Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You need to start wondering what you'd give up to get Lawrence


electro's horse

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Rags said:

So

If we got 4 years of that with our last #1 overall pick who was an excellent QB for us.

What makes this time different? Why is Lawrence different from Cam? When we look at other examples of other teams consistently winning with QBs that aren't #1 overall picks why is Lawrence the outlier?

Again my point isn't "Teddy is undoubtably our future" my point is "Lawrence isn't our only form of the future."

Lawrence is the best prospect since Luck. He’s the prototype. That’s what. I believe he could have better success than Cam, and maybe just as good as Payton Manning. poo, I would prefer Eli Manning with two Super Bowls. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rags said:

And one super bowl to show for it what's your point.

I can point at other teams with constant success and not first overall picks at And (Saints, Packers, Chiefs now and with Alex Smith who was a FA despite being a first overall pick, Pats, Ravens, Steelers) and you keep coming back to Manning and the Colts.

Because he was a first pick. Eli was a first pick, two Super Bowls. Elway, first pick. Two Super Bowls. Just saying and shot. If you want to go the SB route. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, nctarheelreincarnated said:

John Elway, Manning, Luck made the Colts go from 2 wins to 11 in one year, it’s happened numerous times before. 

And then look at what happened with Luck and that team building.

You need more than an Elite QB to win. Between the 3 of those QBs there's 4 rings between them. One of those rings came off the back of a generational defense.

QB is important but we need more than a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Tbe said:

I see us getting 2-3 more wins. I think we get some QB with the 3rd or 4th pick.

I’m not optimistic to get any of the top QBs. We will lose tiebreakers on SOS so I think we are going to be out of the running. Sucks because I don’t see us getting good enough to really compete. Oh well, it was a nice thought while it lasted. I miss a healthy Cam and that’s what I was hoping for, a franchise QBS who can get you there. Teddy’s a nice guy and it’s amazing he’s even playing at this point but damn, we dominated that team and we came one flip away from losing. I mean he sure is on pace for his 14TDs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, nctarheelreincarnated said:

Because he was a first pick. Eli was a first pick, two Super Bowls. Elway, first pick. Two Super Bowls. Just saying and shot. If you want to go the SB route. 

Let's not act like Eli was an elite QB who bought constant sucess. Both of his rings came when the Giants had an elite level pass rush. 

Which again brings me back to: We are not talented enough to carry a QB. 

I get wanting Lawrencs. Hell all 32 teams would salivate at the chance to get him.

But we're not damned if we don't get him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

You need that with any Qb, Cam didn't win here until we put a defense around him and a somewhat competent offensive line. 

Cam has played exactly 10 consecutive games in his career at an elite level.... (including playoffs) although I wouldn't truly call any offensive line he had even somewhat competent, In 2013 we lost to the damn 49ers because we couldn't get a TD in the redzone with Nate Chandlers wiff blocks, 2015 was Remmers and Max protect schemes.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, nctarheelreincarnated said:

So, you wouldn't take two rings? I would take two rings in a hot minute. 

Where did I say that in my post?

Do you think Eli was the sole reason for those rings? Do you think if that D-line was switched with the pats in either of those games he'd get those rings still?

In at least the 2nd ring the Giants were a wild card team.

I'd take a good competitive team and I know you need more than even an Elite QB for that.b

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Very True--and I am a former HS English teacher.  
    • Not a Moore fan-but he had a few good games last year-but I want players that scare you--Renfrow's route running and intelligence, Legette's size, speed, and strength, AT's intelligence and route running, Coker's body control, strong hands, and abilty to win contested catches, and TMac's size, body control, and ability to find soft spots in zone coverages.  Horn gives them the ability to stretch the field and he plays special teams.   Moore has a nice smile and can dance.  He filled in well last season, but to get better as a team, you have to upgrade your players.  I think Moore is a bottom of the roster guy who got bumped when we drafted 2 WRs and signed a legit free agent.  Here is the thing--TMac makes us better because he is great against the zone--man?  Good luck with that.  AT's role can be reduced, and that is probably a good thing.  He can specialize in situational football. Coker?  Just getting started. XL?  Just getting started.  Drafting TMac was probably a bit of a wake up call, but XL will be better as the 2. Renfrow?  I see him splitting reps with AT--keeping both fresh and giving different looks. Horn?  Watch the safety cheat his side when he is in the game--I see a young Steve Smith type in him, but he has yet to play a game.  I hear that Morgan loves him.
    • Burns at 5-6 seems....a little aggressive.
×
×
  • Create New...