Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Rhule’s drafting indicate he has the same three year turnaround plan as he had in the past?


Recommended Posts

One recurring theme with Rhule and the last two teams he has coached is he has seemed to turn things around in year 3, first two years the teams are bad, and year 3 is when things really are firing on all cylinders. With Rhule literally going 100% Defense this draft, could we see him go 100% Offense next year’s draft? 
 

Year 1 draft- all defense

year 2 draft- all offense

year 3- dynasty begins

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be a stellar plan if all picks were a success and if a single draft filled all holes on a certain side of the ball. Time will tell if the picks were a hit. I’d say we still have a few holes on D despite our focus.

  If picks are a success, we can part from Tre and maybe KK after this year, depending on their contract status. So,  I think the silver lining here is that we will free up some money next year and potentially the following. Another successful draft could put us in a spot to finally fill with vet FAs and complete a team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference here is that he already has one of football’s most dangerous weapons (McCaffery), a QB who already knows the system his OC is installing, and veteran players at most of the other positions as well. 
Offense needs to have command of the playbook and the experience to work together and be on the same page. No one has the benefit of camps right now to accomplish that. So, it is probably helpful to rely on veterans to shortcut that process. 
Meanwhile, the plan in defense was to get taller and faster. They will use those young, tall, fast players on defense to hopefully hide some of the experience deficiencies. Both sides will take time to develop, but we chose the easier path given the circumstances. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that rather than as planned, a lot of this draft was just how it fell. It does probably speak to a higher priority on defensive prospects, but who can blame him? Last season saw us field one of the most disappointing defenses in team history, especially if you look at the number of supposedly blue chip players we had.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Khyber53 said:

I think that rather than as planned, a lot of this draft was just how it fell. It does probably speak to a higher priority on defensive prospects, but who can blame him? Last season saw us field one of the most disappointing defenses in team history, especially if you look at the number of supposedly blue chip players we had.

 

And our best players on D from last year are gone...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our already bad D got straight gutted. We had to do something. After we primarily focused on offense in free agency I think it was pretty clear that we were going to have to pretty heavy on D in the draft simply to be able to put a defense on the field. 

And yes, I think the Rhule "process" is a three year rebuild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think you can draw the same conclusion at the pro level.  Rhule has inherited way more talent here (especially on offense) then he did at both college gigs.  He will also have the cap space next year to pretty much go out and sign who he wants.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Smithers said:

I don’t think you can draw the same conclusion at the pro level.  Rhule has inherited way more talent here (especially on offense) then he did at both college gigs.  He will also have the cap space next year to pretty much go out and sign who he wants.  

He's also going to be going up against much higher level of competition. A lot of Panthers fans want to gloss over the fact that Rhule only beat two top 25 teams in his entire college head coaching career. Those two teams? Navy and ECU, not exactly powerhouse perennial top 25 fixtures. The worst team in the NFL is still #32, so the equivalent of a borderline top 25 college team. And there's a much wider gap between #1 and #32 in college in terms of talent level than there is in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He's also going to be going up against much higher level of competition. A lot of Panthers fans want to gloss over the fact that Rhule only beat two top 25 teams in his entire college head coaching career. Those two teams? Navy and ECU, not exactly powerhouse perennial top 25 fixtures. The worst team in the NFL is still #32, so the equivalent of a borderline top 25 college team. And there's a much wider gap between #1 and #32 in college in terms of talent level than there is in the NFL.

His Temple and Baylor squads didn’t beat top 25 teams because they didn’t have the talent, plain and simple.  How many players from those programs(esp in years one and two)  got drafted compared to top 25 programs?  
 

Compared to other NFL teams (even top tier teams), our offense has legit talent.  If our draft picks pan out this year and we can load up in FA and the draft next year, there’s no reason why we can’t be very competitive.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Smithers said:

His Temple and Baylor squads didn’t beat top 25 teams because they didn’t have the talent, plain and simple.  How many players from those programs(esp in years one and two)  got drafted compared to top 25 programs?  
 

Compared to other NFL teams (even top tier teams), our offense has legit talent.  If our draft picks pan out this year and we can load up in FA and the draft next year, there’s no reason why we can’t be very competitive.  

Our OL on paper is definitely below average and so is our starting QB. Our offensive skill positions are nice, but QB and OL are going to be our limitations. Those are significant limitations.

Through most of his career, Rhule basically won the games he was supposed to win while building a program and springing few upsets. That's why I think we're looking at being in the running for the #1 overall pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you think the NFL or NBA are worried about lawsuits or something like officiating scandals bringing down their empires, I think you're giving them way too much credit.  Go watch the documentary on Tim Donaghy in the NBA and who was involved and what he did.  One of the guys he worked with is still one of the league's top trusted officials, especially for playoff games.  IIRC, they have records showing he was the person Donaghy exchanged phone calls with the most during his time fixing games.  And his reputation is beyond horrible...  but he's untouchable.  I also encourage you to go watch DeMaurice Smith's Breakfast Club interview.  He laid out how for fans, we just know these organizations as a singular, public entity - like THE Carolina Panthers, or THE Dallas Cowboys- but, in actuality, he said that is the public-facing identity of an umbrella company comprised of countless smaller businesses and LLCs.  He is tasked with trying to audit their books, and he said these organizations are structured in such a way that even HE can't ever know what they truly make in a year.  It's impossible.  And now, this is just me speculating on top of that, but you think the league's themselves are structured similarly?  They are untouchable.  IIRC, they are recognized legally as "entertainment" organizations, thus protecting themselves in cases where integrity would come into question.  They are protected, layer, behind layer, behind layer.  Betting works because there is some degree of control that ensures the house wins more than it loses, by a lot.  The short of it is, "Give them bread and circuses" and all that jazz.  These leagues operate with total impunity.  Again, it's not just because I'm a Panthers fan, but even if I wasn't and I watched Superbowl 50 without a dog in the fight I would walk away feeling like that outcome was controlled and influenced HEAVILY to where the Panthers were not given a level playing field.  The same poo happens every Sunday to teams playing those blue blood franchises and ones with intriguing storylines. 
    • This Chuba isn't getting traded, but Rico very well could be in a few weeks if he keeps playing well in a tandem backfield with Chuba also playing well. I think we'd end up going with a two headed monster in that case, but with Rico being on a one year deal, it does open up the possibility of a contending team offering up a decent pick for him.  Depending on the recovery of Hampton, I could see someone like the Chargers giving us a 4th for him if they think he could put them over the top, he would fit nicely in a Harbaugh system I think. If it comes to that, we need to make that trade, as I can't see any way we re-sign Rico with all our other needs and getting Brooks back too.  And he's not going to get a contract big enough to get us any comp picks in return, especially if/when we sign a FA or two ourselves.  So if we're not going to bring him back, the prudent decision would really be to get a draft pick for him at the deadline.
    • It's all about what they do at QB. It's clear the rest of the roster is improving. If they commit long term to Young because he's being carried to wins then we're fuged. I think that's a separate issue to finally being competitive again.  There's no QB in this Draft that's going to ride in on his white horse on day one and save us, so we absolutely shouldn't be playing for Draft position. 
×
×
  • Create New...