Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Raiders at Panthers Gameday thread!

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Wowbiggulps Newbie

Wowbiggulps

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Yall just go root for Cam and trash the Panthers' QB whose stats were better, then call yourself a Panther fan.  Confusion.

I've not said a single negative thing about Bridgewater at all.  You are just getting defensive and butthurt for some reason, lol.  Maybe take a break from the boards for a while. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

Yall just go root for Cam and trash the Panthers' QB whose stats were better, then call yourself a Panther fan.  Confusion.

you're arguing right now predominantly with a group of people that like both QBs.  the mods have been taking out the troll posts from this thread.  there are plenty of other threads you can post your take in RE: cam vs teddy. 

Cam had a very good game.  He moved the ball when he needed to and protected it. Teddy did enough that we could have won the game, but our defense was garbage, and when it really mattered, the coaches took the ball out of his hands.

I'm happy with both their debuts.  I didn't expect us to win, or even be as competitive as we were, without preseason etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

you intentionally left his TDs off because he accounted for more TDs than Teddy, lol.

Did I?

Look at the stats of the other Pats.  So he scored 2 TDs but he cannot do it all himself.  Had the Fins been any good--had the defense not given Cam the ball 3 times (interceptions), Cam would have had to throw more.  He was limited in what he was asked to do.  They had a lead---and he ran for 2 TDs while his RB has under 40 yards.  Front running was always Cam's forte--and he has always benefited from a solid D.  Bridgewater had to make plays.  Cam simply had to make safe plays. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggieLean Grand Master

AggieLean

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

And for you Cam nut huggers who want to compare his win to Bridgewater's loss:

Cam:  155 yards, 0 TDs 0 Ints.  75 yards rushing (average 5.0)

TB:  270 yards  1TD, 0 Ints  26 yards rushing (average 6.5)

You have no argument, so shut up.

 

Accuracy is your big thing, so who was more accurate? Who had the better looking passes throughout the game?

Cam nut huggers lol. You’re going to look even worse as the season progresses. Only a matter of time before you and the others who love to take shots, yet can’t handle them being thrown back, cry to the mods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest numbaoneforevea

Guest numbaoneforevea

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

Accuracy is your big thing, so who was more accurate? Who had the better looking passes throughout the game?

Cam nut huggers lol. You’re going to look even worse as the season progresses

this gonna last all season aint it

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Bucs are gonna win a lot of games.  Talent all over

I agree, but they pretty much sold out to win a superbowl this year or next.  If they don't, then they go back to being the bottom of the league in a couple of years.
 

Don't get me wrong, if we won sold out to win one, and did it, I would think it was well worth it.  But they have to win.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Did I?

Look at the stats of the other Pats.  So he scored 2 TDs but he cannot do it all himself.  Had the Fins been any good--had the defense not given Cam the ball 3 times (interceptions), Cam would have had to throw more.  He was limited in what he was asked to do.  They had a lead---and he ran for 2 TDs while his RB has under 40 yards.  Front running was always Cam's forte--and he has always benefited from a solid D.  Bridgewater had to make plays.  Cam simply had to make safe plays. 

 

looks like a lot of "if if if".  Cam made plays he needed to take a lead, then to build the lead when the Fins started to threaten.  we don't kno what happens if Cam is not playing the Fins, or if he's on a different team, or they hand off the ball on those TD runs, or what.  What we do know is that Cam's team won, that Cam had a good game in his return to action, and that there's reason for excitement for his fans, as well as for Patriots fans (fug the Patriots...).

Teddy did have to make plays.  And unfortunately when the game was really on the line, they took the ball away from him.  I don't know why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BulldogZ400 Newbie

BulldogZ400

Posted
Posted

Good game Panthers fans.

All week we heard the Raiders d line was going to come out and punch Carolina o line right in the mouth - and it was the complete opposite.  They manhandled the Raiders d line.  
 

Both defenses were ugly.  You have to be happy with how Bridgwater looked, though.  Good luck the rest of the year...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I agree, but they pretty much sold out to win a superbowl this year or next.  If they don't, then they go back to being the bottom of the league in a couple of years.

Don't get me wrong, if we won sold out to win one, and did it, I would think it was well worth it.  But they have to win.  

I want to see how Brady looks around Week 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggieLean Grand Master

AggieLean

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Did I?

Look at the stats of the other Pats.  So he scored 2 TDs but he cannot do it all himself.  Had the Fins been any good--had the defense not given Cam the ball 3 times (interceptions), Cam would have had to throw more.  He was limited in what he was asked to do.  They had a lead---and he ran for 2 TDs while his RB has under 40 yards.  Front running was always Cam's forte--and he has always benefited from a solid D.  Bridgewater had to make plays.  Cam simply had to make safe plays. 

 

On atleast 2 of those scores, Cam kept drives alive with his feet. You have no clue what you’re talking about. 
 

Front running? You didn’t like Cam from the start, and a few of us picked that up from the start. Now, you hate to see him having any sort of success because it makes you look bad.

Oh, and I picked up the same sort of talk you had about Cam on your assessment of Fields. You’re not fooling anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Clicheking
      Day 2 Targets/Faves

      By Clicheking · Posted

      Give me Anthony Hill Jr or give me death
    • ProcessBlue2
      Mike Kaye predicting we trade up in 2nd round

      By ProcessBlue2 · Posted

      We need a Sam Off Ball Backer to pair with Lloyd. Lloyd is a strong Interior Will especially in Pass Coverage- but that is also Trevin Wallace’s archetype. Need a Rozeboom style run stopper. Rodriguez and Allen fit that
    • woahfraze
      Day 2 Targets/Faves

      By woahfraze · Posted

      There aren’t that many ways to screw Day 2 up.  That’d be them making an obvious reach, or selecting at one of the few positions that we are pretty solid at. Because as excited as we are for the growth and improvement this team is showing, it’s still not an overly talented or deep roster. Honestly, there aren’t really many positions I’d feel bad about. Feelings about Bryce aside (because we are not going to select a QB), it’s really RB (bad positional value) and that’s it. I guess OT too since we grabbed Freeling in Round 1.    While not as high on my wish list as other spots, you can justify WR or TE.     Interior offensive lineman who would likely take over an interior spot either this year (at center) or guard (next for cap casualty of Hunt or Lewis)? Fine by me.   Dlineman? Yes, that’s a highly rotational position and we have zero quality depth.    ILB? Yep, could stand for an upgrade over Wallace.    EDGE? Absolutely wouldn’t hate another option to spell Phillips, Scourton, and Princely.    FS?  Would love to add better coverage skill set to the backend of the defense. Moehrig and Ransom are great in run support but not as good deep. Adding a more traditional FS would allow us to mix and match/run some 3 safety sub packages and or a big nickel type look with a SS down near the line for better run support in possible pass downs.    CB? Could stand to get better at nickel. 
×
×
  • Create New...