Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For the Tank for Trevor/Justin/Lance Crowd


MHS831

Recommended Posts

If we win six games this year, Rhule should get some consideration for coach of the year. This is one of the top three lease talented rosters in the nfl. 
 

I have is splitting with Atlanta, beating Detroit and beating Denver. 
 

4-12 and a top five pick behind the Jets, Giants, and potentially Bengals. 
 

regardless, the NY teams being so bad is going to require us to give up a future first to go get our QB. May as well go ahead and make peace with that fact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bigdog10 said:

If we win six games this year, Rhule should get some consideration for coach of the year. This is one of the top three lease talented rosters in the nfl. 
 

I have is splitting with Atlanta, beating Detroit and beating Denver. 
 

4-12 and a top five pick behind the Jets, Giants, and potentially Bengals. 
 

regardless, the NY teams being so bad is going to require us to give up a future first to go get our QB. May as well go ahead and make peace with that fact. 

My question is, what has Detroit shown that makes us so confident in Carolina beating them? They should've beaten the Bears, they just beat a 2-0 Cardinals team, and their big loss was to one of the best teams in the NFL in the Packers. I don't see that as a win anymore, I see that as a maybe, if that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, GoPanthers123 said:

The tank mentality equals to having no faith in coaching and management to build upon success year after year, which is the actual Carolina plan according to both Tepper and Rhule - the men in charge. 

The tank mentality is the only way we have a chance is to win the draft or tank lottery.  So basically already given up on winning through gradual improvement.

Lol you aren't going to win a Superbowl through gradual improvement. 

 

Where are you going to get a QB after all the pieces are in place? You won't have the money for a free agent. 

Hey Rhule, this isn't college dumbazz. You don't get to recruit a top QB. Winning here and there does nothing to bring in top players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Another two years".  Bottom line: Teddy has an entirely reasonable contract and we are by no means stuck with him. 

This is year one of 3 and we're obviously targeting a new rookie at QB so it's not like we're adding on another vet FA QB contract.  And he's only a 5 mil dead cap penalty if we get rid of him in 2022.  This constant "We paid Teddy too much", "We're stuck with him" talk is a block of hyperbole. 

He'll be gone or a backup as the next guy we find rises into the role. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, top dawg said:

I hear you. I was all-in on Teddy, until I started seeing some limitations. He really doesn't have a strong arm, especially to be so young. I think it reflects limited strength, ability to escape pressure, and ability to actually put the team on your shoulders and will them to victory (although I think the last two are debatable). I don't have to have a flashy guy, but I would like a dynamic guy, and I think Teddy's dynamism is suspect. That being said, I think he's a good QB, and I will support him. But, I'm not all-in on him. I just can't be after seeing a couple of the guys presumably coming out this year.

It's like these guys couldn't see the speed difference between the QBs yesterday. 

One guy had a paintball gun ( Teddy)

The other had a howitzer (Herbert)

It was night and day.

Hell look at old man Rodgers last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, top dawg said:

I'm not "hung up on Lawrence talk." I don't mind Lawrence talk at all, but I think it's less realistic considering that the Jets really suck. And Minny and Washington and maybe even the Jags' are all in the running possibly. So talk about Lawrence all you like!

Don't get it twisted! My issue is with people who get upset with us winning and even trying to win. My issue is with people saying that we should tank (like pro franchises---players will play to lose)! I don't care for trading a king's ransom in draft capital either, but I don't have an issue with it, even though I don't necessarily agree with it. 

Stop trying to equate discussing college QBs with advocating for tanking! 

On the real, I decided to start a Lance thread because of the Fields thread! So, yeah, I'm pushing back against the notion that Lawrence or Fields is our savior, but Lawrence appears to be even less realistic than the other two after our victory, but that's because our defense showed signs of life, not because Teddy isn't a good QB. We could be 3-0 right now if the defense played like they did today in all three games, and that's despite Teddy's play against the Bucs!

Tanking isn't about purposely losing. 

It's about sitting any hurt players and not shooting them up with meds for meaningless wins.

It's about playing as many young guys as possible and not signing any vets.

You can put a less talented team out there that's young. Run your system and try hard and just lose that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 4th who shall not be mentioned (yet) but Kyle Trask is looking dynamite for the Gators.

And last but not least, no one should sleep on Tanner Morgan.  He's had amazing receivers and a great system in Minny but the kid knows how to win. 

