushenberry, Hennessy

All I'm saying is get ready for a potential out of nowhere selection if it's not James Lynch (lawls).

Anyone jump out to y'all?  Content with staying put?   Maybe trading down and getting an extra 3rd or 4th? 

Let's hear it!

A lot of these stand out---of course, it depends on what we do in round 1, but I see CB as the position difficult to escape---our biggest need, and likely NOT addressed in Round 1-we need a starter good enough to keep Jackson on the #2---it HAS to be a CB.

Having said that, if it is not, Ruiz would be difficult to pass up if you are thinking long term. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Zithers2 said:

marty hurney 2nd round picks

amini silatolu
eric shelton
jimmy clausen
dwayne jarrett
rashaan gaulden
donte jackson
greg little
richard marshall (solid)
ryan kalil (good)
keary colbert

our 2nd round pick is almost certainly going to be horrific, streaming garbage. no reason to expect anything else since its been over ten years since hurney selected a good player in the 2nd round.

I think there is a reason for this--Marty once said (about the Armanti Edwards trade up) that he tried to move up for Clausen and when he fell to us, he felt that pick was like "house money."  (paraphrasing his longer answer).  I heard this on the radio and nearly put my '74 classic Gremlin into a guard rail.  Had I known how bad both were going to be, I would have.  (disclaimer:  I never owned a 74 Gremlin, but it made the story better).

What kind of friggin logic is that?  I think Marty is looking for that immediate impact, first round explosion so he can get his "atta boy" and then he just sucks after that.  According to NFL statistics-and by these numbers there is no excuse for any GM keeping a job--Marty should be hitting on the following:

First of all, the first round, broken down (RIOT REPORT citing PFF):

image.png.2f298f0c8abb87abdcc09761c0bc4820.png

Not too good for pick #7.

Here it is broken down by position but these numbers are for "upper tier" first rounders--how many become elite, based on their formula.  (I am looking for second round data like this, but I thought I would share round 1 data for perspective):

image.png.fa788cca19f15060c8acc220f4dbd9b5.png

More in my next post in this thread...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Found this on an KC site dated 2015.  It breaks down success by round by position.  If we go CB in the second round, we have a 46% chance of success.

1st Round - OL (83%) LB (70%) TE (67%) DB (64%) QB (63%) WR (58%) RB (58%) DL (58%)

2nd Round - OL (70%) LB (55%) TE (50%) WR (49%) DB (46%) QB (27%) DL (26%) RB (25%)

3rd Round - OL (40%) TE (39%) LB (34%) DL (27%) WR (25%) DB (24%) QB (17%) RB (16%)

4th Round - DL (37%) TE (33%) OL (29%) LB (16%) WR(12%) DB (11%) RB (11%) QB (8%)

5th Round - TE (32%) DB (17%) WR (16%) OL (16%) DL (13%) RB (9%) LB (4%) QB (0%)

6th Round - TE (26%) OL (16%) DL (13%) WR (9%) DB (8%) RB (6%) LB (5%) QB (0%)

7th Round - DB (11%) OL (9%) QB (6%) WR (5%) DL (3%) LB (2%) RB (0%) TE (0%)

https://www.arrowheadpride.com/2015/2/20/8072877/what-the-statistics-tell-us-about-the-draft-by-round#pgh/31/6788.133544921875

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, saX man said:

I just see so much available talent...

CBs: Diggs, Gladney, Fulton, Johnson, Noah I, Dantzler

WRs: Reagor, Hamler, Aiyuk, Pittman

DE/5T: Davidson, Terrell Lewis, Jon Greenard, Darrell Taylor (overlooked), Alton Robinson

LB: Logan Wilson, Uche, Malik Harrison, Davis-Gaither

S: Dugger, Chinn

C/G: Ruiz, Cushenberry, Hennessy

All I'm saying is get ready for a potential out of nowhere selection if it's not James Lynch (lawls).

Anyone jump out to y'all?  Content with staying put?   Maybe trading down and getting an extra 3rd or 4th? 

Let's hear it!

Take on of the C/G that would be on the board.  Making sure we have a center for next year and understands our system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Found this on an KC site dated 2015.  It breaks down success by round by position.  If we go CB in the second round, we have a 46% chance of success.

