Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The reason Joe Brady picked Teddy over Cam


therealmjl

Recommended Posts

It’s well documented that Joe Brady had tremendous influence on the decision to bring in Teddy. Red flag alert that an unproven 30 year old coordinator has that much pull in an organization off the bat, but whatever.

The reason that he chose to do this is simple: Cam Newton is an alpha dog who would never listen to Joe Brady lol....and why would he?

Teddy is your typical alpha-beta male. Can command a room until a real alpha dog shows up. I would say he is closer beta than alpha but I’m not keeping score.

anyway, Joe Brady needed a beta guy around in order to be able to coach him. Unproven college coaches can’t hold a candle to Newton caliber NFL players so that is why they made the decision and ultimately why this team is made up of so many betas, castoffs, and young guys.
 

Quite simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
17 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

After all this talk about how amazing Cam Newton did yesterday I was kind of shocked to find out he didn't complete a pass over 14 yards. He also ran 15 times?? 

At that pace, Cam won't make it to mid season. I hope New England has a better plan for him long term. 

Agreed. McDaniels has always seemed to have wanted a running threat at QB. I hope he doesn't fall in love with that new toy because yesterday it seems like he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/14/2020 at 10:17 AM, Jeremy Igo said:

After all this talk about how amazing Cam Newton did yesterday I was kind of shocked to find out he didn't complete a pass over 14 yards. He also ran 15 times?? 

At that pace, Cam won't make it to mid season. I hope New England has a better plan for him long term. 

Belichick has specific game plans for each team, something we aren't used to seeing much variety under Rivera/Fox who want to win with the same formula every time no matter who the opponent is. Miami has really good starting corners and New England's outside receivers don't have much experience. Solution, beat at their weakness through the ground game, let their defense force Fitzpatrick into mistakes, take the easy win. He will not use the same game plan against Seattle, that's why he's the best. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...