Overall, if we can get Lawrence, I don't think there's a question, you take him.

So that's my list.

1-Lawrence

2A-Fields

2B-Lance

2C-Trask

--

Late R1/Beyond:

3A-Ehlinger "Chasing a fool for you, I've got you wrapped around my fingersssss"

3B-Morgan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can get a franchise guy after the top 5 picks. These are the draft positions each of the playoff quarterbacks from last year.

2nd (Wentz), 10th (Mahomes), 24th (Rodgers), 32nd (Jackson), 32nd (Brees), 62nd (Garoppolo), 75th (Wilson), 102nd (Cousins).

I'd love Lawrence, but we can still find a franchise guy even if we don't get him.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nctarheelreincarnated said:

Hey, hey, hey, let’s stop bringing facts to an opinion party alright? Thanks. 

Read his post again.  He cherry-picks and makes opinionated statements.  Unfortunately, people do not understand what losing does to a franchise.  Winning breeds emotional commitment--losing breeds fear of losing a job and obligation.   It does create a culture.  Detroit has had some pretty high draft picks.  Cleveland has had first round gold in the draft.  We got good players picking early in the draft, but the complete roster is how you win.  Injuries, salary cap are more important than first round draft picks.  The best teams have the best contracts from top to bottom.  This is why I am against Marty Hurney---people think the draft is the best measure of his success--look at his second round success rate.  Look at the contracts. 

Secondly, a losing season hurts your ability to attract free agents. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, trueblade said:

You can get a franchise guy after the top 5 picks. These are the draft positions each of the playoff quarterbacks from last year.

2nd (Wentz), 10th (Mahomes), 24th (Rodgers), 32nd (Jackson), 32nd (Brees), 62nd (Garoppolo), 75th (Wilson), 102nd (Cousins).

I'd love Lawrence, but we can still find a franchise guy even if we don't get him.

 

 

Great post.  I would argue that the highest draft pick here is perhaps the worst qb on this list.

'This year is a very good QB draft--yes, I think Lawrence and Fields are going to be solid QBs.  I love Lance.  But we need to find a gem that is developing into an elite player--maybe a player with a bad organization/system.  They are out there.  Bridgewater gives us 2 years to develop a good young QB.

Secondly, most people get impatient.  A good QB needs good offensive linemen, good WRs, and a good defense.

Teams that suck often try to draft that miracle player to turn the franchise around and they put him in a situation to fail.  Draft history is full of these "busts."  However, the qbs you post had better situations.

1.  A QB drafted later in the draft has a chance to learn and develop, on average, more than a top 3 draft pick.  

2. A QB drafted later in the draft goes to a better team than a top 3 draft pick.

 

So while your post seems incredibly improbable, it is just the opposite.  The situation is incredibly important. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't see us having a top 2 pick.  To be that bad you need one side of the ball to be terrible, and the other to be average to below average.

I think our offense is going to keep us in some games and if the defense gets a turnover to two and plays well we might win a few more.  Our schedule is really easy.

Personally I think Trevor ends up in New York, I can really see one of those teams getting the top pick.

With the cancelation of his season Lance is probably more likely to fall between him and Fields.  

Best case for us is hoping we can draft Lance in that 4-7 range without trading up.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

I just don't see us having a top 2 pick.  To be that bad you need one side of the ball to be terrible, and the other to be average to below average.

I think our offense is going to keep us in some games and if the defense gets a turnover to two and plays well we might win a few more.  Our schedule is really easy.

Personally I think Trevor ends up in New York, I can really see one of those teams getting the top pick.

With the cancelation of his season Lance is probably more likely to fall between him and Fields.  

Best case for us is hoping we can draft Lance in that 4-7 range without trading up.

 

NY, NY, Jacksonville, Miami, Denver, Philly, Detroit,  Washington---off the top of my head--are 8 teams that could easily finish below Carolina. I think it will be like last year--3 QBs in the top picks (NY Jets, Jacksonville, and Washington for one, and expect Indy to be aggressive).  Lance is a possibility, but we would have to be in the top 5 or so, IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In another post, Snow says about three years before you can properly grade a rookie class.  Sounds about right…
    • And this reiterates why I don’t want a Young contract extension. Please let us find another QB. 
    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
×
×
  • Create New...