1st Round - OL (83%) LB (70%) TE (67%) DB (64%) QB (63%) WR (58%) RB (58%) DL (58%)

2nd Round - OL (70%) LB (55%) TE (50%) WR (49%) DB (46%) QB (27%) DL (26%) RB (25%)

rd Round - OL (40%) TE (39%) LB (34%) DL (27%) WR (25%) DB (24%) QB (17%) RB (16%)

4th Round - DL (37%) TE (33%) OL (29%) LB (16%) WR(12%) DB (11%) RB (11%) QB (8%)

5th Round - TE (32%) DB (17%) WR (16%) OL (16%) DL (13%) RB (9%) LB (4%) QB (0%)

6th Round - TE (26%) OL (16%) DL (13%) WR (9%) DB (8%) RB (6%) LB (5%) QB (0%)

7th Round - DB (11%) OL (9%) QB (6%) WR (5%) DL (3%) LB (2%) RB (0%) TE (0%)

https://www.arrowheadpride.com/2015/2/20/8072877/what-the-statistics-tell-us-about-the-draft-by-round#pgh/31/6788.133544921875

According to this chart, DLs have done better in the fourth round than all other rounds except for the first....DBs have a rather substantial drop off after 2 rounds....Offensive Line is your best chance for success in the first three rounds than other positions...LB is a pretty safe pick, based on these numbers.

Based on our needs and that we are likley to go QB, DT, or LB in round 1, CB has to be the second round selection.  However, CB is deeper this year than in years past, so you might get away with an early 3rd.  OL (Ruiz for example) in the second round is a very safe pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me it depends on our pick at 7

If we go defense, I want to stay defense through the first 4 rounds, let them grow together and learn to play together from the start.

Simmons at 7 -  then get Gladney in the 2nd, and Raekwon Davis in the 3rd

Okudah at 7 - then get Blacklock or Davidson in the 2nd, and BPA in 3rd

Brown at 7 - then Gladney in 2nd, and BPA in 3rd

Let these guys grow and learn to play together

Same with offense, if we draft a Tackle early, stay offense and let them grow and learn together by playing together. 

Tackle at 7 - then Cesar Ruiz at 38, and BPA at 68...if Ruiz is not there, then best WR available at 38, and Cushenberry or Biadasz at 68 (one of them will be there)

Get tackle and center and letting them grow and learn to play together. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I think there is a reason for this--Marty once said (about the Armanti Edwards trade up) that he tried to move up for Clausen and when he fell to us, he felt that pick was like "house money."  (paraphrasing his longer answer).  I heard this on the radio and nearly put my '74 classic Gremlin into a guard rail.  Had I known how bad both were going to be, I would have.  (disclaimer:  I never owned a 74 Gremlin, but it made the story better).

What kind of friggin logic is that?  I think Marty is looking for that immediate impact, first round explosion so he can get his "atta boy" and then he just sucks after that.  According to NFL statistics-and by these numbers there is no excuse for any GM keeping a job--Marty should be hitting on the following:

First of all, the first round, broken down (RIOT REPORT citing PFF):

image.png.2f298f0c8abb87abdcc09761c0bc4820.png

Not too good for pick #7.

Here it is broken down by position but these numbers are for "upper tier" first rounders--how many become elite, based on their formula.  (I am looking for second round data like this, but I thought I would share round 1 data for perspective):

image.png.fa788cca19f15060c8acc220f4dbd9b5.png

More in my next post in this thread...

So for pick 7 you could get 18 and 31, so

51.4% or 51.4% and 47%

So much for one quarter for two dimes.

Looks more like one quarter for two quarters.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It was in the updated roster thread. All signings and waver pickups are in there.
    • Great move Panthers.  Hope he is proven to take the #2 spot.  "Keep Pounding"🤩
    • this is where the Bryce defense goes off the rails for me.  We all know Bryce isn't a deep ball chunk play QB.  He doesn't have those physical tools and he doesn't play the game w/ that mindset.  It simply is not what he is.  Then you got folks going essentially going, well actually Shaq was a very efficient 3 pt shooter this season.  He shot 50% from behind the arc and Steph Curry was only at 48%.  So yeah, Shaq is a very effective 3 pt shooter.  Don't say he isn't a 3 point shooter.  Meanwhile, Shaq went 1 of 2 on the season and Steph shot 9343924 3s.  Russell Wilson is a deep ball chunk QB.  Baker is. Geno was his comeback season (best in the league that year I think is the correct call).  That's the Canales pass tree. EVERY QB throws deep at some point.  Arguing you can find a good grade when they went deep one week is just that.   No one can argue Bryce plays the game like a young Wilson throwing f you hail marys downfield.   Jake Delhomme fits Canales more than any Carolina Panther QB.  Teddy Bridgewater can grade out efficiently on his deep passes.  That doesn't make him a deep ball chunk QB.  2 totally different convos.    It would be better for everyone IMO if our org accepted what the unicorn was and built a team around that given they invested so much in him.....which is the criticism I started day 1 when they put him in Frank Reich's offense.  He didn't fit that.  He doesn't fit the Canales tree either.    NFL is about fit more than anything and it's what Carolina gets most wrong.  We essentially run offenses we don't have the QB talent for and you can say the same w/ the 3-4 D.  That's the Bryce era.  
×
×
  • Create New...