Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers willing to trade back?


NAS

Recommended Posts

If we trade back, then it means that a team wants to move up for a QB most likely.  And it means one of the QB has dropped to 7, either Tua or Herbert.

If they drop that means another player took their spot.  Conservatively, Burrow, Young, Okudah, Simmons, and one of the QBs.  Brown also is definitely a candidate to be gone as well. 

If that is the case, we would have to choose between one of a super deep OL class (which we can pick up later in the first), or a WR (also super deep, which I don't think this team is looking at) and the dropping QB (regardless of what you think of Teddy, this coaching staff believes in him).

If the Raiders offer us both their firsts, it's a no brainer.  Same for Miami.  I say tell the Raiders that Miami offered us both their picks and a first next year, and see if they bite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tijo said:

If we trade back, then it means that a team wants to move up for a QB most likely.  And it means one of the QB has dropped to 7, either Tua or Herbert.

If they drop that means another player took their spot.  Conservatively, Burrow, Young, Okudah, Simmons, and one of the QBs.  Brown also is definitely a candidate to be gone as well. 

If that is the case, we would have to choose between one of a super deep OL class (which we can pick up later in the first), or a WR (also super deep, which I don't think this team is looking at) and the dropping QB (regardless of what you think of Teddy, this coaching staff believes in him).

If the Raiders offer us both their firsts, it's a no brainer.  Same for Miami.  I say tell the Raiders that Miami offered us both their picks and a first next year, and see if they bite.

Why would Dolphins offer us their two lower 1st round picks for #7 when they could've just taken the QB at #5?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys need to pay attention to the draft value charts.

 

All the "if they give us multiple 1st's and their daughters" talk is kind of fantasy.

Raiders giving us both their first round picks means we give them our 1st and 2nd, and so on and so on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stirs said:

You guys need to pay attention to the draft value charts.

 

All the "if they give us multiple 1st's and their daughters" talk is kind of fantasy.

Raiders giving us both their first round picks means we give them our 1st and 2nd, and so on and so on.

Agreed.

Though in the past... draft value charts get ignored for high 1st QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

Wrong.

I'm not sure what you're trying to contend is factually incorrect here, because both of those statements are accurate, and I'm not sure I even care because you're a terrible poster

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If Brown and Simmons are gone and we're not taking a QB, then we should definitely entertain a trade back. If that doesn't work out, despite lots of hollering from fans, we should probably take the best OT on the board.

What if Brown and Simmons being gone, means Okudah is still on the board?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No saying he mostly sucks is saying that he doesn’t suck the minority of the time.   Like if he took 17 tests and had a couple of really good showings and a handful of pretty good scores sprinkled in among the typical sub par results.   Like a golfer who went out and shot an 89.  There will be some real nice shots sprinkled in there but at the end of the day it is still 89.    
    • It's worth mentioning... Game 1: Oct 11 in Raleigh. 4-3 OT win with a complete starting lineup. Game 2: Dec 13 in Philly. 4-3 SO win without Jaccob Slavin. Game 3: Dec 14 in Raleigh. 3-2 SO win with a complete starting lineup. Game 4: Apr 13 in Philly. 3-2 SO loss with the AHL roster.  Those early season games were no indication of the Canes team that finished the season. Miller and Ehlers were still trying to figure things out, Nikishin was still a work in progress and the Stankoven line was just another line. Make no mistake, the Canes team Philly will see is nothing close to what they saw at any point in the season. If the top line starts producing, Freddie stays hot and the blue line does what it does, this could be a sweep as well.   
    • He is an employee of the team and speaking on the team's official channel. They arent critical of anything ever.
×
×
  • Create New...