Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL season just became far more likely


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, Burnout189 said:

Now if we could just hurry up and get a dang vaccine.

The last thing you want is a hurried vaccine.

This is good but not as good as it’s made out to be. Considering it won’t be in a bubble like the NHL. So quick tests still don’t = people either being or not being sick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

It is HUGE because it should really limit outbreaks. Agreed that you do't want to rush a vaccine. Even one that isn't rushed will come with potential dangerous side effects. 

It’s just a test though. If there is outbreaks it doesn’t do anything to change games still being  called off. If there is an outbreak. It just says ok we know sooner. Without full bubble, there are simply too many variables. Young guys wanting to go out, family guys seeing their family who have come in contact with people at school, at the grocery store, etc etc. now add in the element of travel. Unlike the NBA and NHL, who have boxed their entire atmosphere in. You go to the hospital? That’s two weeks before you can rejoin the bubble, at the least. This is why I have no idea why the NFL isn’t doing a 4 stadium bubble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

50% effective vaccines

are still very helpful.

I’ll pass.  There has never been an effective vaccine for any RNA virus and this one will be no different.  Stop wasting time waiting on something that isn’t going to happen.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, ickmule said:

I’ll pass.  There has never been an effective vaccine for any RNA virus and this one will be no different.  Stop wasting time waiting on something that isn’t going to happen.  

Where do you get this stuff? 
 

The measles and the flu are both RNA viruses. The MMR (measles) vaccine is quite effective. 
 

https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/213/4/600/2459431

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, ickmule said:

I’ll pass.  There has never been an effective vaccine for any RNA virus and this one will be no different.  Stop wasting time waiting on something that isn’t going to happen.  

The leading candidates arent all RNA vacccines. Of the 5 leading candidates there are 2 RNA type vaccines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I appreciate the measured tone, truly. Hopefully we're at a point where we can dive a little deeper into the discussion. The observation about his footwork is fair in theory, but I'd also counter with 6'1" Brock Purdy recently admitting that he can't see his target on 40% of his throws due to the linemen in front of him. He just inked a massive deal, and while a lot of fans are understandably wondering what he's going to do with reduced weapons, "not seeing over the line" just doesn't seem to be that big of a disqualifier with his understanding of timing, leverage, and pre-snap reads (Aaron Rodgers is 6'2"... bet he's dealt with the same). Bryce is likely dealing with similar challenges due to his size, but it clearly doesn't mean it can't be managed at a high level. Also, I'm not convinced that "prototypical footwork" should be the end goal for a QB that isn't built like the prototype. What matters more is timing and rhythm with his receivers... which, as we've both noted, has been evolving as the WR room flips from vet stopgaps to rookies. He will need to improve there. That's not in dispute. What is in dispute is the impact that footwork is having on his ability to process and execute. The earlier suggestion that he's “hopping around” to see the field implies a frantic or panicked visual search, which just isn’t something we’ve seen reflected in either the film or any reliable breakdown. If it were as exaggerated as described, it would’ve become a meme-worthy moment (or at least been on SportsCenter's Not Top 10). Instead, we've seen a QB who, like many young passers, occasionally loses platform stability under pressure. That is something that's common and correctable, and again, not something that shows up with enough frequency to suggest it's an endemic flaw. It’s worth continuing to track, but to argue it's a defining issue requires stronger proof than anecdote. As for the "investments" made in the offense after drafting Bryce, I think that might be stretched a bit. Yes, we've used back-to-back firsts on WRs and signed guards to big contracts. But beyond that? Mingo (2nd) and Diontae (FA) are gone. Zavala (4th) was the worst-rated OL in the league his rookie year Sanders (4th) and Evans (5th) are mid-round TEs. Tremble was given a small contract extension but is said here to be at best a blocking TE2. Jimmy Horn Jr (6th) and Coker (UDFA) are the other WR investments Corbett + BC got one-year deals coming off of injury Cade Mays was tendered, but he was cut to start last season That's not some overwhelming infusion of elite talent. It's better, sure... but acting like it's some embarrassment of riches feels overstated. Expecting instant chemistry and impact from rookies and second-year guys while simultaneously mocking the idea of contending this year also feels a little... off? So far, what I've heard as your criteria boils down to red zone efficiency and intermediate passing to the sidelines? You mentioned moving the ball inside the 20s... I'd recommend 3rd down conversion rate, big-time throws, and turnover-worthy plays. For red zone play specifically, we could look at turnovers inside the 20. Incompletions in the red zone as well as intermediate sideline incompletions could provide an interesting starting point for film study. Hell, any of these would give us a more objective framework to work from if you're open to using them. Do any of them work for you?
    • I honestly can't stand the knee jerk emotional fans on both sides be they critical or homers, very much a wait and see try to remain objective as long as possible type fan.
    • See you guys had me wrong the other day I'm not a blind homer I just like more than a game sample size, that and with Morrow at fault for 4 goals i wanted to see if they could adjust and if rod the dud would play Boom. Well we got the answer.
×
×
  • Create New...