Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The 4th Round Big Board for non-scoffers


MHS831

Recommended Posts

still more:

Vs. Obvious Passing Situations

In part due to small sample sizes, this is an area that lacks the same predictive strength of the other lists we have looked at, so we have maintained the two-year look at the data set. This is a top 10 in PFF grade over the past couple of years in obvious passing situations — how each player performed when everybody was focused on the pass and usually targeting a specific landmark to move the chains.

Rank Name Team PFF grade TGT REC COMP% RTG
1 Amik Robertson LA TECH 91.0 29 12 41.4% 26.4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

and lastly, cause you're all getting bored with how good this kid is:

In contested-catch situations

Contesting catches is a vital part of coverage, and while the volume and percentage of targets that are contested is a significant indicator of quality coverage, that’s effectively taken care of already with the other subsets we’ve covered. What isn’t, necessarily, is the performance of the corner at the catch point when they do get to contest targets. Which players have been able to limit the damage most effectively when they have contested targets over the past two seasons?

Rank Name Team PFF grade TGT REC COMP% RTG
1 Amik Robertson LA TECH 98.3 38 9 23.7% 14.4
2 Zane Lewis AIR FORCE 96.3 27 3 11.1% 36.5
3 Kristian Fulton LSU 95.1 38 9 23.7% 44.0
4 Trajan Bandy MIAMI FL 95.0 21 6 28.6% 16.5
5 Bryce Hall VIRGINIA 94.9 29 5 17.2% 53.2
6 Jeff Gladney TCU 94.7 46 10 21.7% 39.1
7 Nevelle Clarke UCF 93.8 31 9 29.0% 26.0
8 Lamar Jackson NEBRASKA 93.5 32 7 21.9% 1.2
9 Trevon Diggs ALABAMA 93.2 27 10 37.0% 37.0
10 Dane Jackson PITTSBURGH 93.1 33 11 33.3% 70.4

Again, over a two-year sample, it’s becoming hard to find a way of slicing the data that doesn’t have Amik Robertson at the top. Again, he has the highest grade on these plays. Obviously, this subset is a group of positive plays for corners by and large, so the grades are higher across the board, but Robertson also allowed a passer rating of just 14.4 on targets that he managed to contest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, pantherj said:

Leki Fotu, DT, Utah is another Huddle favorite, and a fav of mine as well. I like his long arms, he's massive, but he has really low body fat for a guy his size. He's very lean so he won't get gassed out there like the fat guys. Great run stuffer. Fotu and Biadasz are Huddle mock favorites.

I like him too, but if we play Brown at NT and we have Kerr....then I figured we needed a 3T--but Brown's versatility is confusing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, bigdavis said:

and more:

Vs. Passes that were thrown in 3 seconds or less

As I hinted at when I talked about pressure, the longer a corner is asked to cover for, the harder it is for him. Research has indicated that performance on plays up to and including three seconds between snap to throw is a strong critical factor in projecting coverage, so here is that top 10, again over a two-year sample. 

Rank Name Team PFF grade TGT REC COMP% RTG
1 Trevon Diggs ALABAMA 92.5 59 24 40.7% 43.5
1 Amik Robertson LA TECH 92.5 127 70 55.1%

53.1

SOLD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the 4th and 5th round. I feel like it's where some of the best players are made.

it's full of guys that have dropped, have injuries, concerns, etc.

can't wait to see who we get with these next two picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I like him too, but if we play Brown at NT and we have Kerr....then I figured we needed a 3T--but Brown's versatility is confusing.

I seriously doubt we'll draft either player. Fotu isn't needed at this point, and Tyler doesn't fit our system. But I like bother players and had them in my old Panthers mock draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ecu88 said:

We need a CB with size and 100% need Oline interior depth.

 

4th Reggie Robinson II, DB; 6'1 with speed and has played safety before.

5th Keith Ismael, C/G; nice find @MHS831

Thanks---I just noticed him, but 45 has been mocking him in the 5th, so I share the glory...Reggie Robinson--I think I read something about the Panthers liking him---virtual meeting or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rogue Panther said:

He shys away from contact and isn't fast. 

....and has an injury history.  You look at the all the measureables and Hall looks like an ideal pick, but you look at the stats and Robertson is the pick.

I think analytics wins out and Robertson is the pick.  Remember, folks scoffed at Steve Smith's size too.  If this guys is like a pesky gnat and sticks like glue to the WR, those high-point catches shouldn't be that much of an issue.  He'll lose his share of those I suppose, but blanket coverage is more important than getting "Mossed" every so often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would absolutely LOVE Davis-Gaither.  Justin Strnad is another name to watch at OLB.

Charles (Joe Brady's Left Tackle btw), may be more of a guard at the next level but could be pretty good.  Swing tackle depth type but GOOD depth. 

CB wise, Bryce Hall of course but Reggie Robinson and Dane Jackson are guys who could still have impact and have starter potential.  Troy Pride is interesting as well.

There's also some awesome sleeper talent available at WR: AGG, Isaiah Hodgins, Coulter, Gabe Davis, Tyler Johnson (Pleaseeee)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...